Felix K F Kommoss1, Constantin Schwab, Luca Tavernar, Johannes Schreck, Willi L Wagner, Uta Merle, Danny Jonigk, Peter Schirmacher, Thomas Longerich. 1. Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg; Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University Hospital Heidelberg; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Heidelberg; Institute of Pathology, Hannover Medical School; Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Dis ease Hannover (BREATH), Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover Medical School; TI Biobank; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), - University Hospital Heidelberg.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The histomorphological changes of lung damage in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have not yet been adequately characterized. In this article, we describe the sequence of pathological changes in COVID-19 and discuss the implications for approaches to treatment. METHODS: Standardized autopsies were performed on thirteen patients who had died of COVID-19. The findings were analyzed together with clinical data from the patients' medical records. RESULTS: Most (77%) of the deceased patients were men. Their median age at death was 78 years (range, 41-90). Most of them had major pre-existing chronic diseases, most commonly arterial hypertension. The autopsies revealed characteristic COVID-19-induced pathological changes in the lungs, which were regarded as the cause of death in most patients. The main histological finding was sequential alveolar damage, apparently due in large measure to focal capillary microthrombus formation. Alveolar damage leads to the death of the patient either directly or by the induction of pulmonary parenchymal fibrosis. Diffuse lung damage was seen exclusively in invasively ventilated patients. CONCLUSION: Autopsies are crucial for the systematic assessment of new diseases such as COVID-19: they provide a basis for further investigations of disease mechanisms and for the devising of potentially effective modes of treatment. The autopsy findings suggest that focal damage of the microvascular pulmonary circulation is a main mechanism of lethal lung disease due to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It may also be a cause of persistent lung damage in patients who recover from severe COVID-19.
BACKGROUND: The histomorphological changes of lung damage in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have not yet been adequately characterized. In this article, we describe the sequence of pathological changes in COVID-19 and discuss the implications for approaches to treatment. METHODS: Standardized autopsies were performed on thirteen patients who had died of COVID-19. The findings were analyzed together with clinical data from the patients' medical records. RESULTS: Most (77%) of the deceased patients were men. Their median age at death was 78 years (range, 41-90). Most of them had major pre-existing chronic diseases, most commonly arterial hypertension. The autopsies revealed characteristic COVID-19-induced pathological changes in the lungs, which were regarded as the cause of death in most patients. The main histological finding was sequential alveolar damage, apparently due in large measure to focal capillary microthrombus formation. Alveolar damage leads to the death of the patient either directly or by the induction of pulmonary parenchymal fibrosis. Diffuse lung damage was seen exclusively in invasively ventilated patients. CONCLUSION: Autopsies are crucial for the systematic assessment of new diseases such as COVID-19: they provide a basis for further investigations of disease mechanisms and for the devising of potentially effective modes of treatment. The autopsy findings suggest that focal damage of the microvascular pulmonary circulation is a main mechanism of lethal lung disease due to the SARS-CoV-2 virus. It may also be a cause of persistent lung damage in patients who recover from severe COVID-19.
Authors: Christian Drosten; Stephan Günther; Wolfgang Preiser; Sylvie van der Werf; Hans-Reinhard Brodt; Stephan Becker; Holger Rabenau; Marcus Panning; Larissa Kolesnikova; Ron A M Fouchier; Annemarie Berger; Ana-Maria Burguière; Jindrich Cinatl; Markus Eickmann; Nicolas Escriou; Klaus Grywna; Stefanie Kramme; Jean-Claude Manuguerra; Stefanie Müller; Volker Rickerts; Martin Stürmer; Simon Vieth; Hans-Dieter Klenk; Albert D M E Osterhaus; Herbert Schmitz; Hans Wilhelm Doerr Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-04-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Daniel G Rosen; Ana E Lopez; Mary L Anzalone; Dwayne A Wolf; Sharon M Derrick; Luisa F Florez; Morna L Gonsoulin; Merrill O Hines; Roger A Mitchell; Darshan R Phatak; Kathryn Haden-Pinneri; Luis A Sanchez Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2010-08-27 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Zsuzsanna Varga; Andreas J Flammer; Peter Steiger; Martina Haberecker; Rea Andermatt; Annelies S Zinkernagel; Mandeep R Mehra; Reto A Schuepbach; Frank Ruschitzka; Holger Moch Journal: Lancet Date: 2020-04-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Dominic Wichmann; Jan-Peter Sperhake; Marc Lütgehetmann; Stefan Steurer; Carolin Edler; Axel Heinemann; Fabian Heinrich; Herbert Mushumba; Inga Kniep; Ann Sophie Schröder; Christoph Burdelski; Geraldine de Heer; Axel Nierhaus; Daniel Frings; Susanne Pfefferle; Heinrich Becker; Hanns Bredereke-Wiedling; Andreas de Weerth; Hans-Richard Paschen; Sara Sheikhzadeh-Eggers; Axel Stang; Stefan Schmiedel; Carsten Bokemeyer; Marylyn M Addo; Martin Aepfelbacher; Klaus Püschel; Stefan Kluge Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Danny Jonigk; Christopher Werlein; Peter D Lee; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Florian Länger; Maximilian Ackermann Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 8.251
Authors: Maximilian Ackermann; Christopher Werlein; Florian Länger; Mark P Kühnel; Danny D Jonigk Journal: Pathologe Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 1.011