| Literature DB >> 32865539 |
Conor McClenaghan1,2, Yan Huang1,2, Scot J Matkovich3, Attila Kovacs3, Carla J Weinheimer3, Ron Perez4, Thomas J Broekelmann2, Theresa M Harter1,2, Jin-Moo Lee4, Maria S Remedi1,3, Colin G Nichols1,2.
Abstract
Dramatic cardiomegaly arising from gain-of-function (GoF) mutations in the ATP-sensitive potassium (KATP) channels genes, ABCC9 and KCNJ8, is a characteristic feature of Cantú syndrome (CS). How potassium channel over-activity results in cardiac hypertrophy, as well as the long-term consequences of cardiovascular remodeling in CS, is unknown. Using genome-edited mouse models of CS, we therefore sought to dissect the pathophysiological mechanisms linking KATP channel GoF to cardiac remodeling. We demonstrate that chronic reduction of systemic vascular resistance in CS is accompanied by elevated renin-angiotensin signaling, which drives cardiac enlargement and blood volume expansion. Cardiac enlargement in CS results in elevation of basal cardiac output, which is preserved in aging. However, the cardiac remodeling includes altered gene expression patterns that are associated with pathological hypertrophy and are accompanied by decreased exercise tolerance, suggestive of reduced cardiac reserve. Our results identify a high-output cardiac hypertrophy phenotype in CS which is etiologically and mechanistically distinct from other myocardial hypertrophies, and which exhibits key features of high-output heart failure (HOHF). We propose that CS is a genetically-defined HOHF disorder and that decreased vascular smooth muscle excitability is a novel mechanism for HOHF pathogenesis.Entities:
Keywords: ABCC9; Cantú; KATP; KCNJ8; Kir6.1; SUR2; angiotensin; blood pressure; channelopathy; high-output heart failure; renin; smooth muscle; syndrome
Year: 2020 PMID: 32865539 PMCID: PMC7446247 DOI: 10.1093/function/zqaa004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Function (Oxf) ISSN: 2633-8823
Figure 1.Cardiac Hypertrophy in Cantú Mice Is Driven by RAS. (A) Left ventricular mass from echocardiographic analysis and indexed to body weight (LVMI) and (B) cardiac output (CO) are significantly elevated, and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) is significantly reduced (C) in Kir6.1wt/VM mice. (D) Heart size (heart weight to tibia length; HW/TL) and SVR is strongly negatively correlated in WT (n = 12), SUR2wt/AV (n = 7), and Kir6.1wt/VM (n = 5) mice (Pearson correlation coefficient = −1.0). Data from SUR2wt/AV mice originally reported in Figure 2A and C in McClenaghan et al. (E) ELISA shows upregulation of plasma renin activity (left) and plasma Ang II (right) in Kir6.1wt/VM