Literature DB >> 32866229

Impact of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Opioid Dose Reduction: A Nationwide Analysis.

Syed M Adil1, Lefko T Charalambous1, Charis A Spears1, Musa Kiyani1, Sarah E Hodges1, Zidanyue Yang2, Hui-Jie Lee2, Shervin Rahimpour1, Beth Parente1, Kathryn A Greene3, Mark McClellan3, Shivanand P Lad1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Opioid misuse in the USA is an epidemic. Utilization of neuromodulation for refractory chronic pain may reduce opioid-related morbidity and mortality, and associated economic costs.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) on opioid dose reduction.
METHODS: The IBM MarketScan® database was retrospectively queried for all US patients with a chronic pain diagnosis undergoing SCS between 2010 and 2015. Opioid usage before and after the procedure was quantified as morphine milligram equivalents (MME).
RESULTS: A total of 8497 adult patients undergoing SCS were included. Within 1 yr of the procedure, 60.4% had some reduction in their opioid use, 34.2% moved to a clinically important lower dosage group, and 17.0% weaned off opioids entirely. The proportion of patients who completely weaned off opioids increased with decreasing preprocedure dose, ranging from 5.1% in the >90 MME group to 34.2% in the ≤20 MME group. The following variables were associated with reduced odds of weaning off opioids post procedure: long-term opioid use (odds ratio [OR]: 0.26; 95% CI: 0.21-0.30; P < .001), use of other pain medications (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.65-0.87; P < .001), and obesity (OR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.60-0.94; P = .01).
CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing SCS were able to reduce opioid usage. Given the potential to reduce the risks of long-term opioid therapy, this study lays the groundwork for efforts that may ultimately push stakeholders to reduce payment and policy barriers to SCS as part of an evidence-based, patient-centered approach to nonopioid solutions for chronic pain.
Copyright © 2020 by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic pain; Morphine milligram equivalent; Opioid epidemic; Opioid misuse; Spinal cord stimulation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32866229     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa353

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of Sagittal Spinopelvic Balance in Spinal Cord Stimulator Patients.

Authors:  Royce W Woodroffe; Eli A Perez; Scott C Seaman; Brian J Park; Russ P Nockels; Matthew A Howard; Saul Wilson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-06-09

2.  Evaluation of Sagittal Spinopelvic Balance in Spinal Cord Stimulator Patients.

Authors:  Royce W Woodroffe; Eli A Perez; Scott C Seaman; Brian J Park; Russ P Nockels; Matthew A Howard; Saul Wilson
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2021-06-09

Review 3.  A Call to Action Toward Optimizing the Electrical Dose Received by Neural Targets in Spinal Cord Stimulation Therapy for Neuropathic Pain.

Authors:  Krishnan Chakravarthy; Rajiv Reddy; Adnan Al-Kaisy; Thomas Yearwood; Jay Grider
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.832

4.  Association of Spinal Cord Stimulator Implantation With Persistent Opioid Use in Patients With Postlaminectomy Syndrome.

Authors:  To-Nhu Vu; Chachrit Khunsriraksakul; Yakov Vorobeychik; Alison Liu; Renan Sauteraud; Ganesh Shenoy; Dajiang J Liu; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-01-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.