| Literature DB >> 32867078 |
Muhammad Rafiq1, Muhammad Shafique2, Anam Azam3, Muhammad Ateeq4, Israr Ahmad Khan1, Abid Hussain5.
Abstract
With the inception of high voltage (HV), requisites on the insulating permanence of HV equipment is becoming increasingly crucial. Mineral/synthetic oil liquid insulation-together with solid insulation materials (paper, pressboard)-is the fundamental insulation constituent in HV apparatuses; their insulation attributes perform a substantial part in a reliable and steady performance. Meanwhile, implications on the environment, scarcity of petroleum oil supplies and discarding complications with waste oil have stimulated investigators to steer their attention towards sustainable, renewable, biodegradable and environmentally friendly insulating substances. The contemporary insulating constituent's evolution is driven by numerous dynamics-in particular, environmental obligations and other security and economic issues. Consequently, HV equipment manufacturers must address novel specifications concerning to these new standards. Renewable, sustainable and environmentally friendly insulating materials are continuously substituting conventional insulating items in the market place. These are favorable to traditional insulating materials, due to their superior functionality. The also offer explicit security and eco-friendly advantages. This article discusses cutting-edge technology of environmentally friendly insulating materials, including their fabrication, processing and characterization. The new renewable, insulating systems used in HV equipment are submitted and their fundamental gains stated in comparison with conventional insulating materials. Several experimental efforts carried out in various parts of the world are presented, offering an outline of the existing research conducted on renewable insulating systems. The significance of this article lies in summarizing prior investigations, classifying research essence, inducements and predicting forthcoming research trends. Furthermore, opportunities and constraints being experienced in the field of exploration are evidently reported. Last but not least, imminent research proposals and applications are recommended.Entities:
Keywords: environmentally friendly; natural ester; renewable insulation; sustainable oil; transformer insulation; vegetable oil
Year: 2020 PMID: 32867078 PMCID: PMC7503315 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25173901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Classification of liquid insulating fluids based on their application.
Figure 2Main causes of high voltage (HV) equipment (especially transformer) collapse [29] with permission from Elsevier.
Figure 3Timeline of research and development on insulating liquids for HV applications.
Figure 4Timeline of proceedings in the development and application of natural-ester insulating fluids.
Properties of fluid insulation.
| Electrical Properties | Chemical Properties | Physical Properties |
|---|---|---|
| Alternating current (AC) Breakdown strength (BDS) | Oxidation stability | Thermal conductivity |
| Lightning impulse (LI) BDS | Gassing features under electric stress | Specific heat |
| Partial discharge inception voltage (PDIV) | Ionization situations (silent discharge) | Coefficient of volume expansion |
| Dielectric dissipation factor | Gassing features under high-temperature pyrolysis conditions (thermal and disruptive discharge) | Viscosity |
| Volume resistivity | Neutralization value | density |
| Permittivity | Saponification value | Pour point |
| Contaminants | Sulfur staining and corrosion | Refractive index |
| Nitrogen content | Molecular weight | |
| Ionic contamination | Solvent power | |
| Moisture content | Vapor pressure | |
| Flammability | ||
| Interfacial tension |
Summary of characteristics of insulating fluids applied in HV equipment [5].
| Features | MO | Silicone Fluid | Synthetic Ester | NE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Filtered from crude petroleum | Synthetic | Synthetic | Refined vegetable oil |
| Major component | Composite combination of hydrocarbons | di-alkyl silicone polymer | Pentaerythritol tetra ester | Plant-based natural ester |
| Origin | Refined from oil | Prepared from chemicals | Developed from chemicals | Derived from crops |
| Biodegradability | Slowly biodegradation | Really slow to biodegradation | Readily biodegradable | Readily biodegradable |
| Oxidation stability | Good stability | Outstanding stability | Outstanding stability | Normally oxidation vulnerable |
| Moisture saturation at ambient (ppm) | 55 | 220 | 2600 | 1100 |
| Flash point, °C | 160–170 | ˃300 | ˃250 | ˃300 |
| Fire point, °C | 170–180 | ˃350 | ˃300 | ˃350 |
| Fire categorization | O | K | K | K |
Note: O-flash point ˂ 300 °C, K-flash point ˃ 300 °C as per IEC 61100 standard VOs categorized as low-flammability liquids as per IEC standards.
