Literature DB >> 32862358

Very high and low residual spenders in private health insurance markets: Germany, The Netherlands and the U.S. Marketplaces.

Thomas G McGuire1, Sonja Schillo2, Richard C van Kleef3.   

Abstract

We study the extremely high and low residual spenders in individual health insurance markets in three countries. A high (low) residual spender is someone for whom the residual-spending less payment (from premiums and risk adjustment)-is high (low), indicating that the person is highly underpaid (overpaid). We begin with descriptive analysis of the top and bottom 1% and 0.1% of residuals building to address the question of the degree of persistence in membership at the extremes. Common findings emerge among the countries. First, the diseases found among those with the highest residual spending are also disproportionately found among those with the lowest residual spending. Second, those at the top of the residual spending distribution (where spending exceeds payments the most) account for a massively high share of the unexplained variance in the predictions from the risk adjustment model. Third, in terms of persistence, we find that membership in the extremes of the residual spending distribution is highly persistent, raising concerns about selection-related incentives targeting these individuals. As our results show, the one-in-a-thousand people (on both sides of the residual distribution) play an outsized role in creating adverse incentives associated with health plan payment systems. In response to the observed importance of the extremes of the residual spending distribution, we propose an innovative combination of risk-pooling and reinsurance targeting the predictively undercompensated group. In all three countries, this form of risk sharing substantially improves the overall fit of payments to spending. Perhaps surprisingly, by reducing the burden on diagnostic indicators to predict high payments, our proposed risk sharing policy reduces the gap between payments and spending not only for the most undercompensated individuals but also for the most overcompensated people.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health insurance; Risk adjustment; Risk selection; Risk sharing

Year:  2020        PMID: 32862358      PMCID: PMC7822791          DOI: 10.1007/s10198-020-01227-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  1 in total

1.  Mandatory high-risk pooling: an approach to reducing incentives for cream skimming.

Authors:  E M van Barneveld; R C van Vliet; W P van de Ven
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.730

  1 in total
  3 in total

1.  Sex differences in care complexity and cost of cardiac-related procedures as a basis for improving hospital payments systems.

Authors:  Shuli Brammli-Greenberg; Sharvit Fialco; Neria Shtauber; Yoram Weiss
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2022-07-21

2.  Association of Funding Cuts to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Navigator Program With Privately Sponsored Television Advertising.

Authors:  Rebecca Myerson; David M Anderson; Laura M Baum; Erika Franklin Fowler; Sarah E Gollust; Paul R Shafer
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-08-01

Review 3.  Adopting localised health financing models for universal health coverage in Low and middle-income countries: lessons from the National Health lnsurance Scheme in Ghana.

Authors:  Maximillian Kolbe Domapielle
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-06-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.