| Literature DB >> 32863991 |
Adam R Poliwczak1, Jolanta Białkowska2, Joanna Woźny2, Marzena Koziróg3, Agnieszka Bała4, Maciej Jabłkowski2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular diseases are ranked as the third cause of mortality among people infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), but the relationship of infection with cardiovascular risk remains disputable. We have focused on the comprehensive use of parameters obtainable during long-term electrocardiographic (ECG) Holter monitoring.Entities:
Keywords: ECG Holter; cardiovascular risk; chronic C hepatitis
Year: 2020 PMID: 32863991 PMCID: PMC7444696 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2020.96600
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Comparison of basic parameters in the study groups. The results are presented as mean values ± standard deviation
| Feature | Hepatitis C ( | Control ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age [years] | 34.08 ±13.73 | 30.53 ±7.65 | 0.797 |
| Weight [kg] | 75.83 ±14.63 | 69.70 ±16.63 | 0.166 |
| Height [cm] | 172.78 ±11.85 | 170.10 ±11.25 | 0.337 |
| BMI [kg/m2] | 25.32 ±3.81 | 23.80 ±4.06 | 0.166 |
| Max HR [beats/min] | 141.78 ±18.37 | 144.90 ±13.45 | 0.503 |
| Min HR [beats/min] | 47.58 ±9.58 | 43.20 ±4.28 | 0.033 |
| Mean HR [beats/min] | 77.64 ±9.37 | 72.30 ±7.91 | 0.033 |
BMI – body mass index, HR – heart rate.
Comparison of basic biochemical and morphological parameters. The results are presented as mean values ± standard deviation
| Feature | Hepatitis C ( | Control ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALT [U/l] | 55.56 ±31.00 | 16.57 ±6.11 | < 0.001 |
| AST [U/l] | 40.00 ±20.36 | 19.27 ±4.47 | < 0.001 |
| WBC [thousand/ml] | 6.12 ±1.35 | 6.51 ±1.19 | 0.322 |
| PLT [thousand/ml] | 198.22 ±64.52 | 218.53 ±46.32 | 0.169 |
| TSH [mU/l] | 2.44 ±1.60 | 1.99 ±0.82 | 0.543 |
| TC [mg/dl] | 166.75 ±31.35 | 165.77 ±25.01 | 0.865 |
| HDL [mg/dl] | 60.04 ±13.84 | 53.45 ±9.68 | 0.143 |
| TGL [mg/dl] | 96.45 ±35.97 | 100.23 ±35.48 | 0.562 |
| Tbil [mg/dl] | 0.798 ±0.85 | 0.55 ±0.24 | 0.250 |
| Albumin [g/l] | 45.63 ±4.66 | 46.08 ±3.08 | 0.835 |
Comparison of parameters from 24-hour Holter monitoring. The results are presented as the median, maximum and minimum values
| Variable | Hepatitis C ( | Control ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SDNN [ms] | 159.50 (62.00; 254.00) | 161.50 (121.00; 256.00) | 0.619886 |
| SDNN-ix [ms] | 64.50 (20.00; 115.00) | 69.00 (43.00; 124.00) | 0.177933 |
| SDANN [ms] | 144.00 (33.00; 224.00) | 140.0 (81.00; 211.00) | 0.928136 |
| r-MSSD [ms] | 29.50 (9.00; 81.00) | 38.00 (22.00; 74.00) | 0.022897 |
| p50NN (%) | 7.50 (0.00; 42.00) | 15.50 (3.00; 43.00) | 0.010250 |
| TP [ms2] | 3667.35 (436.80; 12,093.00) | 4530.60 (1826.70; 13725.00) | 0.090240 |
| HF [ms2] | 265.20 (21.90; 1570.60) | 393.70 (166.70; 1182.80) | 0.034067 |
| LF [ms2] | 937.10 (53.60; 1913.60) | 1003.55 (441.00; 2033.60) | 0.204445 |
| VLF [ms2] | 2452.75 (343.60; 8521,00) | 3138.75 (1209.40; 10416.70) | 0.076489 |
| ULF [ms2] | 15.65 (2.70; 121.10) | 21.75 (9.70; 90.80) | 0.154506 |
| LF/HF | 3.15 (1.20; 16.90) | 2.40 (1.70; 4.70) | 0.093615 |
| AC | –9.00 (–10.00; –2.63) | –9.96 (–10.00; –6.55) | 0.024673 |
| DC | 7.81 (2.67; 10.00) | 8.66 (6.02; 10.00) | 0.033858 |
| To | –5.07 (–9.17; 10.71) | –3.15 (–9.62; –0.06) | 0.808508 |
| Ts | 20.30 (2.40; 36.70) | 15.20 (9.70; 61.60) | 0.823298 |
| QTc day | 443.50 (397.00; 490.00) | 438.00 (414.00; 476.00) | 0.273066 |
| QTc night | 448.00 (413.00; 486.00) | 434.00 (417.00; 473.00) | 0.022867 |
| Total QRS | 113.50 (72.00; 212,00) | 101.00 (94.00; 178,00) | 0.233021 |
| LAS < 40 ms | 29.00 (9.00; 79,00) | 30.50 (15.00; 55,00) | 0.170336 |
| RMS voltage | 100.00 (4.00; 477.00) | 48.00 (11.00; 395.00) | 0.633518 |
SDNN – standard deviation of NN intervals, SDNN-ix – the average of the standard deviations of successive intervals NN from the 5-minute test periods, SDANN – standard deviation of averaged NN intervals, r-MSSD – root mean square successive differences, p50NN – percentage of differences between adjacent NN intervals that are greater than 50 ms, TP – total power, HF – high frequency, LF – low frequency, VLF – very low frequency, ULF – ultra low frequency, AC – acceleration capacity, DC – deceleration capacity, To – turbulence onset, Ts – turbulence slope, LAS < 40 – amount of time that the QRS complex remains below 40 µV, RMS 40 – root mean square voltage of the terminal 40 ms of the QRS complex.
Figure 1Correlations of root mean square successive differences (rMSDD), percentage of differences between adjacent NN intervals that are greater than 50 ms (p50NN), acceleration capacity (AC) and deceleration capacity (DC) with albumin levels