| Literature DB >> 32864206 |
Huiyu Hou1,2,3, Lin Zhou1,2,3, Xueying Zhang1,2,3, Te Zhao1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Botrytis cinerea causes serious gray mold disease in many plants. This pathogen has developed resistance to many fungicides. Thus, it has become necessary to look for new safe yet effective compounds against B. cinerea.Entities:
Keywords: Antifungal activity; Botanical fungicide; Botrytis cinerea; Carvacrol; Origanum vulgare; Thymol
Year: 2020 PMID: 32864206 PMCID: PMC7430266 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
A list of reports indicating antimicrobial effects of EOs isolated from the Origanum genus.
| Chemotype | Antifungal | Antibacterial | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carvacrol, thymol | ( | |||
| Carvacrol, thymol | ( | |||
| Carvacrol, thymol | ( | |||
| Carvacrol | ( | |||
| terpinen-4-ol, | ( | |||
| Carvacrol, thymol | ( |
Figure 1Inhibitory activity of 17 plant EOs on the mycelial growth of B. cinerea.
(Columns for each EOs from left to right denote 0.5 and 2.0 g/L). The fungal mycelial growth diameter of the control and treatments with different concentrations EOs were measured after 6 d of cultivation. The data were expressed as mean ± SD of three replicates. Values of different letters in the same column were significantly different at P < 0.05. The X-axis refers to different EOs, and the Y-axis refers to the inhibition rate of mycelial growth.
Chemical components of the OVEO determined by GC–MS.
| No. | Retention time | Compound | Molecular | Area (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 3.574 | Butyl acetate | C6H12O2 | 0.04 |
| 2. | 4.106 | Diacetone alcohol | C6H12O2 | 0.16 |
| 3. | 5.777 | 2-butoxyethanol | C6H14O2 | 0.03 |
| 4. | 6.532 | α-thujene | C10H16 | 0.01 |
| 5. | 6.789 | α-pinene | C10H16 | 0.07 |
| 6 | 7.384 | Camphene | C10H16 | 0.02 |
| 7 | 8.649 | β-pinene | C10H16 | 0.21 |
| 8 | 9.404 | β-myrcene | C10H16 | 0.07 |
| 9 | 10.835 | α-terpinene | C10H16 | 0.04 |
| 10 | 11.338 | 1-methyl-2-propan-2-ylbenzene | C10H14 | 1.36 |
| 11 | 11.590 | (4R)-limonene | C10H16 | 0.34 |
| 12 | 11.756 | 1,8-cineole | C10H18O | 0.12 |
| 13 | 13.038 | (E)-β-ocimene | C10H16 | 0.02 |
| 14 | 13.713 | γ-terpinene | C10H16 | 0.10 |
| 15 | 38.381 | Thymol | C10H14O | 2.39 |
| 16 | 39.903 | Carvacrol | C10H14O | 89.98 |
| 17 | 46.283 | α-copaene | C15H24 | 0.08 |
| 18 | 50.803 | (-)-β-caryophyllene | C15H24 | 3.34 |
| 19 | 54.071 | (1E,4E,8E)-α-humulene | C15H24 | 1.38 |
| 20 | 61.521 | β-cadinene | C15H24 | 0.18 |
| 21 | 66.596 | (-)-Caryophyllene oxide | C15H24O | 0.07 |
Note:
Relative proportions of EO constituents.
Figure 2GC-FID chromatogram of OVEO by an HP-5MS column.
The characterized peaks are numbered according to the serial numbers in Table 2. The chemical formulae of carvacrol and thymol are indicated next to their peaks.
Toxicities of OVEO, carvacrol and thymol against mycelial growth of B. cinerea.
| EO | Regression equation | EC50 (95% FL) (μg/mL) | χ2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OVEO | 0.9740 | 140.04 (58.07~337.72) | 7.55 | |
| Carvacrol | 0.9931 | 9.09 (3.96~20.85) | 3.72 | |
| Thymol | 0.9974 | 21.32 (9.95~45.68) | 3.99 | |
| β-caryophyllene | – | – | – | – |
Figure 3Effects of OVEO, carvacrol and thymol on inhibition of spore germination of B. cinerea.
