Literature DB >> 32866479

Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve Implantation: Midterm Outcomes.

Delphine Szecel1, Roxanne Eurlings1, Filip Rega1, Peter Verbrugghe1, Bart Meuris2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Because our center participated in the first-in-human trial with Perceval (LivaNova, Sallugia, Italy) in 2007, this series represents the longest available clinical follow-up (11 years) with sutureless technology in aortic valve replacement.
METHODS: We collected all clinical and echocardiographic follow-up in 468 consecutive patients who received Perceval at our institution between 2007 and 2017. In 57% of cases, surgery was combined with coronary artery bypass grafting (39%), mitral valve surgery (17%), or other procedures (13%).
RESULTS: Mean age was 79 years, mean EuroSCORE II was 5.1 ± 5.5 (range, 0.8-67) and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 5.8 ± 5.5. Mean cross-clamp times for isolated and combined procedures were 39 and 79 minutes, respectively. Observed all-cause 30-day mortality was 3.2%, with an early stroke rate of 1.8%. Pacemaker implantation rate was 7.9% overall, but only 3.9% in patients without preexisting conduction or rhythm disorders. All-cause mortality at 1 and 2 years was 8.8% ± 1.3% and 13.2% ± 1.6%, respectively. At the latest echocardiographic follow-up (mean, 3 years; range, 1-11 years), peak and mean gradients were 23 ± 10 mm Hg and 13 ± 6 mm Hg, respectively. During follow-up, we explanted 5 valves for endocarditis, and none for structural valve degeneration.
CONCLUSIONS: After more than 11 years of continued clinical use of the Perceval sutureless valve, we observe low mortality and stroke rates, with good hemodynamic behavior of the valve. None of our patients was reoperated for structural valve degeneration. Because of the key benefits of this rapid-deployment valve, it has an added value in surgical aortic valve replacement.
Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32866479     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

1.  Use of a sutureless aortic valve in reoperative aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Arjune S Dhanekula; Thamanna Nishath; Garbiel S Aldea; Christopher R Burke
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2022-02-26

Review 2.  Benefits and Pitfalls of the Perceval Sutureless Bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Aleksander Dokollari; Basel Ramlawi; Gianluca Torregrossa; Michel Pompeu Sá; Serge Sicouri; Edvin Prifti; Sandro Gelsomino; Massimo Bonacchi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-05

3.  Changes in the Prosthesis Types Used for Aortic Valve Replacement after the Introduction of Sutureless and Rapid Deployment Valves in Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Hyeok Sang Woo; Ho Young Hwang; Ho Jin Kim; Joon Bum Kim; Sak Lee; Cheong Lim; Byung-Cheul Chang; Na Rae Lee; Youshin Suh; Jae Woong Choi
Journal:  J Chest Surg       Date:  2021-10-05

4.  Hemodynamic Performance of Sutureless vs. Conventional Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement: The 1-Year Core-Lab Results of the Randomized PERSIST-AVR Trial.

Authors:  Theodor Fischlein; Elena Caporali; Federico M Asch; Ferdinand Vogt; Francesco Pollari; Thierry Folliguet; Utz Kappert; Bart Meuris; Malakh L Shrestha; Eric E Roselli; Nikolaos Bonaros; Olivier Fabre; Pierre Corbi; Giovanni Troise; Martin Andreas; Frederic Pinaud; Steffen Pfeiffer; Sami Kueri; Erwin Tan; Pierre Voisine; Evaldas Girdauskas; Filip Rega; Julio García-Puente; Laurent De Kerchove; Roberto Lorusso
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.