mice. Administration of captopril (Cap) results in significant reduction of heart size in Kir6.1wt/VM (F, G), and SUR2wt/AV and SUR2AV/AV mice (G). (H) Administration of losartan (Los) results in significant reversal of cardiac hypertrophy in Kir6.1wt/VM mice. Captopril (I) and losartan (J) both significantly reduce mean arterial pressures (MAP) in both WT and Kir6.1wt/VM mice. For all figures, individual data points are represented as open circles, bars show mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test (A–C, E) or one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s test for pairwise comparison (G–J). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Summary of echocardiographic measurements from young and old adult WT and Kir6.1wt/VM mice
| Young adult mice (3–5 months old) | Old mice (12 month old) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT ( | wt/VM ( |
| WT ( | wt/VM ( |
| |
| HR, bpm | 622.8 ± 9.1 | 622.8 ± 6.9 | 1.000 | 637.0 ± 14.5 | 594.4 ± 12.7 | 0.048 |
| BW, g | 24.1 ± 0.5 | 26.5 ± 1.1 | 0.071 | 32.7 ± 1.5 | 30.7 ± 0.8 | 0.261 |
| LVPWd, mm | 0.89 ± 0.02 | 1.18 ± 0.06 | <0.001 | 0.89 ± 0.02 | 1.19 ± 0.03 | <0.001 |
| IVSd, mm | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 1.18 ± 0.06 | 0.002 | 0.97 ± 0.02 | 1.22 ± 0.03 | <0.001 |
| LVIDd, mm | 3.19 ± 0.07 | 3.99 ± 0.14 | <0.001 | 3.31 ± 0.13 | 3.89 ± 0.17 | 0.016 |
| LVPWs, mm | 1.45 ± 0.05 | 1.89 ± 0.08 | <0.001 | 1.34 ± 0.04 | 1.82 ± 0.07 | <0.001 |
| IVSs, mm | 1.49 ± 0.05 | 1.91 ± 0.09 | <0.001 | 1.36 ± 0.04 | 1.84 ± 0.08 | <0.001 |
| LVIDs, mm | 1.54 ± 0.05 | 1.98 ± 0.08 | <0.001 | 1.83 ± 0.10 | 1.90 ± 0.06 | 0.558 |
| LVM, mg | 99.7 ± 5.7 | 205.5 ± 21.2 | <0.001 | 106.8 ± 5.8 | 200.7 ± 16.0 | <0.001 |
| LVMi, mg/g | 4.1 ± 0.2 | 7.7 ± 0.7 | <0.001 | 3.27 ± 0.1 | 6.61 ± 0.6 | <0.001 |
| RWT | 0.58 ± 0.02 | 0.60 ± 0.03 | 0.581 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 0.63 ± 0.03 | 0.223 |
| FS (%) | 51.6 ± 1.3 | 50.2 ± 1.1 | 0.404 | 45.0 ± 1.1 | 50.8 ± 1.9 | 0.019 |
| Doppler | ||||||
| E, cm/s | 740.4 ± 29.1 | 902.7 ± 38.7 | 0.003 | 733.6 ± 27.4 | 947.9 ± 59.3 | 0.006 |
| A, cm/s | 678.0 ± 25.1 | 746.6 ± 45.9 | 0.218 | 704.6 ± 28.5 | 835.8 ± 46.3 | 0.030 |
| E/A | 1.10 ± 0.03 | 1.25 ± 0.08 | 0.115 | 1.04 ± 0.02 | 1.14 ± 0.05 | 0.071 |
| E′, cm/s | 23.5 ± 1.2 | 23.2 ± 1.4 | 0.869 | 24.9 ± 1.5 | 24.9 ± 2.6 | 0.997 |
| A′, cm/s | 24.7 ± 1.1 | 27.1 ± 1.9 | 0.272 | 26.7 ± 1.9 | 29.9 ± 1.7 | 0.224 |
| E/E’ | 32.0 ± 1.6 | 39.6 ± 1.8 | 0.005 | 30.1 ± 2.0 | 39.2 ± 2.1 | 0.009 |
| IVCT, ms | 7.3 ± 0.5 | 6.1 ± 0.3 | 0.070 | 6.4 ± 0.3 | 6.8 ± 0.5 | 0.504 |
| IVRT, ms | 11.3 ± 0.4 | 10.0 ± 0.4 | 0.030 | 10.2 ± 0.3 | 10.4 ± 0.3 | 0.652 |
