A Pascual-Russo1, D Milito2, L Facio2, M Furia2, V Forestier2, S Iseas3, G Méndez3, M Coraglio4, C M Lumi4, G Masciangioli4, E Mauriño5, H Vázquez6. 1. Motilidad Digestiva, Hospital de Gastroenterología «Dr. Carlos Bonorino Udaondo», CABA, Argentina. Electronic address: apascualrusso@gmail.com. 2. Motilidad Digestiva, Hospital de Gastroenterología «Dr. Carlos Bonorino Udaondo», CABA, Argentina. 3. Sección Oncología, Hospital de Gastroenterología «Dr. Carlos Bonorino Udaondo», CABA, Argentina. 4. Servicio de Proctología, Hospital de Gastroenterología «Dr. Carlos Bonorino Udaondo», CABA, Argentina. 5. Departamento de Medicina, Hospital de Gastroenterología «Dr. Carlos Bonorino Udaondo», CABA, Argentina. 6. Departamento de Medicina, Hospital de Gastroenterología «Dr. Carlos Bonorino Udaondo», CABA, Argentina; Investigador Asociado, Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. CABA, Argentina.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The watch-and-wait (WW) strategy is an alternative to anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer (RC) that have had a complete clinical response to neoadjuvant treatment. Few reports describe the quality of life and functional anorectal disorders (FADs) in that population. AIM: To analyze and compare the FADs and quality of life in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated with neoadjuvant therapy, divided into two different strategy groups: group 1 (G1), WW; and group 2 (G2), anterior resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients (G1: n = 20 and G2: n = 10) that had finished neoadjuvant therapy at least 12 months prior were included. Mean patient age was 59.5 years (range: 41-79) and 15 of the patients were men. The FADs were evaluated through: a) clinical history, b) 21-day bowel diary, c) Jorge and Wexner fecal incontinence scale, d) anorectal manometry (ARM), and fecal incontinence quality of life scale (FIQL). RESULTS: Bowel diary: fecal incontinence (40%) and urge to defecate (45%) in G1 vs. fecal incontinence (60%) and urge to defecate (30%) in G2, with no significant differences (p = NS). Fecal incontinence scale: fecal incontinence in G1 was significantly less severe than that in G2 (median 6.5 points vs. 13 points [p = 0.0142]). ARM: no differences between the two groups. Quality of life: significantly different between the two groups (FIQL/G1: 3.7 vs. FIQL/G2: 2.8; p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The WW follow-up strategy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer was associated with better quality of life and reduced fecal incontinence.
INTRODUCTION: The watch-and-wait (WW) strategy is an alternative to anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer (RC) that have had a complete clinical response to neoadjuvant treatment. Few reports describe the quality of life and functional anorectal disorders (FADs) in that population. AIM: To analyze and compare the FADs and quality of life in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum treated with neoadjuvant therapy, divided into two different strategy groups: group 1 (G1), WW; and group 2 (G2), anterior resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients (G1: n = 20 and G2: n = 10) that had finished neoadjuvant therapy at least 12 months prior were included. Mean patient age was 59.5 years (range: 41-79) and 15 of the patients were men. The FADs were evaluated through: a) clinical history, b) 21-day bowel diary, c) Jorge and Wexner fecal incontinence scale, d) anorectal manometry (ARM), and fecal incontinence quality of life scale (FIQL). RESULTS: Bowel diary: fecal incontinence (40%) and urge to defecate (45%) in G1 vs. fecal incontinence (60%) and urge to defecate (30%) in G2, with no significant differences (p = NS). Fecal incontinence scale: fecal incontinence in G1 was significantly less severe than that in G2 (median 6.5 points vs. 13 points [p = 0.0142]). ARM: no differences between the two groups. Quality of life: significantly different between the two groups (FIQL/G1: 3.7 vs. FIQL/G2: 2.8; p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The WW follow-up strategy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer was associated with better quality of life and reduced fecal incontinence.