Literature DB >> 32865571

Estimated Incidence of Electric Scooter Injuries in the US From 2014 to 2019.

Kevin Xavier Farley1, Matthew Aizpuru2, Jacob M Wilson1, Charles A Daly1, John Xerogeanes1, Michael B Gottschalk1, Eric R Wagner1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32865571      PMCID: PMC7489805          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

In late 2017, scooter-share companies began distributing electric scooters (e-scooters) in major cities, leading to an increase in their use.[1,2,3] Data from the 2019 United States Consumer Product Safety Commission’s National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) have recently become available, allowing continued analysis of nationwide trends in e-scooter injuries since the widespread expansion of scooter-share services. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to assess the incidence of and trends among e-scooter injuries in the US from 2014 to 2019.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used data from the NEISS, a statistically valid surveillance system designed to collect data on patients seen in emergency departments (EDs) with injuries related to consumer products by creating a probability sample from approximately 100 hospitals in the US. The NEISS has previously been used to examine e-scooter injuries.[1,2] It was queried for cases with product code 5042 (scooters/skateboards, powered) and identified 5171 unweighted cases. Electric-scooter injuries were then isolated from the sample through a search with inclusion of the term scooter and exclusion of the terms hover, board, skate, wheelchair, motorbike, and motorcycle, leaving 1823 cases available for analysis. The Emory University institutional review board waived the requirement for review because the study did not meet the definition of human subjects research. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline. Weighted estimates and 95% CIs were created within the complex samples function of SPSS Statistics, version 26.0 (IBM). Data from the US Census Bureau were used to create weighted incidences per 100 000 population. To evaluate trends from 2014 to 2019, regression with a log function was used while accounting for the standard error of the estimates. The significance level was set at P < .05 using a 2-sided test.

Results

There were an estimated 70 644 (95% CI, 53 838-87 448) ED visits for e-scooter–related injuries from 2014 to 2019. The mean (SD) age of those injured was 31.3 (21.24) years (95% CI, 29.4-33.2 years), and 63.9% were men. The estimated number of ED visits for e-scooter injuries increased from 4881 (95% CI, 4086-5676) in 2014 to 29 628 (95% CI, 14 919-44 338) in 2019, with an increase from 8269 visits (95% CI, 5409-11 130 visits) in 2017 to 15 522 visits (95% CI, 8280-22 763 visits) in 2018. The population-adjusted incidence increased from 1.53 per 100 000 capita (95% CI, 1.28-1.78 per 100 000 capita) in 2014 to 9.22 per 100 000 capita (95% CI, 4.64-13.79 per 100 000 capita) in 2019 (Figure). Incident ED visits for e-scooter–related injuries increased most substantially among individuals aged 15 to 24 years and 25 to 39 years (Figure, Table).
Figure.

Trends in Weighted Incidence of Electric Scooter Injuries Seen in Emergency Departments in the US From 2014 to 2019 by Select Age Groups

Table.

Patient Demographic and Injury Characteristics Associated With Electric Scooter Injuries Seen in Emergency Departments in the US From 2014 to 2019

CharacteristicYearWeighted estimate (95% CI)aIncidence, per 100 000 population (95% CI)CountChange, %P valuea
Age group
Total20144881 (4086-5676)1.53 (1.28-1.78)124507.009
20155977 (4545-7409)1.86 (1.41-2.31)135
20166366 (4716-8016)1.98 (1.47-2.49)164
20178270 (5409-11 130)2.57 (1.68-3.46)201
201815 522 (8280-22 763)4.83 (2.58-7.08)397
201929 628 (14 919-44 338)9.22 (4.64-13.79)803
≤14 y20142265 (1392-3139)3.55 (2.18-4.92)6763.12
20193699 (2344-5054)5.89 (3.73-8.05)128
15-24 y2014453 (0-926)1.03 (0.00-2.11)101271.001
2015542 (207-878)1.23 (0.47-1.99)17
20161253 (503-2002)2.85 (1.15-4.56)34
20171256 (263-2250)2.89 (0.61-5.18)27
20182896 (1242-4549)6.71 (2.88-10.54)84
20196217 (2890-9544)14.40 (6.69-22.11)176
25-39 y2014392 (131-652)0.62 (0.21-1.03)142594.002
2015708 (64-1351)1.10 (0.10-2.10)11
2016865 (468-1263)1.33 (0.72-1.93)20
20171423 (419-2428)2.15 (0.63-3.66)30
20184241 (987-7495)6.34 (1.47-11.20)89
201910 555 (3434-17 676)15.77 (5.13-26.42)275
40-64 y20141088 (638-1539)1.04 (0.61-1.48)20563.01
2015968 (502-1435)0.93 (0.48-1.38)23
20161335 (571-2098)1.28 (0.55-2.02)23
20171539 (535-2544)1.48 (0.51-2.44)25
20183001 (691-5311)2.89 (0.67-5.12)61
20197211 (2869-11 552)6.95 (2.76-11.13)181
≥65 y2014682 (171-1193)1.47 (0.37-2.58)13185.046
20191946 (1012-2880)3.71 (1.93-5.49)43
Sex
Men20142655 (1950-3360)1.69 (1.24-2.1470635.007
201919 527 (8839-30 215)12.12 (5.49-18.75522
Women20142226 (1459-2992)1.37 (0.90-1.85)54354.02
201910 101 (5512-14 691)6.08 (3.32-8.85)281
Injury
Traumatic brain injuryb2014707 (315-1098)0.22 (0.10-0.34)21503.004
20194262 (2113-6410)1.33 (0.66-1.99)118
Fracture20141247 (829-1665)0.39 (0.26-0.52)27551.02
20198113 (3115-13 112)2.52 (0.97-4.08)233
Disposition, admitted or transferred2014150 (41-258)0.05 (0.01-0.08)102039<.001
20193198 (1364-5031)0.99 (0.42-1.57)99
Substance use
Any20192656 (494-4818)0.83 (0.15-1.50)73NANA
Alcohol20192340 (378-4302)0.72 (0.12-1.31)63
Other drugs2019332 (50-614)0.10 (0.02-0.19)11

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable.

