| Literature DB >> 32867994 |
Y Ma1, Y Z Shi2, Q J Wu2, Y Q Wang2, J P Wang2, Z H Liu2.
Abstract
In this study, we explored the effect of dietary lead nitrate on zootechnical performance, egg quality, accumulation of ovarian plumbum (Pb), follicular atresia rate, and ovarian oxidative stress in laying hens. Furthermore, the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling molecule was studied to reveal the molecular mechanism of the stress. A total of 512 Hy-Line Brown laying hens aged 40 wk were randomly allocated to 4 groups (with 8 pens per group and 16 hens per pen). The Pb concentrations used to treat the 4 groups were 3.20, 33.20, 63.20, and 93.20 mg/kg. The results revealed that dietary Pb exposure significantly linearly reduced the zootechnical performance (P < 0.01) but significantly linearly increased the feed conversion ratio (P < 0.01). The dietary Pb exposure significantly linearly reduced the Haugh units (P < 0.01), albumen height (P < 0.01), eggshell thickness (P < 0.01), and eggshell strength (P < 0.01). In addition, the dietary Pb exposure significantly enhanced the follicular atresia rate (P < 0.01). After dietary Pb exposure, superoxide dismutase (P < 0.01) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) (P < 0.01) activities and glutathione (P < 0.01) contents were significant decreased quadratically, and there were significant linear decreases in the activities of catalase (CAT) (P < 0.01) and glutathione reductase (GR) (P < 0.01), whereas malondialdehyde content was significantly linearly increased (P < 0.01). In addition, except for manganese superoxide dismutase, the gene expressions of copper-zinc superoxide dismutase (P < 0.01), CAT (P < 0.01), and GR (P < 0.01) were significant decreased linearly. In addition, there were significantly quadratic decreases in the mRNA expressions of GSH-Px (P < 0.01) and Nrf2 (P < 0.01). By way of contrast, the Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) gene expression was significantly linearly increased (P < 0.01). In conclusion, dietary Pb exposure could induce oxidative stress by impairing the Nrf2-Keap1 signal pathway in the ovaries of laying hens.Entities:
Keywords: Nrf2–Keap1 pathway; laying hen; lead; ovary; oxidative stress
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32867994 PMCID: PMC7598106 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Composition and nutrient content in the basal diet.
| Ingredients | % | Analyzed nutrient content | %, unless noted |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn | 62.00 | Metabolizable energy, MJ/kg | 10.91 |
| Soybean meal (44.20% CP) | 22.00 | Crude protein | 15.51 |
| Wheat bran | 3.00 | Lysine | 0.78 |
| Limestone | 8.00 | Methionine | 0.34 |
| Calcium phosphate | 1.25 | Tryptophan | 0.16 |
| Sodium chloride | 0.40 | Total phosphorus | 0.48 |
| Premix | 3.35 | Nonphytate phosphorus | 0.37 |
| Total | 100.00 | Calcium | 3.523.20 |
The premix provided the following per kilogram of diet: vitamin A, 7,000 IU; vitamin D3, 2,500 IU; vitamin E, 49.5 mg; vitamin K3, 1 mg; vitamin B1, 1.5 mg; vitamin B2, 4 mg; vitamin B6, 2 mg; vitamin B12, 0.02 mg; niacin, 30 mg; folic acid, 0.55 mg; pantothenic acid, 10 mg; biotin, 0.16 mg; choline chloride, 400 mg; Cu, 20 mg; Fe, 70 mg; Mn, 100 mg; Zn, 70 mg; I, 0.4 mg; Se, 0.5 mg.
Abbreviation: Pb, plumbum.
Sequences of real-time PCR–specific primers.
| Gene | Primer sequences | PCR product (bp) | Accession number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Forward: 5′-CACTGCATCATTGGCCGTACCA-3′ | 223 | ||
| Forward: 5′-CACTCTTCCTGACCTGCCTTAC-3′ | 399 | ||
| Reverse: 5′-TAGACGTCCCTGCTCCTTATTA-3′ | |||
| Forward: 5′-GCTGTTCGCCTTCCTGAGAG-3′ | 118 | ||
| Reverse: 5′-GTTCCAGGAGACGTCGTTGC-3′ | |||
| Forward: 5′-TGGCGGTAGGAGTCTGGTCT-3′ | 112 | ||
| Forward: 5′-ACGGCTCCTCACATCCTCATT-3′ | 109 | ||
| Forward: 5′-ATCACCTCTTCTGCACCGAA-3′ | 258 | ||
| Reverse: 5′-GCTTTCTCCCGCTCTTTCTG-3′ | |||
| Forward: 5′-TGCCCCTGTGGTCAAAGTG-3′ | 104 | ||
| Reverse: 5′-GGTTCGGTTACCGTCCTGC-3′ | |||
| Forward: 5′-AGCGAACGCCCCCAAAGTTCT-3′ | 139 |
Abbreviations: CAT, catalase; CuZnSOD, copper–zinc superoxide dismutase; GR, glutathione reductase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; Keap1, Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1; MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2.