(Columns for each concentration from left to right denote carvacrol, thymol and OVEO). The fungal germination rate of the control and treatments with different concentrations of the reagents were measured after 8 h of cultivation. The data were expressed as mean ± SD of three replicates. Values of different letters in the same column were significantly different at P < 0.05. The X-axis refers to different concentrations, and the Y-axis refers to the inhibition rate of spore germination.
Figure 4Effects of carvacrol and thymol on the mycelial morphology of Botrytis cinerea.
Images obtained by scanning electron microscopy (Model SU8010-3400N; HITACH) with 2.5 k× magnifications at 10 kV. (A) Healthy hyphae control. (B) Hyphae treated with carvacrol at 40 μg/mL. (C) Hyphae treated with thymol at 40 μg/mL.
Figure 5Effects of carvacrol and thymol against mycelial biomass of B. cinerea.
Columns for each concentration from left to right denote (A) carvacrol fresh weight A, carvacrol dry weight B, thymol fresh weight C and thymol dry weight D. (B) inhibition rate of carvacrol fresh weigh A, inhibition rate of carvacrol dry weight B, inhibition rate of thymol fresh weight C and inhibition rate of thymol dry weight D. The fungal mycelial fresh and dry of the control and treatments with different concentrations reagents were measured after 3 d of shake cultivation. The data were expressed as mean ± SD of three replicates. Significant difference (P < 0.05) between the mean values was indicated by the letters above the histogram bars.
Figure 6Effect of different concentration of carvacrol (A) and thymol (B) on membrane permeability of B. cinerea.
The fungal mycelial of the control and treatments with different concentrations reagents were measured after 108 h of shake cultivation. Values are the mean ± SD of three replicates. The X-axis refers to time, and the Y-axis refers to the relative extracellular conductivity of B. cinerea.
Figure 7Effects of carvacrol and thymol on ROS measured by fluorescence microscope.
(Nikon Eclipse Ti-S, Japan) with 600× magnifications. First row: bright field. Second row: H2DCFDA. (A) and (D) untreated; (B) and (E) treated with carvacrol at 100 μg/mL; (C) and (F) treated with thymol at 100 μg/mL.
Figure 9Effects of carvacrol and thymol on mitochondrial integrity measured by fluorescence microscope.
(Nikon Eclipse Ti-S, Japan) with 200× magnifications. First row: bright field. Second row: rhodamine 123. (A) and (D) untreated; (B) and (E) treated with carvacrol at 200 μg/mL; (C) and (F) treated with thymol at 200 μg/mL.
Figure 8Effects of carvacrol and thymol on plasma membrane integrity measured by fluorescence microscope.
(Nikon Eclipse Ti-S, Japan) with 600× magnifications. First row: bright field. Second row: SYTOX green. (A) and (D) untreated; (B) and (E) treated with carvacrol at 200 μg/mL; (C) and (F) treated with thymol at 200 μg/mL.
Protective and therapeutic effects of OVEO, carvacrol and thymol against tomato gray mold cuased by B. cinerea.
| Reagents | Concentration (μg/mL) | Protective effects | Therapeutic effects | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patch diameter (cm) | Relative efficacy (%) | Patch diameter (cm) | Relative efficacy (%) | |||
| OVEO | 500 | 2.01 ± 0.20 b | 18.88 d | 2.49 ± 0.22 b | 9.41 c | |
| 1,000 | 1.52 ± 0.23 cd | 38.50 b | 2.21 ± 0.24 cd | 19.70 ab | ||
| Carvacrol | 500 | 1.50 ± 0.23 cd | 39.40 b | 2.39 ± 0.28 bc | 13.32 bc | |
| 1,000 | 0.54 ± 0.21 e | 77.98 a | 1.98 ± 0.44 d | 28.04 a | ||
| Thymol | 500 | 1.75 ± 0.23 c | 29.29 c | 2.47 ± 0.28 bc | 10.36 bc | |
| 1,000 | 1.34 ± 0.27 d | 45.92 b | 2.02 ± 0.19 d | 26.50 a | ||
| Pyrimethanil | 400 | 1.41 ± 0.38 d | 43.15 b | 2.02 ± 0.26 d | 26.56 a | |
| Control | 0 | 2.47 ± 0.22 a | 0.00 e | 2.75 ± 0.21 a | 0.00 e | |
Note:
Values are expressed as the means ± SE of nine replicates. Different letters in each column indicate statistically significant differences (P < 0.05).