Electrical features of natural ester fluid and mineral oil (MO).
| Electric Features | MO | NE Fluid | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dielectric strength (BDV), kV | 54.9 | 56.7 | [ |
| Dielectric dissipation factor | 0.081 | 0.45 | |
| Specific resistance, 1012 ohm cm─1@80 °C | 220 | 3 | |
| Gassing tendency, μL/min | −5 | −79 |
Comparison of alternating-current breakdown strengths (AC BDVs) for different insulating liquids.
| Experiment | MO | Synthetic Ester | NE | Silicone Oil | Low Viscosity Silicone Oil | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEC 60,156 2.5 mm | 70 kV | ˃75 kV | ˃75 kV | 50 kV | 70 kV | [ |
| ASTM 1816 1 mm | – | – | 37 kV | – | – | |
| ASTM 1816 2 mm | 60 kV | – | 76 kV | – | – | |
| ASTM D877 | 55 kV | 43 kV | 46 kV | 43 kV | – |
– signifies not available data.
Figure 5Impact of absolute humidity content on AC BDS of different fluids [5] with permission from Elsevier.
Impulse BDV of various insulating fluids with spherical electrodes.
| Gap Distance (mm) | Mean Stress (kV/mm) | Ref. | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO | Silicone Oil | VO (MIDEL 7131) | ||
| 1.0 | 40.6 | 42.0 | 33.4 | [ |
| 2.5 | 38.3 | 47.7 | 33.0 | |
| 2.0 | 45.8 | 42.3 | 44.6 | |
| 2.5 | 39.0 | 34.0 | 36.5 | |
Evaluation of physical characteristics of natural esters (NEs) and MO.
| Physical Characteristics | MO | NE liquid | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viscosity, cSt | @40 °C | 7.800 | 35.12 | [ |
| @100 °C | 2.240 | 8.010 | ||
| Density, @ 25 °C/Cg/cc | 0.855 | 0.924 | ||
| Pour point, °C | −40 | −21 | ||
| Flash point, °C | 145 | 275 | ||
| Interfacial tension, mN/M | 40 | 30 | ||
Relative density of various insulating fluids.
| Feature | Standard | MO | NE Fluid | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative density | ASTM | ≤ 0.91 | ≤ 0.92 | [ |
| IEEE | ≤ 0.91 at 15 °C/15 °C | ≤ 0.96 at 25 °C | ||
| Density at 20 °C (g/mL) | IEC | Max. 0.895 | Max. 1.1 | [ |
Density measurements of different types of vegetable oils.
| Temperature °C | Density, g/cc | Reference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Soybean Oil | Coconut Oil | Corn Oil | Rapeseed Oil | ||
| 23.9 | 0.9193 | – | 0.9188 | 0.9078 | [ |
| 37.8 | 0.9082 | 0.9107 | 0.9082 | 0.8977 | |
| 48.9 | 0.9023 | 0.9033 | 0.9028 | 0.8829 | |
| 60.0 | 0.8939 | 0.8949 | 0.8939 | 0.8829 | |
| 82.2 | 0.8795 | 0.8795 | 0.8800 | 0.8681 | |
| 100.0 | 0.8674 | 0.8669 | 0.8679 | 0.8564 | |
| 110.0 | 0.8615 | 0.8695 | 0.8610 | 0.8501 | |
| 25.0 | 0.915–0.918 | 0.916–0.918 | 0.915–0.917 | – | |
– signifies not available data.
