| Literature DB >> 32866741 |
Hans H de Boer1, Zuzana Obertová2, Eugenia Cunha3, Pascal Adalian4, Eric Baccino5, Tony Fracasso6, Elena Kranioti7, Philippe Lefévre8, Niels Lynnerup9, Anja Petaros10, Ann Ross11, Maryna Steyn12, Cristina Cattaneo13.
Abstract
In this position statement, the Board members of the Forensic Anthropology Society of Europe (FASE) argue that forensic anthropology methods can be used as means of personal identification, particularly in situations with limited availability of traditional identification methods (i.e. dactyloscopy, odontology, and molecular genetic analysis). This statement has been issued taking into account the international migration crises related to thousands of deaths worldwide, in which the utility of these traditional means of identification has been sporadic to non-existent. The statement is however not limited to deaths related to the migration crises, as similar problems may occur in fatalities en masse such as in natural disasters and armed conflicts, and on a smaller scale in cases of homeless or otherwise socioeconomically disadvantaged persons. The number of reports on personal identification based on sound anthropological methodology is increasing in the scientific literature. However, more research is needed to develop evidence-based standard operating procedures and statistical frameworks. It remains essential to raise awareness among forensic practitioners, law enforcement, and judiciary professionals on the utility of forensic anthropology in cases where it can provide sufficient information for identification.Entities:
Keywords: Antemortem; DVI; Forensic anthropology; Identification; Methodology; Postmortem
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32866741 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110456
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Forensic Sci Int ISSN: 0379-0738 Impact factor: 2.395