Effect of lead nitrate on zootechnical performance of laying hens.1
| Item | Dietary Pb concentration (mg/kg) | SEM | Contrast | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.20 | 33.20 | 63.20 | 93.20 | L | Q | |||
| EP, % | 84.22a | 81.83b | 81.74b | 80.38b | <0.01 | 0.59 | <0.01 | 0.23 |
| EW, g | 62.77a | 60.96b | 59.94b | 58.10c | <0.01 | 0.43 | <0.01 | 0.96 |
| Feed intake, g/day per bird | 127.42 | 126.80 | 128.27 | 126.66 | 0.46 | 1.20 | 0.76 | 0.39 |
| FCR, g of feed/g of egg | 2.03b | 2.08a,b | 2.14a,b | 2.18a | 0.03 | 0.05 | <0.01 | 0.85 |
Abbreviations: EP, hen-day egg production; EW, egg weight; FCR, feed conversion ratio; Pb, plumbum.
Means within each row with different superscripts were significantly different (P < 0.05). SEM: standard error of the mean by ANOVA (n = 6); L: linear; Q: quadratic.
Regression equation of EP, y = 84.943–1.162x, R2 = 0.606; regression equation of EW, y = 64.202–1.504x, R2 = 0.852; regression equation of FCR, y = 1.976 + 0.052x, R2 = 0.355.
Effect of lead nitrate on egg quality of laying hens.1
| Item | Dietary Pb concentration (mg/kg) | SEM | Contrast | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.20 | 33.20 | 63.20 | 93.20 | L | Q | |||
| Haugh units | 89.07a | 82.53b | 79.12b,c | 77.71c | <0.01 | 1.30 | <0.01 | 0.01 |
| Albumen height, mm | 8.26a | 7.56b | 7.08c | 6.43d | <0.01 | 0.13 | <0.01 | 0.84 |
| Yolk color | 7.35 | 7.09 | 6.86 | 7.03 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.18 |
| Eggshell thickness, mm | 0.38a | 0.37a | 0.33b | 0.31b | <0.01 | 0.01 | <0.01 | 0.37 |
| Eggshell strengthen, kgf/m2 | 4.17a | 3.80b | 3.35c | 3.16c | <0.01 | 0.09 | <0.01 | 0.17 |
Means within each row with different superscripts were significantly different (P < 0.05). SEM: standard error of the mean by ANOVA (n = 6); kgf/m2: kilogram-force/m2; L: linear; Q: quadratic.
Regression equation of Haugh units, y = 89.654–3.355x, R2 = 0.554; regression equation of albumen height, y = 8.832–0.599x, R2 = 0.906; regression equation of eggshell thickness, y = 0.404–0.023x, R2 = 0.754; regression equation of eggshell strengthen, y = 4.493–0.349x, R2 = 0.874.
The yolk color is one of the important indexes of egg quality.
Effect of lead nitrate on accumulation of Pb in the egg of laying hens.1
| Item | Dietary Pb concentration (mg/kg) | SEM | Contrast | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.20 | 33.20 | 63.20 | 93.20 | L | Q | |||
| Albumen, mg/kg | 0.20c | 0.27c | 0.51b | 0.72a | <0.01 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.02 |
| Yolk, mg/kg | 0.31d | 0.61c | 0.90b | 1.20a | <0.01 | 0.04 | <0.01 | 0.96 |
| Albumen, % | 38.99a | 30.50b | 36.32a,b | 37.63a | <0.01 | 2.28 | 0.81 | <0.01 |
| Yolk, % | 61.01b | 69.50a | 63.68a,b | 62.37b | <0.01 | 2.28 | 0.81 | <0.01 |
Abbreviation: Pb, plumbum.
Means within each row with different superscripts were significantly different (P < 0.05). SEM: standard error of the mean by ANOVA (n = 6); L: linear; Q: quadratic. Accumulation of Pb in egg = accumulation of Pb in albumen + accumulation of Pb in yolk. Albumen, % = accumulation of Pb in albumen/accumulation of Pb in egg. Yolk, % = accumulation of Pb in yolk/accumulation of Pb in egg.
Regression equation of the accumulation of Pb in albumen, y = −0.027 + 0.181x, R2 = 0.923; regression equation of the accumulation of Pb in yolk, y = 0.014 + 0.296x, R2 = 0.968.