Pour points of various insulating fluids.
| Features | Standard | MO | NE Fluid | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pour point (°C) | ASTM | ≤ −40 °C | ≤ −10 °C | [ |
| IEEE | − | ≤ −10 °C | ||
| Tendency to develop voids | Natural esters presented a reduction in trend to form cavities after cooled further than its pour point temperature | [ | ||
| Cold launch/start | No specific care is necessary while cold launch of NE filled transformer | [ | ||
| Ambient falls below 0 °C | Endorsed to operate transformer under without load circumstance | [ | ||
– signifies not available data.
Fire and flash point particulars of dielectric fluids.
| Characteristics | Standard | MO | NE | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fire protection category | IEC | O1 | K2 | [ |
| Flash point (°C) | ASTM | Limit 145 | Limit 275 | |
| IEEE | − | Min. 275 | ||
| IEC | ≥135 | Min. 250 | ||
| Fire point (°C) | ASTM | Limit 170 | Limit 3000 | |
| IEEE | − | Min. 300 | ||
| IEC | − | Min. 300 | ||
| Calorific value MJ/kg | − | 46 | 37.5 | |
| Transformer parting space obligation from other transformer or structure or another substation apparatus | FM Universal Standard3990 | 1/10th clearance essential for MO filled transformers | ||
| Condition of the fire extinguishing system | required | Not essential even for indoor applications | ||
− signifies not available data.
Fire and flash points of various dielectric fluids.
| Fluid | Flash Point (°C) | Fire Point (°C) | Category | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MO | 160−170 | 170–180 | O | [ |
| Silicone fluid | ˃300 | ˃350 | K3 | |
| Low viscosity silicon fluid | 268 | 312 | K3 | |
| Synthetic ester | ˃250 | ˃300 | K3 | |
| NE | ˃300 | ˃350 | K2 |
Relative evaluation of extraordinary fire point and smaller inflammable fluid immersed transformer categories and their traits.
| Traits | MO | Hydrocarbon Oil | Silicone Oil | NE | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fire opposition | Poor | Outstanding | Outstanding | Outstanding | [ |
| Environmental impression | Moderate | Reasonable | Reasonable | Outstanding | |
| Life probability at max. temperature rating | Good | Good | Good | High | |
| Efficiency | High | High | High | High | |
| Sound level | Low | Low | Low | Low | |
| Functioning temperature | Low | Low | Low | Low | |
| Impurity resistance | Outstanding | Outstanding | Outstanding | Outstanding | |
| Overload capability | Good | Outstanding | − | Outstanding | |
| Initial cost | Low | Low/reasonable | High | Reasonable | |
| Energy costs | Low | Low | Low | Low | |
| Recycle/discarding costs | Low | Low | High | Low |
− signifies not available data.
Water solubility of different insulating fluids.
| Fluid | Ester Associations | Approx. Moisture Saturation at 23 °C (ppm) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MO | 0 | 55 | [ |
| Silicone oil | 0 | 220 | |
| NE | 3 | 1100 | |
| Synthetic ester | 4 | 2600 |
Chemical characteristics of different insulating liquids.
| Experiment Factor | Parameters | MO | NE | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture level, mg/kg | ˂200 | 15.0 | 20.7 | [ |
| Neutralization value, mg of KOH/g of oil | ˂0.06 | 0.01 | 0.08 | |
| Erosive sulfur | Non-erosive | Non-erosive | Non-erosive |
Oxidization stability limits for various insulating fluids.
| Oxidization Stability Limits | Mineral Oil | Natural Ester | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| According to IEC, experiment procedure is similar for both fluids, except a period of expedited aging | 164 h at 120 °C | 48 h at 120 °C | [ |
| Oxidation stability | MO ˃˃˃ NE | [ | |
| Oxidation stability values attained by Rotating Bomb Oxidation test (RBOT) | 300 min | ˂40 min | |
Dissolved gas analysis (DGA) exploration methods of dielectric fluids.