| ET, ms | 40.6 ± 1.5 | 38.9 ± 1.1 | 0.360 | 38.9 ± 1.1 | 39.8 ± 1.3 | 0.619 |
| Tei Index | 0.46 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 0.025 | 0.43 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.01 | 0.628 |
| Volumetric analysis | ||||||
| EDV, µL | 32.3 ± 1.7 | 55.4 ± 5.1 | 0.001 | 37.4 ± 2.4 | 57.6 ± 4.6 | 0.002 |
| EDVi, µL/g | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 0.001 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.2 | 0.002 |
| ESV, µL | 7.4 ± 0.7 | 14.9 ± 2.0 | 0.002 | 10.4 ± 1.3 | 15.9 ± 1.8 | 0.026 |
| SV, µL | 24.9 ± 1.2 | 40.5 ± 3.4 | <0.001 | 27.0 ± 1.3 | 41.7 ± 3.0 | <0.001 |
| SVi, µL/g | 1.0 ± 0.04 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 0.002 | 0.8 ± 0.02 | 1.4 ± 0.13 | <0.001 |
| CO, mL/min | 15.4 ± 0.8 | 24.8 ± 1.9 | <0.001 | 16.4 ± 0.8 | 24.8 ± 1.9 | 0.001 |
| CI, mL/min/g | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.94 ± 0.08 | 0.002 | 0.50 ± 0.01 | 0.82 ± 0.08 | 0.001 |
| EF (%) | 77.0 ± 1.2 | 73.1 ± 1.6 | 0.070 | 72.5 ± 1.8 | 72.4 ± 1.3 | 0.957 |
| S dV/dt, mL/s | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 1.44 ± 0.08 | <0.001 | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 1.42 ± 0.07 | <0.001 |
| S dV/dt / EDV, s−1 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.156 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.03 ± 0.002 | 0.997 |
| D dV/dt, mL/s | 0.82 ± 0.05 | 1.41 ± 0.13 | 0.001 | 1.01 ± 0.06 | 1.74 ± 0.15 | <0.001 |
| D dV/dt / EDV, s−1 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.745 | 0.03 ± 0.002 | 0.03 ± 0.001 | 0.154 |
| Strain analysis | ||||||
| Strain (radial), % | 40.0 ± 1.3 | 34.7 ± 1.2 | 0.008 | 38.8 ± 0.6 | 37.0 ± 1.2 | 0.220 |
| Strain (long), % | 20.0 ± 0.7 | 18.6 ± 0.7 | 0.182 | 23.4 ± 1.6 | 18.4 ± 1.0 | 0.016 |
| Strain rate (Rsys), s−1 | 12.5 ± 0.4 | 10.1 ± 0.5 | <0.001 | 10.4 ± 0.3 | 9.7 ± 0.4 | 0.227 |
| Strain rate (Rdiae), s−1 | 12.3 ± 0.4 | 12.3 ± 0.5 | 0.970 | 13.6 ± 0.8 | 14.9 ± 0.7 | 0.230 |
| Strain rate (Rdiaa), s−1 | 5.9 ± 0.5 | 4.7 ± 1.2 | 0.388 | 3.4 ± 0.9 | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 0.491 |
| Strain rate (Lsys), s−1 | 9.9 ± 0.5 | 9.1 ± 0.9 | 0.417 | 9.7 ± 0.6 | 7.3 ± 0.5 | 0.009 |
| Strain rate (Ldiae), s−1 | 10.9 ± 0.4 | 11.3 ± 0.8 | 0.614 | 12.3 ± 0.6 | 11.6 ± 0.7 | 0.455 |
| Strain rate (Ldiaa), s−1 | 3.9 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.4 | 0.055 | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.04 | 0.888 |
P-value < Bonferroni adjusted α (α for structural measurements = 0.05/10; for Doppler analysis = 0.05/10; for volumetric analysis = 0.05/12; for strain analysis = 0.05/8).
