| Literature DB >> 32860802 |
Wolfgang Marx1, Andrew Scholey2, Joseph Firth3, Nathan M D'Cunha4, Melissa Lane5, Meghan Hockey5, Melanie M Ashton5, John F Cryan6, Adrienne O'Neil7, Nenad Naumovski4, Michael Berk8, Olivia M Dean5, Felice Jacka5.
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate randomized controlled trials that investigated the use of probiotic, prebiotic, and fermented food interventions for cognitive performance. In total, 22 studies (n = 1551) were included that investigated probiotics (11 studies, n = 724), prebiotics (5 studies, n = 355), and fermented foods (6 studies, n = 472). Despite several individual studies (14 of 22) reporting significant improvements in specific cognitive domains, results of the pooled meta-analysis found no significant effect for any intervention for global cognition (Probiotics: g = 0.115, 95 %CI -0.041, 0.270, p = 0.148; Prebiotics: g = 0.077, 95 %CI -0.091, 0.246, p = 0.369; Fermented food: g = 0.164 95 %CI -0.017, 0.345, p = 0.076) or any individual cognitive domain. Most studies (16 of 22) had low risk of bias. These results do not support the use of probiotic, prebiotic, and fermented food interventions for cognitive outcomes. This may be due to the limited number of small and short-term studies as well clinical heterogeneity relating to the population, cognitive tests, and intervention. Therefore, further trials that investigate these interventions in clinical populations using adequately powered samples are warranted. PROSPERO: CRD42019137936.Entities:
Keywords: Cognition; Fermented foods; Meta-analysis; Prebiotic; Probiotic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32860802 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.07.036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev ISSN: 0149-7634 Impact factor: 8.989