Literature DB >> 32864302

The Current Mental Health Crisis of COVID-19 Pandemic Among Communities Living in Gedeo Zone Dilla, SNNP, Ethiopia, April 2020.

Chalachew Kassaw1, Digvijay Pandey2.   

Abstract

The current COVID-19 pandemic is not still controlled around the world and affects all humans' domains of day to day life. Peoples have killed themselves due to the fear of stigma by their community. This study aimed to assess the current mental health crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic among communities living in, Gedeo zone, Dilla, Ethiopia. The study was community based cross sectional design conducted from March 10-Apr 10, 2020, using a multi stage sampling techniques. Structured interview, Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21), and logistic regression analysis (95% CI, p value < 0.05) was used. This study included 420 respondents who were living in the Gedeo zone. In total, 44.4% of respondents had a psychological problem (21.4% mild and 23% moderate level of the mental crisis). Gender female, monthly income below 500 ETB, and more than three family size were variables associated with the outcome variable (p < 0.05). Nearly half of the respondents had mild to the moderate mental crisis in response to the pandemic. It is better to give mental health support for the peoples living in the zone to enhance their mental resilience. © Springer Nature India Private Limited 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anxiety; Corona virus; Depression; Dilla; Ethiopia; Stress

Year:  2020        PMID: 32864302      PMCID: PMC7446741          DOI: 10.1007/s40737-020-00192-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosoc Rehabil Ment Health


Introduction

The pandemic is continuing as the world health organization day to day work throughout the day due to its fast transmission and kills many million peoples around the world [1]. In Africa, more than nearly one million cases, 20,000 death, and in Ethiopia 17, 530, and 274 death were reported until this time [2]. The virus is too contagious and transmits to humans through contact of humans and surface, and symptoms were cough, fever, fatigue, breathing difficulty [3]. The Ethiopian ministry of health is working on the prevention of the virus at the country level by transmitting the media about the method of prevention, distributing face masks, sanitizers, and soaps [4]. During the severe acute respiratory syndrome, almost half of the non- infected communities were suffering from a mental and psychological disturbance related to the unpredictable outbreaks that happened in the world [5]. The current pandemic causes hopelessness, depression, anxiety, and suicide in all communities, infected, infected, health professionals following a few days of the outbreak [6]. The study done in china was the highest magnitude (53%) of them suffered from moderate to severe levels of the psychological problem [7]. Mental health services have been working to address the crisis through online, outpatient, and inpatient mental health services for all of the communities in need [8]. Despite this fact, there is no sufficient study done on these issues in low and middle-level countries. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of mental health crisis and associated factors related to the pandemic. This study result might be vital for generating appropriate mental health crisis management policies and plan for responding to the impact of the infection.

Methods and Materials

Study Area, Study Period and Study Design

The study was a community-based cross-sectional design conducted at the Gedeo zone from March–April 2020. It has a total population of 847,434, of whom 424,742 are men and 422,692 women, and 359 km far from Addis Ababa (the capital city of Ethiopia, the main road from Addis Ababa to Kenya crosses.

Eligibility Criteria

The inclusion criteria of this study were respondent’s age 18+ and able to listen and respond with either of the local languages, Amharic, or Gedeoffa local languages. The exclusion criteria of this study were those who weren’t able to listen to the questions asked and not present during the data collection period due to different reasons (not in the house during the data collection period, acutely or severely ill).

Sample Size Calculation

The sample size was calculated using a single proportion formula population. We used the p value of the previous study done in China 53.8% [7].where z is the reliability coefficient at a 95% confidence interval (1.96) W (margin of error) = 0.05 and N = non-response rate 10% = 38. The final total sample size was, 382 + 38 = 420.

Sampling Technique and Procedure

The sampling technique of this study was a multi-stage random sampling. Gedeo zone has seven woredas, Namely, Bule, Dilla town, Dilla zuria, Gedeb, kochere, Wenago, and Yirgacheffe. It has 179,677 households. At first, we selected all woredas in the zone. Then, we proportionally allocate to each kebeles of the hose holds found in the woredas. To select each household of the kebeles, we used simple random sampling and lottery method.

Data Collection Tools

The first part of the questioner is about the socio-demographic characteristics of respondents. The second part of the questioner was about the mental health crisis and assessed using the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) a 21- item Likert scale and sored < 30 (Normal), 30-43 (mild) and 43-59 (moderate) > 60 (severe) [9]. The third part of the questioner was about knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding the coronavirus, which has 12-items and scored as a continuous variable. The higher score is good knowledge [10].

Variables

Dependent variable—mental health crisis Independent variables- Age, sex, educational status, occupational status, family size, and monthly income, and KAP about COVID-19.