LVPWd, LV posterior wall in diastole; IVSd, interventricular septum in diastole; LVIDd, LV internal dimension in diastole; LVPWs, LV posterior wall in systole; IVSs, interventricular septum in systole; LVIDs, LV internal dimension in systole; LVM, LV mass; LVMi, LV mass indexed to body weight; RWT, relative wall thickness (LVPWd + IVSd/LVIDd); FS, fractional shortening; E, early mitral peak inflow velocity; A, late mitral inflow velocity; E/A, early to late mitral inflow ratio; E', early diastolic velocity of mitral annulus; A', late diastolic velocity of mitral annulus; E/E', ratio of E to E’; IVCT, isovolumetric contraction time; IVRT, isovolumetric relaxation time; ET, ejection time; Tei Index, cardiac performance index (IVCT + IVRT/ET); EDV, end-diastolic LV volume (μL) based on long-axis images; EDVi, end-diastolic LV volume indexed to body weight; ESV, end-systolic LV volume; SV, stroke volume; SVi, stroke volume indexed to body weight; CO, cardiac output; CI, cardiac index (CO indexed to body weight); EF, ejection fraction; S dV/dt, LV peak ejection rate during systole; S dV/dt/EDV, LV peak ejection rate during systole indexed to end diastolic volume; D dV/dt, maximum rate of early LV filling; D dV/dt/EDV, maximum rate of early LV filling indexed to end diastolic volume; Strain (radial), peak global radial LV myocardial strain; Strain (long), peak global longitudinal LV myocardial strain; Strain rate (Rsys), peak systolic global radial LV myocardial strain rate; Strain rate (Rdiae), peak early diastolic global radial LV myocardial strain rate; Strain rate (Rdiaa), peak late (atrial) diastolic global radial LV myocardial strain rate; Strain rate (Lsys), peak systolic global longitudinal LV myocardial strain rate; Strain rate (Ldiae), peak early diastolic global longitudinal LV myocardial strain rate; Strain rate (Ldiaa), peak late (atrial) diastolic global longitudinal LV myocardial strain rate. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 2.Blood Volume Expansion in Kir6.1wt/VM mice. (A) Example data showing TxR-A fluorescence of serial blood samples in WT (black) and Kir6.1wt/VM mice. A linear fit of the data points was extrapolated to time zero to estimate the initial dilution factor by comparison to a TxR-A standard curve (example in inset). Calculated plasma volume normalized to tibia length (B) or body weight (C) in WT and Kir6.1wt/VM mice. (D) Representative right ventricular pressure traces and summary RVSP measurements from WT and Kir6.1wt/VM mice. (E) The ratio of wet lung weight to dry lung weight for WT and Kir6.1wt/VM mice. For all figures, individual data points are represented as open circles, bars show mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.
Figure 3.RNASeq Reveals Transcriptional Remodeling in the Cantú Mouse Heart. (A) Comparison of differentially expressed genes in Kir6.1wt/VM (blue), SUR2wt/AV (orange), and SUR2AV/AV (red) mice, each compared to WT. Overlapping circles represent genes that were differentially expressed across multiple mutant lines. (B) Correlation of up- and downregulated genes (fold change >1.2 or <−1.2; FDR < 0.1) in Kir6.1wt/VM and SUR2wt/AV mice. (C) Upregulation (left) and downregulation (right) of characteristic markers of pathological hypertrophy in Kir6.1wt/VM, SUR2wt/AV, and SUR2AV/AV mice. (D) KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs (fold change either <−1.2 or >1.2 for upregulated and downregulated genes; FDR < 0.1) in Kir6.1wt/VM mice. (E) Upregulation of collagen genes in Kir6.1wt/VM mice. (F) Ventricular hydroxyproline (HyPro) content in WT and Kir6.1wt/VM mice at 3 (left) and 12 (right) months of age. †FDR < 0.05, ††FDR < 0.01.
Figure 4.High-Output Hypertrophy Is Maintained with Aging in Cantú Mice. (A) Representative M-mode echocardiograms from 12-month-old WT and Kir6.1wt/VM mice. Fractional shortening is maintained in 12-month-old Cantú mice (B) despite marked cardiac hypertrophy (C). WT mice from Kir6.1wt/VM and SUR2wt/AV/SUR2AV/AV lines were essentially identical and were combined for analysis. For all figures, individual data points are represented as open circles, bars show mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Figure 5.Exercise Tolerance Is Impaired in Cantú Mice. (A) Schematic showing the treadmill tolerance test protocol. Total work was calculated according to the equations shown, as described in Methods. Kir6.1wt/VM mice covered significantly less distance (B) and tolerated significantly reduced workloads (C). (D, E) Treadmill tolerance test data from WT, SUR2wt/AV, and SUR2AV/AV mice. For all figures, individual data points are represented as open circles, bars show mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s t-test (B, C) or ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s test (D, E). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.