Literature DB >> 32860854

Association between patient race and staff resuscitation efforts after cardiac arrest in outpatient dialysis clinics: A study from the CARES surveillance group.

Samuel A Hofacker1, Matthew E Dupre2, Kimberly Vellano3, Bryan McNally3, Monique Anderson Starks4, Myles Wolf5, Laura P Svetkey6, Patrick H Pun7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac arrest is the leading cause of death among patients receiving hemodialysis. Despite guidelines recommending CPR training and AED presence in dialysis clinics, rates of CPR and AED use by dialysis staff are suboptimal. Given that racial disparities exist in bystander CPR administration in non-healthcare settings, we examined the relationship between patient race/ethnicity and staff-initiated CPR and AED application within dialysis clinics.
METHODS: We analyzed data prospectively collected in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival across the U.S. from 2013 to 2017 and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services dialysis facility database to identify outpatient dialysis clinic cardiac arrest events. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we examined relationships between patient race/ethnicity and dialysis staff-initiated CPR and AED application.
RESULTS: We identified 1568 cardiac arrests occurring in 809 hemodialysis clinics. The racial/ethnic composition of patients was 31.3% white, 32.9% Black, 10.7% Hispanic/Latinx, 2.7% Asian, and 22.5% other/unknown. Overall, 88.0% of patients received CPR initiated by dialysis staff, but rates differed by race: 91% of white patients, 85% of black patients, and 77% of Asian patients (p = 0.005). After adjusting for differences in patient and clinic characteristics, black (OR = 0.41, 95% CI 0.25-0.68) and Asian patients (OR = 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.65) were significantly less likely than white patients to receive staff-initiated CPR. No significant difference between staff-initiated CPR rates among white, Hispanic/Latinx, and other/unknown patients was observed. An AED was applied by dialysis staff in 62% of patients. In adjusted models, there was no relationship between patient race/ethnicity and staff AED application.
CONCLUSIONS: Black and Asian patients are significantly less likely than white patients to receive CPR from dialysis staff. Further understanding of practices in dialysis clinics and increased awareness of this disparity are necessary to improve resuscitation practices. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Cardiovascular events; Dialysis complications; Hemodialysis; Racial disparity

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32860854      PMCID: PMC7606705          DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.07.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  42 in total

1.  Overcoming the absence of socioeconomic data in medical records: validation and application of a census-based methodology.

Authors:  N Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Outcomes for Hemodialysis Patients Given Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Cardiac Arrest at Outpatient Dialysis Clinics.

Authors:  Patrick H Pun; Matthew E Dupre; Monique A Starks; Clark Tyson; Kimberly Vellano; Laura P Svetkey; Steen Hansen; Brian G Frizzelle; Bryan McNally; James G Jollis; Sana M Al-Khatib; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  Implicit Racial/Ethnic Bias Among Health Care Professionals and Its Influence on Health Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  William J Hall; Mimi V Chapman; Kent M Lee; Yesenia M Merino; Tainayah W Thomas; B Keith Payne; Eugenia Eng; Steven H Day; Tamera Coyne-Beasley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Hospital-level racial disparities in acute myocardial infarction treatment and outcomes.

Authors:  Amber E Barnato; F Lee Lucas; Douglas Staiger; David E Wennberg; Amitabh Chandra
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage.

Authors:  B Jennett; M Bond
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Association of neighborhood characteristics with incidence of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and rates of bystander-initiated CPR: implications for community-based education intervention.

Authors:  Emil L Fosbøl; Matthew E Dupre; Benjamin Strauss; Douglas R Swanson; Brent Myers; Bryan F McNally; Monique L Anderson; Akshay Bagai; Lisa Monk; J Lee Garvey; Matthew Bitner; James G Jollis; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 5.262

7.  Impact of quality improvement efforts on race and sex disparities in hemodialysis.

Authors:  Ashwini R Sehgal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Socioeconomic status is associated with provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Michael J Mitchell; Benjamin A Stubbs; Mickey S Eisenberg
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 9.  Physicians and implicit bias: how doctors may unwittingly perpetuate health care disparities.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Chapman; Anna Kaatz; Molly Carnes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Training Disparities in the United States.

Authors:  Audrey L Blewer; Said A Ibrahim; Marion Leary; David Dutwin; Bryan McNally; Monique L Anderson; Laurie J Morrison; Tom P Aufderheide; Mohamud Daya; Ahamed H Idris; Clifton W Callaway; Peter J Kudenchuk; Gary M Vilke; Benjamin S Abella
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 5.501

View more
  1 in total

1.  Facility-Level Factors and Racial Disparities in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation within US Dialysis Clinics.

Authors:  Patrick H Pun; Laura P Svetkey; Bryan McNally; Matthew E Dupre
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2022-03-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.