Literature DB >> 32864702

Pathological nodal disease defines survival outcomes in patients with lung cancer with tumour major pathological response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Erin M Corsini1, Annikka Weissferdt2, Apar Pataer1, Nicolas Zhou1, Mara B Antonoff1, Wayne L Hofstetter1, Reza J Mehran1, Ravi Rajaram1, David C Rice1, Jack A Roth1, Ara A Vaporciyan1, Garrett L Walsh1, Tina Cascone3, John V Heymach3, Stephen G Swisher1, Boris Sepesi1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Major pathological response (MPR) is prognostic of outcomes for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and is used as the primary end point in neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials. We studied the influence of pathological nodal disease on patterns and timing of recurrence among patients with MPR.
METHODS: Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stages I-III non-small-cell lung cancer were identified. Surgical specimens were histopathologically examined for tumour viability, categorized as ≤10% viability (MPR) or >10% (NoMPR). Overall survival and disease-free survival were evaluated with emphasis upon MPR and pathological nodal disease.
RESULTS: Among 307 patients, 58 (19%) had MPR within primary tumour and 42 (14%) had MPRypN0. In the MPR group, the frequency of cN0 and cN+ disease was 18 (31%) and 40 (69%); similarly, the frequency of ypN0, ypN1 and ypN2 was 72% (42/58), 16% (9/58) and 12% (7/58), respectively. When evaluating only those with MPR, recurrence rates among those with MPRypN0, MPRypN1 and MPRypN2 were 33% (14/42), 44% (4/9) and 71% (5/7) (P = 0.16). The median time-to-recurrence in MPRypN0, MPRypN1 and MPRypN2 was 40, 10 and 14 months (P = 0.006). Distant recurrences were less common among those with MPRypN0 [MPRypN0, 26% (11/42); MPRypN1, 44% (4/9); MPRypN2, 71% (5/7); P = 0.047]. Though the median disease-free survival was prolonged among those with MPR vs NoMPR (120 vs 25 months, P < 0.0001), only those with MPRypN0 had prolonged disease-free survival in comparison to other groups upon pairwise comparisons, while MPRypN+ experienced no benefit.
CONCLUSIONS: MPRypN0 represents the most favourable surrogate end point following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with ypN1-2 are at the risk of early recurrence regardless of primary tumour MPR, warranting intensive surveillance and consideration for additional adjuvant therapy. We highlight that MPRypN0 is the most rigorous end point and should be considered as a surrogate end point in future neoadjuvant trials.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Major pathological response; Nodal metastases; Non-small-cell lung cancer; Pathological complete response

Year:  2021        PMID: 32864702     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  9 in total

1.  [Application of Neoadjuvant Immuno-chemotherapy in NSCLC].

Authors:  Si Chen; Zerui Zhao; Hao Long
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2021-04-20

2.  Different In Situ Immune Patterns between Primary Tumor and Lymph Node in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Potential Impact on Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Zheng-Hao Ye; Hao Long; Ze-Rui Zhao
Journal:  J Immunol Res       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 4.493

3.  Is major pathologic response sufficient to predict survival in resectable nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

Authors:  Jing-Sheng Cai; Shuo Li; Shu-Mei Yan; Jie Yang; Mu-Zi Yang; Chu-Long Xie; Ji-Bin Li; Yan-Fen Feng; Hao-Xian Yang; Xue Hou
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Expert consensus on perioperative immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: an editorial.

Authors:  Francesco Facchinetti; Marcello Tiseo; Luca Bertolaccini
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2021-12

5.  Surgical perspective in neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Tao Hong; Teng Sun; Miao Zhang; Xinlong Liu; Yanliang Yuan; Ponnie Robertlee Dolo; Bi Chen; Hao Zhang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant toripalimab with chemotherapy for resectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ze-Rui Zhao; Chao-Pin Yang; Si Chen; Hui Yu; Yong-Bin Lin; Yao-Bin Lin; Han Qi; Jie-Tian Jin; Shan-Shan Lian; Yi-Zhi Wang; Jin-Qi You; Wen-Yu Zhai; Hao Long
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 8.110

7.  Effect of Nursing Method of Psychological Intervention Combined with Health Education on Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jing Yu; Ting Huang; Jing Xu; Jing Xiao; Qing Chen; Lixia Zhang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.682

8.  Real-World Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors Analysis of Stages I-III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zuo Liu; Zhaoming Gao; Mengzhe Zhang; Xiaofei Wang; Jialin Gong; Shuai Jiang; Zhenfa Zhang
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Response of primary tumor and lymph node in non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant immunotherapy: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Wen-Yu Zhai; Ze-Rui Zhao; Si Chen; Hui Yu; Yao-Bin Lin; Yi-Zhi Wang; Hao Long
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 12.469

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.