Data Collection Procedures

First we carefully designed the questioner then we trained data collectors, supervisors for about four days about the aims of the study by considering the value of privacy and confidentiality. Each day the supervisors were checked the data about its completeness.

Data Quality Control

The pretest was done on the 5% populations before two weeks of the actual data collection period. The questioner translated into the Amharic and Gedeoffa language and back-translated to English to check the consistency. The Amharic and Gedeoffa version questioner used for data collection.

Data Processing and Analysis

Data was entered into the Epi-Data 3.4 software package and exported to the Statistical Package for Social Science version 22. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies, percentages, graphs, and tables used to describe the data. Logistic regression analysis used to determine the predictor variable of outcome variable at (95 CI and p value < 0.05).

Result

Sociodemographic Characteristics Result of the Respondents

Nearly two-thirds of respondents had more than three family sizes and the average mean monthly income was 300 ETB (Table 1).
Table 1

Socio-demographic characteristics results of respondents living Gedeo zone, SNNP Ethiopia 2020 (N = 420)

VariableCategoryFrequency(n = 420)Percentage (%)
SexMale18143
Female23057
Marital statusSingle4811.4
Married28668.1
Divorced4611
Widowed409.5
Educational statusPrimary17642
Secondary13431.9
More-than secondary11026.1
OccupationPrivate job8019
Farmer22253
Government job11828
Family sizeOne348
Two9723
Three and above28968.9
Socio-demographic characteristics results of respondents living Gedeo zone, SNNP Ethiopia 2020 (N = 420)

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice About Corona Virus

Nearly half of the respondents have no information about the signs and symptoms of the coronavirus. More than two-thirds of the respondents were not using a face mask when they leave their homes. Two-third of the respondents were frustrated about the control of the virus in Ethiopia.

Mental Health Crisis

44.4% of the respondents were reported mild to moderate psychological problem.

Factors Associated with Psychological Problem

Variables associated with the outcome variable during bivariate and multi-variant logistic regression at 95% CI were female gender, less 300 ETB monthly incomes, and more than three family size. The odds of being a female’s gender 2.32 times (95% CI, 1.32-4.56) more likely to develop mental health problems in response to the pandemic. Monthly income less than 300 ETB 4.56 times (95% CI, 2.13-6.76) more likely to experience psychological problems. The last variable contributing to the psychological problem was having more than three family size 2.34 (95% CI 1.23–4.09).

Discussion

This study found 44.4% of the respondents were reported mild to moderate psychological problems in response to COVID 19 pandemic. This study finding was lower than the study done in China in response to the COVID-19 epidemic which was 53.8% [7]. It might be due to the difference in culture, literacy, mental health service, resources for controlling the pandemic. This study found that being females increase 2.32 times (95% CI, 1.32-4.56) than males for developing psychological problems in response to the pandemic. This study was supported by the study done in Italy [11] and china [7]. It might be due to their natural low-level tolerance to stress and new situation. In-addition females in this study area are highly responsible for marketing and caring for the family. This study found that the odds of monthly income less than 300 ETB has 4.56 times (95% CI 2.13–6.76) more likely to experience psychological problems as compared to their counterparts. This finding was similar to the study done in Saudi-Arabia [12]. The economic crisis the pandemic is significant in low-income countries to the extent unable to buy preventive measures including soaps and facemask. This study investigates that having more than three family size increase the chance of experiencing psychological problems by 2.34 times (95% CI 1.23–4.09) than those who are alone. This study was consistent with the study of India [13]. The number of family sizes might contribute to an economic crisis to fulfill the daily needs of each family. Moreover, the family size increases the chance of contact with different people for contracting the virus from others.

Limitation of the Study

As the study used a cross-sectional study design, no conclusions can be drawn regarding causality and alternative explanations of the findings and cannot be ruled out.

Conclusion

This study found that as there is a mental health crisis in the community living in the Gedeo zone, SNNP, Ethiopia. The most affected populations were female, low-income, and family size. Therefore it is better to work on the psychological wellbeing of the community through teaching how to handle the crisis of the pandemic during limited resources. The government should supply soaps and face masks for those who weren’t able to buy in the community. There should be a sustainable mental health task force for handling the psychological crisis of the pandemic in the community.
  8 in total

1.  A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome.

Authors:  Thomas G Ksiazek; Dean Erdman; Cynthia S Goldsmith; Sherif R Zaki; Teresa Peret; Shannon Emery; Suxiang Tong; Carlo Urbani; James A Comer; Wilina Lim; Pierre E Rollin; Scott F Dowell; Ai-Ee Ling; Charles D Humphrey; Wun-Ju Shieh; Jeannette Guarner; Christopher D Paddock; Paul Rota; Barry Fields; Joseph DeRisi; Jyh-Yuan Yang; Nancy Cox; James M Hughes; James W LeDuc; William J Bellini; Larry J Anderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-04-10       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Construct validity and internal consistency reliability of the Malay version of the 21-item depression anxiety stress scale (Malay-DASS-21) among male outpatient clinic attendees in Johor.