| Method of Measurement | MO | NE Fluid | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DGA method | Identical analysis techniques are appropriate for NEs; though amidst all Duval triangle is the utmost trustworthy procedure to be used for NEs | [ | |
| Duval triangle for electrical fault | Electric defects in NEs fluid (electric discharges, breakdown and PDs) may be discovered by the present MO dual triangle without any change. | [ | |
| Duval triangle for thermal fault | Thermal faults may be discovered for NEs by changing zone limitations for thermal defects T1, T2 and T3 of present MO Duval triangle. | ||
| Relevant Duval triangle for small thermal issues and stray gassing | Duval Triangle 4 | Duval Triangle 6 | [ |
Environmental characteristics of various insulating fluids.
| Characteristics | MO | Synthetic Ester (SE) | NE | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biochemical oxygen demand 5-day SM5210B (ppm) | 6 | 24 | 250 | [ |
| Biodegradability | ||||
|
21-day CEL-L-33 | ˂30% | 80% | 97% to 99% | |
|
OECD 301 classification | Not biodegradable | Readily biodegradable | Readily biodegradable | |
|
IEC 61039 grouping | Not biodegradable | Fully biodegradable | Fully biodegradable | |
| Toxicity | Yes | Low | No | |
| Sustainability | No | Yes | Yes | |
| Fire threat evaluation category (IEC 61039) | O | K | K | |
| Emission profile | Unacceptable | Questionable | Acceptable |
Properties of transformer fluids (typical values/limits) [5].
| Properties | Vegetable Oil | High temperature MO | Silicone Fluid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Light yellow a | Light yellow | Colorless |
| Specific gravity (25 °C) | 0.91–0.92 | 0.89 | 0.96 |
| Kinematic viscosity (cSt) | | | |
| Pour point, °C | −15 to −25 | −20 max. | −50 max. |
| Interfacial tension (IFT), dynes/cm | 25 | 40–45 | 25 |
| Flash point, °C | 310–325 | 275 min. | 300 min. |
| Fire point, °C | 354–360 | 160–180 | 340 |
| Moisture content, ppm dry oil | 50–100 | 10–25 b | 50 |
| (water solubility at 25 °C) | 1200 | 60 | 200 |
| Thermal constants | | | |
| Thermal conductivity, W/mK | 0.17 a | 0.13 | 0.15 |
| Coefficient of expansion/°C | 0.0007 | 0.00073 | 0.00104 |
| Chemical | | | |
| Electrical | | | |
| Breakdown voltage, kV | 74 a | 60 | – |
| Impulse breakdown voltage, kV (needle negative) | 116 a | 145 | 136 |
| Dissipation factor (%) | | | |
| Grassing tendency-ASTM D2300 | −50 a | −19 to 20 | N/A |
| Biodegradability | 97–99 | 30 | Very low |
a For BIOTEMP fluid; b Varies with transformer rating.
Workability observations for various insulating fluids.
| Characteristics | MO | Synthetic Ester | NE | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixability | – | Miscible in all percentages | Miscible in all percentages | [ |
| Appropriateness for cold environments | Acceptable | Acceptable | Questionable | |
| Soluble particles with aging | Yes | Yes (with bigger aging) | Yes (with bigger aging) | |
| Colloidal particles with aging | Yes | No (with lower/moderate aging) | No (with lower/moderate aging) | |
| Major gases created post aging | H2 and C2H2 | CO and CO2 | CO and CO2 | |
| Oxidation stability | Acceptable | Acceptable | Questionable | |
| Absorption capacity | Rises briskly with aging | Rises moderately | Initially high | |
| Antioxidants | required | Required | Strongly required | |
| Gelling | No | No | Partially yes (for breathing units) | |
| Gelling | faster | slower | slower |
− signifies not available data.
Figure 6Common challenges related to environmentally friendly insulation fluids for HV applications.
Use of different insulating fluids in transformers.
| Apparatus | MO | Silicone Fluid | Synthetic Ester | Vegetable Oil (Natural Ester) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power transformers | A | X | B | B | [ |
| Traction transformer | A | A | A | X | |
| Distribution transformer | A | A | A | A | |
| Instrument transformer | A | X | X | X |
(A = mostly used; B = less frequently used; X = presently not used).
Figure 7Overview of gains achieved by the application of natural esters as a substitute of MO.