Francesca Bevilacqua1, Francesco Morini2, Benedetta Ragni3, Annabella Braguglia2, Simonetta Gentile4, Antonio Zaccara5, Pietro Bagolan2, Lucia Aite4. 1. Unit of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: francesca.bevilacqua@opbg.net. 2. Department of Neonatal Medicine and Surgery, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy. 3. Department of Human Studies, LUMSA University, Rome, Italy. 4. Unit of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neuroscience and Neurorehabilitation, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy. 5. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pediatric medical traumatic stress (PMTS) is a psychological and physiological response of children and their families to pain, serious illness, and invasive medical procedures. We aimed to apply the PMTS model to parents of newborns operated at birth for a congenital malformation and to identify clinical and sociodemographic risk factors associated with PMTS symptoms at 6 months. METHODS: We designed a cross-sectional study to assess PMTS symptoms (avoidance, arousal, reexperiencing) in parents of six months children operated on for a congenital anomaly, with the Italian version of the Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R). RESULTS: One-hundred-seventy parents form the object of the study. Eighty-two parents (48.2%) fell over the clinical cut-off. Ventilatory time (p = 0.0001), length of hospital stay (p = 0.0001), associated anomalies (p = 0.0002), medical devices at discharge (p = 0.0001) and Bayley motor scale (p = 0.0002) were significantly correlated with IES-R Total and Subscale Scores. Multivariate linear regression showed length of hospital stay and number of associated anomalies as significant predictors of IES-R Scores. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless the type of anomaly and sociodemographic factors, it is the clinical history of the child which seems to predict the severity of PMTS symptoms in this population of parents. PMTS represents a useful model to describe the psychological reactions of parents of newborns operated at birth for a congenital malformation. NICU and outpatient pediatric staff should be aware of risk factors to identify families who may request early multidisciplinary interventions since the first admission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis study, level II.
BACKGROUND: Pediatric medical traumatic stress (PMTS) is a psychological and physiological response of children and their families to pain, serious illness, and invasive medical procedures. We aimed to apply the PMTS model to parents of newborns operated at birth for a congenital malformation and to identify clinical and sociodemographic risk factors associated with PMTS symptoms at 6 months. METHODS: We designed a cross-sectional study to assess PMTS symptoms (avoidance, arousal, reexperiencing) in parents of six months children operated on for a congenital anomaly, with the Italian version of the Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R). RESULTS: One-hundred-seventy parents form the object of the study. Eighty-two parents (48.2%) fell over the clinical cut-off. Ventilatory time (p = 0.0001), length of hospital stay (p = 0.0001), associated anomalies (p = 0.0002), medical devices at discharge (p = 0.0001) and Bayley motor scale (p = 0.0002) were significantly correlated with IES-R Total and Subscale Scores. Multivariate linear regression showed length of hospital stay and number of associated anomalies as significant predictors of IES-R Scores. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless the type of anomaly and sociodemographic factors, it is the clinical history of the child which seems to predict the severity of PMTS symptoms in this population of parents. PMTS represents a useful model to describe the psychological reactions of parents of newborns operated at birth for a congenital malformation. NICU and outpatient pediatric staff should be aware of risk factors to identify families who may request early multidisciplinary interventions since the first admission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis study, level II.
Authors: David Paul Turgoose; Stephanie Kerr; Paolo De Coppi; Simon Blackburn; Simon Wilkinson; Natasha Rooney; Richard Martin; Suzanne Gray; Lee Duncan Hudson Journal: BMJ Paediatr Open Date: 2021-07-16