Literature DB >> 32866413

Deep Learning Using Chest Radiographs to Identify High-Risk Smokers for Lung Cancer Screening Computed Tomography: Development and Validation of a Prediction Model.

Michael T Lu1, Vineet K Raghu1, Thomas Mayrhofer2, Hugo J W L Aerts3, Udo Hoffmann1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening with chest computed tomography (CT) reduces lung cancer death. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) eligibility criteria for lung cancer screening with CT require detailed smoking information and miss many incident lung cancers. An automated deep-learning approach based on chest radiograph images may identify more smokers at high risk for lung cancer who could benefit from screening with CT.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a convolutional neural network (CXR-LC) that predicts long-term incident lung cancer using data commonly available in the electronic medical record (EMR) (chest radiograph, age, sex, and whether currently smoking).
DESIGN: Risk prediction study.
SETTING: U.S. lung cancer screening trials. PARTICIPANTS: The CXR-LC model was developed in the PLCO (Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian) Cancer Screening Trial (n = 41 856). The final CXR-LC model was validated in additional PLCO smokers (n = 5615, 12-year follow-up) and NLST (National Lung Screening Trial) heavy smokers (n = 5493, 6-year follow-up). Results are reported for validation data sets only. MEASUREMENTS: Up to 12-year lung cancer incidence predicted by CXR-LC.
RESULTS: The CXR-LC model had better discrimination (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC]) for incident lung cancer than CMS eligibility (PLCO AUC, 0.755 vs. 0.634; P < 0.001). The CXR-LC model's performance was similar to that of PLCOM2012, a state-of-the-art risk score with 11 inputs, in both the PLCO data set (CXR-LC AUC of 0.755 vs. PLCOM2012 AUC of 0.751) and the NLST data set (0.659 vs. 0.650). When compared in equal-sized screening populations, CXR-LC was more sensitive than CMS eligibility in the PLCO data set (74.9% vs. 63.8%; P = 0.012) and missed 30.7% fewer incident lung cancers. On decision curve analysis, CXR-LC had higher net benefit than CMS eligibility and similar benefit to PLCOM2012. LIMITATION: Validation in lung cancer screening trials and not a clinical setting.
CONCLUSION: The CXR-LC model identified smokers at high risk for incident lung cancer, beyond CMS eligibility and using information commonly available in the EMR. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32866413      PMCID: PMC9200444          DOI: 10.7326/M20-1868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   51.598


  46 in total

1.  Lung cancer screening: enhancing risk stratification and minimising harms by incorporating information from screening results.

Authors:  Emma Louise O'Dowd; Kevin Ten Haaf
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Trends in smoking documentation rates in safety net clinics.

Authors:  Stephen P Fortmann; Steffani R Bailey; Neon B Brooks; Brian Hitsman; Sarah Stuart Rittner; Suzanne E Gillespie; Christian Nissen Hill; Michael C Leo; Phillip M Crawford; Weiming Hu; Dana S King; Conall O'Cleirigh; Jon Puro; Mary Ann McBurnie
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prediction of true positive lung cancers in individuals with abnormal suspicious chest radiographs: a prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial study.

Authors:  Martin Carl Tammemagi; Matthew T Freedman; Paul F Pinsky; Martin M Oken; Ping Hu; Thomas L Riley; Lawrence R Ragard; Christine D Berg; Philip C Prorok
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 15.609

5.  Predictive accuracy of the Liverpool Lung Project risk model for stratifying patients for computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a case-control and cohort validation study.

Authors:  Olaide Y Raji; Stephen W Duffy; Olorunshola F Agbaje; Stuart G Baker; David C Christiani; Adrian Cassidy; John K Field
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Evaluation of USPSTF Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines Among African American Adult Smokers.

Authors:  Melinda C Aldrich; Sarah F Mercaldo; Kim L Sandler; William J Blot; Eric L Grogan; Jeffrey D Blume
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 31.777

7.  Evaluation of the lung cancer risks at which to screen ever- and never-smokers: screening rules applied to the PLCO and NLST cohorts.

Authors:  Martin C Tammemägi; Timothy R Church; William G Hocking; Gerard A Silvestri; Paul A Kvale; Thomas L Riley; John Commins; Christine D Berg
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Martin C Tammemägi; Kevin Ten Haaf; Iakovos Toumazis; Chung Yin Kong; Summer S Han; Jihyoun Jeon; John Commins; Thomas Riley; Rafael Meza
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-03-01

9.  Deep Learning to Assess Long-term Mortality From Chest Radiographs.

Authors:  Michael T Lu; Alexander Ivanov; Thomas Mayrhofer; Ahmed Hosny; Hugo J W L Aerts; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-07-03

10.  Net benefit approaches to the evaluation of prediction models, molecular markers, and diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Ben Van Calster; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-25
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  A narrative review of deep learning applications in lung cancer research: from screening to prognostication.

Authors:  Jong Hyuk Lee; Eui Jin Hwang; Hyungjin Kim; Chang Min Park
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2022-06

2.  Progress and Research Priorities in Imaging Genomics for Heart and Lung Disease: Summary of an NHLBI Workshop.

Authors:  Donna K Arnett; Ramachandran S Vasan; Matthew Nayor; Li Shen; Gary M Hunninghake; Peter Kochunov; R Graham Barr; David A Bluemke; Ulrich Broeckel; Peter Caravan; Susan Cheng; Paul S de Vries; Udo Hoffmann; Márton Kolossváry; Huiqing Li; James Luo; Elizabeth M McNally; George Thanassoulis
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 8.589

3.  A Metabolism-Related Radiomics Signature for Predicting the Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Du Cai; Xin Duan; Wei Wang; Ze-Ping Huang; Qiqi Zhu; Min-Er Zhong; Min-Yi Lv; Cheng-Hang Li; Wei-Bin Kou; Xiao-Jian Wu; Feng Gao
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2021-01-07

4.  Lung cancer risk following previous abnormal chest radiographs: A 27-year follow-up study of a Chinese lung screening cohort.

Authors:  Yaguang Fan; Zheng Su; Mengna Wei; Hao Liang; Yong Jiang; Xuebing Li; Zhaowei Meng; Ying Wang; Heng Wu; Jinzhao Song; Youlin Qiao; Qinghua Zhou
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Diagnostic Value of Deep Learning-Based CT Feature for Severe Pulmonary Infection.

Authors:  Tinglong Huang; Xuelan Zheng; Lisui He; Zhiliang Chen
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 2.682

6.  Predicting EGFR and PD-L1 Status in NSCLC Patients Using Multitask AI System Based on CT Images.

Authors:  Chengdi Wang; Jiechao Ma; Jun Shao; Shu Zhang; Zhongnan Liu; Yizhou Yu; Weimin Li
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Deep Learning to Predict EGFR Mutation and PD-L1 Expression Status in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer on Computed Tomography Images.

Authors:  Chengdi Wang; Xiuyuan Xu; Jun Shao; Kai Zhou; Kefu Zhao; Yanqi He; Jingwei Li; Jixiang Guo; Zhang Yi; Weimin Li
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.375

Review 8.  The Application of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Drug Resistance Prediction of Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Shufan Liang; Jiechao Ma; Gang Wang; Jun Shao; Jingwei Li; Hui Deng; Chengdi Wang; Weimin Li
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-28

Review 9.  The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Early Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Benjamin Hunter; Sumeet Hindocha; Richard W Lee
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.