Literature DB >> 32865306

Evaluation of silk-based bioink during pre and post 3D bioprinting: A review.

Sharda Gupta1, Hussam Alrabaiah2,3, Marquette Christophe4, Mohammad Rahimi-Gorji5, Sohail Nadeem6,7, Arindam Bit1.   

Abstract

During past few decades, the demand for the replacement of damaged organs is increasing consistently. This is due to the advancement in tissue engineering, which opens the possibility of regeneration of damaged organs or tissues into functional parts with the help of 3D bioprinting. Bioprinting technology presents an excellent potential to develop complex structures with precise control over cell suspension and structure. A brief description of different types of 3D bioprinting techniques, including inkjet-based, laser-based, and extrusion-based bioprinting is presented here. Due to innate advantageous features like tunable biodegradability, biocompatibility, elasticity and mechanical robustness, silk has carved a niche in the realm of tissue engineering. In this review article, the focus is to highlight the possible approach of exploring silk as bioink for fabrication of bioprinted implants using 3D bioprinting. This review discusses different type of degumming, dissolution techniques for extraction of proteins from different sources of silk. Different recently reported 3D bioprinting techniques suitable for silk-based bioink are further elaborated. Postprinting characterization of resultant scaffolds are also describe here. However, there is an astounding progress in 3D bioprinting technology, still there is a need to develop further the current bioprinting technology to make it suitable for generation of heterogeneous tissue construct. The possibility of utilizing the adhesive property of sericin to consider it as bioink is elaborated.
© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; biomimetic; bioprinting; degumming; non-mulberry silk cocoon; silk fibroin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32865306     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater        ISSN: 1552-4973            Impact factor:   3.368


  6 in total

Review 1.  3D bioprinted silk fibroin hydrogels for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Soon Hee Kim; Heesun Hong; Olatunji Ajiteru; Md Tipu Sultan; Young Jin Lee; Ji Seung Lee; Ok Joo Lee; Hanna Lee; Hae Sang Park; Kyu Young Choi; Joong Seob Lee; Hyung Woo Ju; In-Sun Hong; Chan Hum Park
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Fibroblast Derived Skin Wound Healing Modeling on Chip under the Influence of Micro-Capillary Shear Stress.

Authors:  Sharda Gupta; Lavish Patel; Kunal Mitra; Arindam Bit
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 3.  Natural Hydrogel-Based Bio-Inks for 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Engineering: A Review.

Authors:  Ahmed Fatimi; Oseweuba Valentine Okoro; Daria Podstawczyk; Julia Siminska-Stanny; Amin Shavandi
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-03-14

Review 4.  In Situ 3D Printing: Opportunities with Silk Inks.

Authors:  Francesca Agostinacchio; Xuan Mu; Sandra Dirè; Antonella Motta; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 21.942

Review 5.  Cellular Interaction of Human Skin Cells towards Natural Bioink via 3D-Bioprinting Technologies for Chronic Wound: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Syafira Masri; Mazlan Zawani; Izzat Zulkiflee; Atiqah Salleh; Nur Izzah Md Fadilah; Manira Maarof; Adzim Poh Yuen Wen; Fatih Duman; Yasuhiko Tabata; Izhar Abd Aziz; Ruszymah Bt Hj Idrus; Mh Busra Fauzi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Bioprinting Au Natural: The Biologics of Bioinks.

Authors:  Kelsey Willson; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-10-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.