P < .05 indicates a statistically significant change from 2014 to 2019.

Criteria for a traumatic brain injury included head injury with a concomitant diagnosis of concussion, internal organ injury, fracture, anoxia, or hemorrhage.

Abbreviation: NA, not applicable. P < .05 indicates a statistically significant change from 2014 to 2019. Criteria for a traumatic brain injury included head injury with a concomitant diagnosis of concussion, internal organ injury, fracture, anoxia, or hemorrhage. The head was the most common site of injury (27.1% of all injuries). Approximately 50% of head injuries included diagnoses that suggested a traumatic brain injury (a head injury with a concomitant diagnosis of a concussion, internal organ injury, fracture, anoxia, or hemorrhage), constituting 14.5% of the total injury pool. Of patients presenting with a potential traumatic brain injury, 17.4% were admitted to the hospital compared with 7.7% of patients without this diagnosis (P < .001). In 2019, an estimated 2656 (95% CI, 494-4818) e-scooter injuries involved substance use, with 88.1% involving alcohol (Table).

Discussion

The estimated incidence of e-scooter injuries treated in EDs in the US nearly doubled between 2018 and 2019 despite various regulatory efforts and evidence highlighting this issue.[1,2] Head injuries were the most common cause of visits to the ED, and traumatic brain injuries were prevalent among those injured. These results are troubling given that helmets are used by a minority of riders, helmet requirements have been eliminated in some areas, and riders often misunderstand road traffic laws that guide e-scooter use.[1,4,5,6] Limitations of this study include possible underestimation of injuries, a lack of data outside ED visits, and the absence of information on helmet use. Estimates with fewer than 1200 weighted cases may be unstable. Furthermore, the weighted estimates presented here may not represent the true national incidence of scooter injuries seen in the ED, because scooters are unlikely to be equally distributed across sampled areas. Strengths include the use of a nationally representative data set. The estimated incidence of e-scooter–related injuries seen in EDs increased between 2014 and 2019; thus, this appears to be an important public health issue. Continued efforts should be made to investigate strategies, such as required helmet use, enforcement of laws against riding under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and e-scooter safety education, to potentially mitigate the most serious injuries and keep riders safe.
  4 in total

1.  Electric Scooter Injuries and Hospital Admissions in the United States, 2014-2018.

Authors:  Nikan K Namiri; Hansen Lui; Thomas Tangney; Isabel E Allen; Andrew J Cohen; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Motorized scooter injuries in the era of scooter-shares: A review of the national electronic surveillance system.

Authors:  Matthew Aizpuru; Kevin X Farley; Jaimie C Rojas; Robert S Crawford; Thomas J Moore; Eric R Wagner
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.469

3.  An Early Look at Operative Orthopaedic Injuries Associated with Electric Scooter Accidents: Bringing High-Energy Trauma to a Wider Audience.

Authors:  Chad R Ishmael; Peter P Hsiue; Stephen D Zoller; Pengcheng Wang; Kellyn R Hori; Jonathan D Gatto; Rebecca Li; Devon M Jeffcoat; Eric E Johnson; Nicholas M Bernthal
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Injuries Associated With Standing Electric Scooter Use.

Authors:  Tarak K Trivedi; Charles Liu; Anna Liza M Antonio; Natasha Wheaton; Vanessa Kreger; Anna Yap; David Schriger; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-01-04
  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  Electric scooters: a quick way to get to the emergency department?

Authors:  Thomas Pepper; Matthew Barker; Delia Smyth; Matthew Kingham; Radhika Dua; Kathleen Fan
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 2.727

2.  Delayed Blunt Traumatic Carotid Artery Dissection After a Scooter Accident: A Case Report.

Authors:  Robert Rigby; Suneil Agrawal
Journal:  Clin Pract Cases Emerg Med       Date:  2022-05

Review 3.  Common Injury Patterns from Standing Motorized Scooter Crashes.

Authors:  Woon Cho Kim; Andre R Campbell
Journal:  Curr Surg Rep       Date:  2021-03-09

4.  Incidence of Emergency Department Visits for Electric Rental Scooters Using Detailed Ridership Data.

Authors:  Chelsea Williams; Cindy C Bitter; Steven Lorber; Caleb R Overfelt; Holly Zehfus; Andrea Spangler; Valerie Lew; Lawrence M Lewis; Rosanne S Naunheim
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-31

5.  E-scooter related injuries: Using natural language processing to rapidly search 36 million medical notes.

Authors:  Kimon L H Ioannides; Pin-Chieh Wang; Kamran Kowsari; Vu Vu; Noah Kojima; Dayna Clayton; Charles Liu; Tarak K Trivedi; David L Schriger; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Characteristics and comparison between e-scooters and bicycle-related trauma: a multicentre cross-sectional analysis of data from a road collision registry.

Authors:  Axel Benhamed; Amaury Gossiome; Amina Ndiaye; Karim Tazarourte
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-09-29

7.  Analysis of electric scooter user kinematics after a crash against SUV.

Authors:  Mariusz Ptak; Fábio A O Fernandes; Mateusz Dymek; Christopher Welter; Kacper Brodziński; Leszek Chybowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.