Literature DB >> 32865374

Low-Dose Edoxaban in Very Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Ken Okumura1, Masaharu Akao1, Tetsuro Yoshida1, Masahito Kawata1, Osamu Okazaki1, Shintaro Akashi1, Kenichi Eshima1, Kimihiko Tanizawa1, Masayuki Fukuzawa1, Takuya Hayashi1, Masahiro Akishita1, Gregory Y H Lip1, Takeshi Yamashita1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implementation of appropriate oral anticoagulant treatment for the prevention of stroke in very elderly patients with atrial fibrillation is challenging because of concerns regarding bleeding.
METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven trial to compare a once-daily 15-mg dose of edoxaban with placebo in elderly Japanese patients (≥80 years of age) with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were not considered to be appropriate candidates for oral anticoagulant therapy at doses approved for stroke prevention. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of stroke or systemic embolism, and the primary safety end point was major bleeding according to the definition of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.
RESULTS: A total of 984 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a daily dose of 15 mg of edoxaban (492 patients) or placebo (492 patients). A total of 681 patients completed the trial, and 303 discontinued (158 withdrew, 135 died, and 10 had other reasons); the numbers of patients who discontinued the trial were similar in the two groups. The annualized rate of stroke or systemic embolism was 2.3% in the edoxaban group and 6.7% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19 to 0.61; P<0.001), and the annualized rate of major bleeding was 3.3% in the edoxaban group and 1.8% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.87; 95% CI, 0.90 to 3.89; P = 0.09). There were substantially more events of gastrointestinal bleeding in the edoxaban group than in the placebo group. There was no substantial between-group difference in death from any cause (9.9% in the edoxaban group and 10.2% in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.36).
CONCLUSIONS: In very elderly Japanese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who were not appropriate candidates for standard doses of oral anticoagulants, a once-daily 15-mg dose of edoxaban was superior to placebo in preventing stroke or systemic embolism and did not result in a significantly higher incidence of major bleeding than placebo. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo; ELDERCARE-AF ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02801669.).
Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32865374     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2012883

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  31 in total

1.  Low-dose edoxaban in elderly patients with AF.

Authors:  Andrew Robson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  The Atrial Fibrillation Heart Team-guiding therapy in left atrial appendage occlusion with increasingly complex patients and little evidence.

Authors:  Shinwan Kany; Andreas Metzner; Edith Lubos; Paulus Kirchhof
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guideline on pharmacological interventions for long-term secondary prevention after ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

Authors:  Jesse Dawson; Yannick Béjot; Louisa M Christensen; Gian Marco De Marchis; Martin Dichgans; Guri Hagberg; Mirjam R Heldner; Haralampos Milionis; Linxin Li; Francesca Romana Pezzella; Martin Taylor Rowan; Cristina Tiu; Alastair Webb
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2022-06-03

4.  Long-term functional outcomes and mortality after hospitalization for extracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  Anna L Parks; Sun Y Jeon; W John Boscardin; Michael A Steinman; Alexander K Smith; Kenneth E Covinsky; Margaret C Fang; Sachin J Shah
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.899

5.  Effectiveness and Safety of DOACs vs. Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Frailty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shan Zeng; Yuxiang Zheng; Jingzhou Jiang; Jianyong Ma; Wengen Zhu; Xingming Cai
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-24

6.  Serial assessment of biomarkers and the risk of stroke or systemic embolism and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation in the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial.

Authors:  Kazuma Oyama; Robert P Giugliano; David D Berg; Christian T Ruff; Petr Jarolim; Minao Tang; Sabina A Murphy; Hans J Lanz; Michael A Grosso; Elliott M Antman; Eugene Braunwald; David A Morrow
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 7.  Safety of antithrombotic therapy in East Asian patients.

Authors:  Shinya Goto; Shinichi Goto
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 8.  Factor Xa inhibitors: critical considerations for clinical development and testing.

Authors:  Richard C Becker
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Long-term individual and population functional outcomes in older adults with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Anna L Parks; Sun Y Jeon; W John Boscardin; Michael A Steinman; Alexander K Smith; Margaret C Fang; Sachin J Shah
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 7.538

10.  Prognostic impact of a history of cancer and atrial fibrillation in antithrombotic therapy for chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Kotaro Nochioka; Satoshi Yasuda; Yasuhiko Sakata; Takashi Shiroto; Hideka Hayashi; Jun Takahashi; Hiroyuki Takahama; Satoshi Miyata; Hiroaki Shimokawa
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-04-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.