Konrad Schuetze1, Alexander Eickhoff2, Kim-Sarah Rutetzki2, Peter H Richter2, Florian Gebhard2, Christian Ehrnthaller3. 1. Department of Trauma-, Hand-, and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany. konrad.schuetze@uniklinik-ulm.de. 2. Department of Trauma-, Hand-, and Reconstructive Surgery, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081, Ulm, Germany. 3. Department of Trauma Surgery - Campus Innenstadt, Munich University Hospital, Nussbaumstr. 20, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Operative timing, perioperative management and postoperative rehabilitation are rising challenges in orthopedic geriatric trauma. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with dementia or with a high number of comorbidities treated with hemiprosthesis after hip fracture. Literature regarding patients with high comorbidities is scarce, leaving nothing but endoprosthetic treatment for even the sickest, immobile patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 326 patients (mean age 81 ± 9 years; 230 women and 96 men) with hip fractures treated between 2012 and 2017 with a hemiprosthesis was performed. Primary outcome measures were surgical and nonsurgical complication rates, best achievable mobilisation during the hospital stay and mortality. RESULTS: Patients with dementia had 20-fold increased risk to be bedridden after surgery and ninefold increased risk of dying (p < 0.005). Furthermore, they needed significantly more revision surgeries because of surgical complications. Patients classified ASA IV and V had significantly lower postoperative mobilization levels with only 10% able to walk with crutches and 53% bedridden. They also had significantly more non-surgical complications while dementia had no effect on non-surgical complication rate. CONCLUSION: Patients classified ASA IV and V or suffering dementia show poor outcome after hip fracture treated with hemiprosthesis. Multidisciplinary approaches including surgeons, geriatricians, physiotherapists and psychiatrists are needed to improve the outcome of these patients. Especially in a subgroup of patients, where no mobilization is expected, alternative treatment options may be considered.
PURPOSE: Operative timing, perioperative management and postoperative rehabilitation are rising challenges in orthopedic geriatric trauma. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of patients with dementia or with a high number of comorbidities treated with hemiprosthesis after hip fracture. Literature regarding patients with high comorbidities is scarce, leaving nothing but endoprosthetic treatment for even the sickest, immobile patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 326 patients (mean age 81 ± 9 years; 230 women and 96 men) with hip fractures treated between 2012 and 2017 with a hemiprosthesis was performed. Primary outcome measures were surgical and nonsurgical complication rates, best achievable mobilisation during the hospital stay and mortality. RESULTS: Patients with dementia had 20-fold increased risk to be bedridden after surgery and ninefold increased risk of dying (p < 0.005). Furthermore, they needed significantly more revision surgeries because of surgical complications. Patients classified ASA IV and V had significantly lower postoperative mobilization levels with only 10% able to walk with crutches and 53% bedridden. They also had significantly more non-surgical complications while dementia had no effect on non-surgical complication rate. CONCLUSION: Patients classified ASA IV and V or suffering dementia show poor outcome after hip fracture treated with hemiprosthesis. Multidisciplinary approaches including surgeons, geriatricians, physiotherapists and psychiatrists are needed to improve the outcome of these patients. Especially in a subgroup of patients, where no mobilization is expected, alternative treatment options may be considered.
Authors: Yan Press; Yacov Grinshpun; Alex Berzak; Michael Friger; A Mark Clarfield Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2007-03-12 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Ulf Sennerby; Håkan Melhus; Rolf Gedeborg; Liisa Byberg; Hans Garmo; Anders Ahlbom; Nancy L Pedersen; Karl Michaëlsson Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Cornelis L P van de Ree; Mariska A C De Jongh; Charles M M Peeters; Leonie de Munter; Jan A Roukema; Taco Gosens Journal: Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Date: 2017-07-07