Figure 1Effect of dietary lead nitrate on accumulation of Pb in the ovary of laying hens and follicular atresia rate in laying hens. (A) Follicular atresia rate in laying hens. (B) Accumulation of Pb in the ovary of laying hens. (C) Representative histological observation of normal follicular and atresia follicular (40×). (D) Pearson's correlation analysis between the follicular atresia rate and accumulation of Pb in the ovary. Standard error of the mean by ANOVA (n = 6). Mean values with different superscripts were different significantly among 4 groups (P < 0.05). Regression equation of the accumulation of Pb in the ovary, y = 15.231 + 27.176x, R2 = 0.976; regression equation of follicular atresia rate, y = 1.016 + 7.808x, R2 = 0.925. Abbreviations: L, linear; Pb, plumbum; Q, quadratic.
Effect of lead nitrate on oxidative stress biomarkers in the ovary of laying hens.1
| Item | Dietary Pb concentration (mg/kg) | SEM | Contrast | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.20 | 33.20 | 63.20 | 93.20 | L | Q | |||
| SOD, U/mg protein | 169.42a | 110.49b | 98.57b,c | 91.17c | <0.01 | 4.29 | 0.01 | <0.01 |
| CAT, U/mg protein | 7.51a | 4.36b | 3.45c | 2.07d | <0.01 | 0.18 | <0.01 | 0.01 |
| GR, U/g protein | 6.81a | 2.66b | 2.17c | 1.86d | <0.01 | 0.09 | <0.01 | 0.01 |
| GSH-Px, U/mg protein | 16.97a | 13.18b | 12.48c | 11.81d | <0.01 | 0.50 | 0.01 | <0.01 |
| MDA, nmol/mg protein | 2.56d | 3.80c | 8.96b | 12.17a | <0.01 | 0.39 | <0.01 | 0.02 |
| GSH, μM/L | 117.00a | 64.24b | 63.36b | 52.11c | <0.01 | 3.02 | 0.01 | <0.01 |
Abbreviations: CAT, catalase; GR, glutathione reductase; GSH, glutathione; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; MDA, malondialdehyde; Pb, plumbum; SOD, superoxide dismutase.
Means within each row with different superscripts were significantly different (P < 0.05). SEM: standard error of the mean by ANOVA (n = 6); L: linear; Q: quadratic.
Regression equation of SOD, y = 243.495–89.079x + 12.882x2, R2 = 0.931; regression equation of CAT, y = 8.653–1.723x, R2 = 0.911; regression equation of GR, y = 7.215–1.536x, R2 = 0.729; regression equation of GSH-Px, y = 21.553–5.512x + 0.778x2, R2 = 0.841; regression equation of MDA, y = −1.632 + 3.401x, R2 = 0.932; regression equation of GSH, y = 174.958–71.445x + 10.378x2, R2 = 0.891.
Effect of lead nitrate on gene expressions of antioxidant enzymes and Nrf2–Keap1 molecules in the ovary of laying hens.1
| Item | Dietary Pb concentration (mg/kg) | SEM | Contrast | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.20 | 33.20 | 63.20 | 93.20 | L | Q | |||
| 0.99a | 0.80b | 0.55c | 0.37d | <0.01 | 0.03 | <0.01 | 0.76 | |
| 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 0.68 | 0.08 | 0.39 | 0.57 | |
| 1.00a | 0.75b | 0.51c | 0.33d | <0.01 | 0.05 | <0.01 | 0.29 | |
| 1.11a | 0.79b | 0.48c | 0.46c | <0.01 | 0.06 | <0.01 | 0.03 | |
| 1.09a | 0.53b | 0.56b | 0.45b | <0.01 | 0.06 | 0.01 | <0.01 | |
| 1.37a | 0.78b | 0.54c | 0.39d | <0.01 | 0.05 | 0.01 | <0.01 | |
| 0.75d | 1.22c | 1.63b | 2.16a | <0.01 | 0.11 | <0.01 | 0.73 | |
Abbreviations: CAT, catalase; CuZnSOD, copper–zinc superoxide dismutase; GR, glutathione reductase; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; Keap1, Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1; MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2; Pb, plumbum.
Means within each row with different superscripts were significantly different (P < 0.05). SEM: standard error of the mean by ANOVA (n = 6); L: linear; Q: quadratic.
Regression equation of CuZnSOD, y = 1.207–0.213x, R2 = 0.948; regression equation of CAT, y = 1.213–0.227x, R2 = 0.899; regression equation of GR, y = 1.280–0.228x, R2 = 0.806; regression equation of GSH-Px, y = 1.695–0.755x + 0.113x2, R2 = 0.790; regression equation of Nrf2, y = 2.110–0.862x + 0.109x2, R2 = 0.952; regression equation of Keap1, y = 0.276 + 0.465x, R2 = 0.902.