Authors:  B N Rusli; K Amrina; S Trived; K P Loh; M Shashi
Journal:  Med J Malaysia       Date:  2017-10

3.  Public knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19: A cross-sectional study in Malaysia.

Authors:  Arina Anis Azlan; Mohammad Rezal Hamzah; Tham Jen Sern; Suffian Hadi Ayub; Emma Mohamad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Affective temperament, attachment style, and the psychological impact of the COVID-19 outbreak: an early report on the Italian general population.

Authors:  Lorenzo Moccia; Delfina Janiri; Maria Pepe; Luigi Dattoli; Marzia Molinaro; Valentina De Martin; Daniela Chieffo; Luigi Janiri; Andrea Fiorillo; Gabriele Sani; Marco Di Nicola
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 7.217

5.  Epidemic of COVID-19 in China and associated Psychological Problems.

Authors:  Md Zahir Ahmed; Oli Ahmed; Zhou Aibao; Sang Hanbin; Liu Siyu; Akbaruddin Ahmad
Journal:  Asian J Psychiatr       Date:  2020-04-14

6.  A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern.

Authors:  Chen Wang; Peter W Horby; Frederick G Hayden; George F Gao
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Mental health in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  W Cullen; G Gulati; B D Kelly
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2020-05-01

Review 8.  Progression of Mental Health Services during the COVID-19 Outbreak in China.

Authors:  Wen Li; Yuan Yang; Zi-Han Liu; Yan-Jie Zhao; Qinge Zhang; Ling Zhang; Teris Cheung; Yu-Tao Xiang
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 6.580

  8 in total
  8 in total

1.  Alcohol use disorder and its associated factors among residents in Southern Ethiopia during the era of COVID-19.

Authors:  Habtamu Endashaw Hareru; Abdene Weya Kaso; Berhanu Gidisa Debela; Lulu Abebe; Daniel Sisay W/Tsadik; Reta Kassa Abebe; Chalachew Kassaw
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-06-20

2.  Depressive, Anxiety Symptom Frequency and Related Factors Among Prisoners During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Northeastern Ethiopia, a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Mengesha Birkie; Mogesie Necho; Mekonnen Tsehay; Habtam Gelaye; Abeba Beyene; Asmare Belete; Amare Asmamaw; Zemenu Tadesse Tessema; Kassahun Bogale; Metadel Adane
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 5.435

3.  Prevalence of Anxiety and Depression Among the General Population in Africa During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Umar Muhammad Bello; Priya Kannan; Muhammad Chutiyami; Dauda Salihu; Allen M Y Cheong; Tiev Miller; Joe Wing Pun; Abdullahi Salisu Muhammad; Fatima Ado Mahmud; Hussaina Abubakar Jalo; Mohammed Usman Ali; Mustapha Adam Kolo; Surajo Kamilu Sulaiman; Aliyu Lawan; Isma'il Muhammad Bello; Amina Abdullahi Gambo; Stanley John Winser
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-05-17

4.  Magnitude and associated factors of poor medication adherence among diabetic and hypertensive patients visiting public health facilities in Ethiopia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Tariku Shimels; Rodas Asrat Kassu; Gelila Bogale; Mahteme Bekele; Melsew Getnet; Abrham Getachew; Zewdneh Shewamene; Mebratu Abraha
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Prevalence of depression, anxiety and stress during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study among Palestinian students (10-18 years).

Authors:  Eqbal Radwan; Afnan Radwan; Walaa Radwan; Digvijay Pandey
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2021-11-30

Review 6.  Evidence Gaps and Challenges in the Fight Against COVID-19 in Africa: Scoping Review of the Ethiopian Experience.

Authors:  Esayas Kebede Gudina; Matthias Siebeck; Million Tesfaye Eshete
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-11-04

7.  COVID-19 Testing Experience in a Resource-Limited Setting: The Use of Existing Facilities in Public Health Emergency Management.

Authors:  Nega Assefa; Jemal Yousuf Hassen; Desalegn Admassu; Mussie Brhane; Mersen Deressa; Dadi Marami; Zelalem Teklemariam; Yadeta Dessie; Joseph Oundo
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-14

8.  Depression and anxiety symptoms to COVID-19 outbreak among the public, medical staff and patients during the initial phase of the pandemic: an online questionnaire survey by a WeChat Mini Program.

Authors:  Xianglan Wang; Jiong Tao; Xiaoying Wang; Nianhong Guan; Qi Zhu; Xiuhua Wu; Tong Li; Chongbang Zhao; Weirui Yang; Jinbei Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.