Eleni K Konstantinou1, Luísa S M Mendonça2, Phillip Braun3, Kyle M Monahan4, Nihaal Mehta5, Isaac Gendelman1, Emily S Levine1, Caroline R Baumal1, Andre J Witkin1, Jay S Duker1, Nadia K Waheed6. 1. New England Eye Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. New England Eye Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. 3. New England Eye Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 4. Data Lab, Tufts Technology Services, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts. 5. New England Eye Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 6. New England Eye Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: nadiakwaheed@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of a high-magnification module (HMM) lens to visualize retinal photoreceptors, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and superficial retinal vasculature in physiologic and pathologic retinal conditions. DESIGN: Observational descriptive study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two participants with normal and pathologic retina examination results. METHODS: Normal and pathologic maculae were imaged in vivo using still and video HMM lens modes, with fixation and contrast adjustments to enhance visualization. The HMM images were classified qualitatively based on structures identified as either good (photoreceptors seen), average (photoreceptor mosaic cannot be visualized clearly, retinal vessels and other retinal changes can be seen), or poor (no identifiable structures). Selected eyes were imaged with fundus photography, OCT, OCT angiography, indocyanine green angiography, and fluorescein angiography for comparison with the pathologic maculae. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Description of HMM module-obtained macula images. RESULTS: From 32 eyes imaged (16 normal and 16 pathologic retinas), 12 of 16 normal and 11 of 16 pathologic retinas demonstrated at least average image quality, in which retinal vasculature and landmarks could be visualized. The mosaic pattern of hexagonal shapes representing photoreceptors could not be resolved in most pathologic retinas. For the retinas in which the photoreceptor mosaics were visualized (12 of 16 normal and 2 of 16 pathologic retinas), parafoveal mosaic patterns appeared denser with better image quality for all participants compared with foveal photoreceptors. Difficulty in resolving the photoreceptors in the umbo, fovea, and perifovea was encountered, similar to what has been reported with adaptive optics devices. The RNFL was seen as arcuate hyperreflective bundles. Flow was observed in the macular microvasculature. Poorly resolved photoreceptors and scattered hyperreflective foci were correlated with changes in the retinal pigment epithelium in eyes with age-related macular degeneration or central serous chorioretinopathy. Macular striae were seen in eyes with epiretinal membrane. CONCLUSIONS: In most eyes, regardless of whether retinal pathologic features were present, it was challenging to obtain average quality (or better) images. In the few participants with good-quality imaging, the parafoveal photoreceptor mosaic, vascular flow, and various features of pathologic eyes could be visualized.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the usefulness of a high-magnification module (HMM) lens to visualize retinal photoreceptors, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and superficial retinal vasculature in physiologic and pathologic retinal conditions. DESIGN: Observational descriptive study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two participants with normal and pathologic retina examination results. METHODS: Normal and pathologic maculae were imaged in vivo using still and video HMM lens modes, with fixation and contrast adjustments to enhance visualization. The HMM images were classified qualitatively based on structures identified as either good (photoreceptors seen), average (photoreceptor mosaic cannot be visualized clearly, retinal vessels and other retinal changes can be seen), or poor (no identifiable structures). Selected eyes were imaged with fundus photography, OCT, OCT angiography, indocyanine green angiography, and fluorescein angiography for comparison with the pathologic maculae. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Description of HMM module-obtained macula images. RESULTS: From 32 eyes imaged (16 normal and 16 pathologic retinas), 12 of 16 normal and 11 of 16 pathologic retinas demonstrated at least average image quality, in which retinal vasculature and landmarks could be visualized. The mosaic pattern of hexagonal shapes representing photoreceptors could not be resolved in most pathologic retinas. For the retinas in which the photoreceptor mosaics were visualized (12 of 16 normal and 2 of 16 pathologic retinas), parafoveal mosaic patterns appeared denser with better image quality for all participants compared with foveal photoreceptors. Difficulty in resolving the photoreceptors in the umbo, fovea, and perifovea was encountered, similar to what has been reported with adaptive optics devices. The RNFL was seen as arcuate hyperreflective bundles. Flow was observed in the macular microvasculature. Poorly resolved photoreceptors and scattered hyperreflective foci were correlated with changes in the retinal pigment epithelium in eyes with age-related macular degeneration or central serous chorioretinopathy. Macular striae were seen in eyes with epiretinal membrane. CONCLUSIONS: In most eyes, regardless of whether retinal pathologic features were present, it was challenging to obtain average quality (or better) images. In the few participants with good-quality imaging, the parafoveal photoreceptor mosaic, vascular flow, and various features of pathologic eyes could be visualized.
Authors: Niamh Wynne; Heather Heitkotter; Erica N Woertz; Robert F Cooper; Joseph Carroll Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 3.048
Authors: Timo W F Mulders; B Jeroen Klevering; Carel B Hoyng; Thomas Theelen Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2021-08-06 Impact factor: 3.117