Brian J Werth1, Nathaniel K Ashford2, Kelsi Penewit3, Adam Waalkes3, Elizabeth A Holmes3, Dylan H Ross4, Tianwei Shen4, Kelly M Hines5, Stephen J Salipante3, Libin Xu4. 1. Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: bwerth@uw.edu. 2. Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 4. Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 5. Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; University of Georgia, Department of Chemistry, Athens, GA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Its long half-life (8.5-16 days) allows for once-weekly or single-dose treatments but could prolong the mutant selection window, promoting resistance and cross-resistance to related antimicrobials such as vancomycin. The objective of this study was to evaluate the capacity of post-distributional pharmacokinetic exposures of dalbavancin to select for resistance and cross-resistance in MRSA. METHODS: We simulated average, post-distributional exposures of single-dose (1500 mg) dalbavancin (fCmax 9.9 μg/mL, β-elimination t1/2 204 h) in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for 28 days (672 h) against five MRSA strains and one methicillin-susceptible strain (MSSA). Samples were collected at least daily, and surviving colonies were enumerated and screened for resistance on drug-free and dalbavancin-supplemented medium respectively. Isolates from resistance screening plates were subjected to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and susceptibly testing against dalbavancin, vancomycin, daptomycin, and six β-lactams with varying penicillin-binding protein (PBP) affinities. RESULTS: Dalbavancin was bactericidal against most strains for days 1-4 before regrowth of less susceptible subpopulations occurred. Isolates with eight-fold increases in dalbavancin MIC were detected as early as day 4 but increased 64-128-fold in all models by day 28. Vancomycin and daptomycin MICs increased 4-16-fold, exceeding the susceptibly breakpoints for both antibiotics; β-lactam MICs generally decreased by two-to eight-fold, suggesting a dalbavancin-β-lactam seesaw effect, but increased by eight-fold or more in certain isolates. Resistant isolates carried mutations in a variety of genes, most commonly walKR, apt, stp1, and atl. CONCLUSIONS: In our in vitro system, post-distributional dalbavancin exposures selected for stable mutants with reduced susceptibility to dalbavancin, vancomycin, and daptomycin, and generally increased susceptibility to β-lactams in all strains of MRSA tested. The clinical significance of these findings remains unclear, but created an opportunity to genotype a unique collection of dalbavancin-resistant strains for the first time. Mutations involved genes previously associated with vancomycin intermediate susceptibility and daptomycin non-susceptibility, most commonly walKR-associated genes.
OBJECTIVES: Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Its long half-life (8.5-16 days) allows for once-weekly or single-dose treatments but could prolong the mutant selection window, promoting resistance and cross-resistance to related antimicrobials such as vancomycin. The objective of this study was to evaluate the capacity of post-distributional pharmacokinetic exposures of dalbavancin to select for resistance and cross-resistance in MRSA. METHODS: We simulated average, post-distributional exposures of single-dose (1500 mg) dalbavancin (fCmax 9.9 μg/mL, β-elimination t1/2 204 h) in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model for 28 days (672 h) against five MRSA strains and one methicillin-susceptible strain (MSSA). Samples were collected at least daily, and surviving colonies were enumerated and screened for resistance on drug-free and dalbavancin-supplemented medium respectively. Isolates from resistance screening plates were subjected to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and susceptibly testing against dalbavancin, vancomycin, daptomycin, and six β-lactams with varying penicillin-binding protein (PBP) affinities. RESULTS: Dalbavancin was bactericidal against most strains for days 1-4 before regrowth of less susceptible subpopulations occurred. Isolates with eight-fold increases in dalbavancin MIC were detected as early as day 4 but increased 64-128-fold in all models by day 28. Vancomycin and daptomycin MICs increased 4-16-fold, exceeding the susceptibly breakpoints for both antibiotics; β-lactam MICs generally decreased by two-to eight-fold, suggesting a dalbavancin-β-lactam seesaw effect, but increased by eight-fold or more in certain isolates. Resistant isolates carried mutations in a variety of genes, most commonly walKR, apt, stp1, and atl. CONCLUSIONS: In our in vitro system, post-distributional dalbavancin exposures selected for stable mutants with reduced susceptibility to dalbavancin, vancomycin, and daptomycin, and generally increased susceptibility to β-lactams in all strains of MRSA tested. The clinical significance of these findings remains unclear, but created an opportunity to genotype a unique collection of dalbavancin-resistant strains for the first time. Mutations involved genes previously associated with vancomycin intermediate susceptibility and daptomycin non-susceptibility, most commonly walKR-associated genes.
Authors: Ashley D Hall Snyder; Brian J Werth; Poochit Nonejuie; John P McRoberts; Joe Pogliano; George Sakoulas; Juwon Yim; Nivedita Singh; Michael J Rybak Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: B J Werth; M E Steed; C E Ireland; T T Tran; P Nonejuie; B E Murray; W E Rose; G Sakoulas; J Pogliano; C A Arias; M J Rybak Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-06-23 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: B J Werth; R Jain; A Hahn; L Cummings; T Weaver; A Waalkes; D Sengupta; S J Salipante; R M Rakita; S M Butler-Wu Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: M Luz Mohedano; Karin Overweg; Alicia de la Fuente; Mark Reuter; Silvia Altabe; Francis Mulholland; Diego de Mendoza; Paloma López; Jerry M Wells Journal: J Bacteriol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 3.490
Authors: Brian J Werth; George Sakoulas; Warren E Rose; Joseph Pogliano; Ryan Tewhey; Michael J Rybak Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2012-10-15 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Benjamin P Howden; John K Davies; Paul D R Johnson; Timothy P Stinear; M Lindsay Grayson Journal: Clin Microbiol Rev Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 26.132
Authors: Shaun D Jackman; Benjamin P Vandervalk; Hamid Mohamadi; Justin Chu; Sarah Yeo; S Austin Hammond; Golnaz Jahesh; Hamza Khan; Lauren Coombe; Rene L Warren; Inanc Birol Journal: Genome Res Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: David J Roach; Joshua N Burton; Choli Lee; Bethany Stackhouse; Susan M Butler-Wu; Brad T Cookson; Jay Shendure; Stephen J Salipante Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2015-07-31 Impact factor: 5.917
Authors: Truc T Tran; Sara Gomez Villegas; Samuel L Aitken; Susan M Butler-Wu; Alex Soriano; Brian J Werth; Jose M Munita Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 5.938