Literature DB >> 32860510

A High-Throughput Assay for Circulating Antibodies Directed Against the S Protein of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.

Svenja Weiss1, Jéromine Klingler1, Catarina Hioe1,2,3, Fatima Amanat3,4, Ian Baine5, Suzanne Arinsburg5, Erna Milunka Kojic6, Jonathan Stoever7, Sean T H Liu3, Denise Jurczyszak3, Maria Bermudez-Gonzalez3, Viviana Simon1,3,8, Florian Krammer3, Susan Zolla-Pazner1,3.   

Abstract

More than 24 million infections with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) were confirmed globally by September 2020. While polymerase chain reaction-based assays are used for diagnosis, there is a need for high-throughput, rapid serologic methods. A Luminex binding assay was developed and used to assess simultaneously the presence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-specific antibodies in human serum and plasma. Clear differentiation was achieved between specimens from infected and uninfected subjects, and a wide range of serum/plasma antibody levels was delineated in infected subjects. All 25 specimens from 18 patients with COVID-19 were positive in the assays with both the trimeric spike and the receptor-binding domain proteins. None of the 13 specimens from uninfected subjects displayed antibodies to either antigen. There was a highly statistically significant difference between the antibody levels of COVID-19-infected and -uninfected specimens (P < .0001). This high-throughput antibody assay is accurate, requires only 2.5 hours, and uses 5 ng of antigen per test.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; antibodies; antibody assay; coronavirus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32860510      PMCID: PMC7499578          DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) techniques are currently used for the qualitative detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acids in specimens from the upper and lower respiratory tracts [1, 2]. While molecular testing has been well established in clinical laboratories throughout the world for 2 decades, testing of serum and other bodily fluids for antibodies (Abs) to infectious diseases such as syphilis, typhoid, and diphtheria has been used for more than a century [3, 4]. Antibody assays are most useful for identifying individuals who have been previously exposed to a particular pathogen. As such, they can be especially valuable, for example, for identification of persons who have had asymptomatic viral infections and for those who have recovered and would no longer be positive in tests for viral nucleic acids. Antibody tests in the context of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic are also critical for serosurveillance, for identification of donors for COVID-19 convalescent plasma therapy, and to identify individuals who are potentially immune to reinfection, though this has not yet been established. Antibody assays thus fill an essential gap both during and after the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. In fact, 1 study found that, depending on the time of testing postinfection, the combined use of RT-PCR and Ab positivity provided an advantage over either test alone [5]. We and others [5-7] have described tests for assessing the presence of Abs to SARS-CoV-2 in serum and plasma using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) platform with a recombinant form of the S protein of the virus and the central portion of this molecule identified as the receptor binding domain (RBD), consisting of amino acids 319–541 of the S protein [7-9]. We report here a bead-based multiplex immunoassay in which bead sets labeled with 2 different fluorochrome signatures are coated with the soluble recombinant S protein or RBD. The 2 coated bead sets are incubated simultaneously with serum or plasma, then with biotinylated antihuman total immunoglobulin Abs, and finally with phycoerythrin (PE)–labeled streptavidin. The readout is performed with a laser-based instrument. This is a high-throughput assay that offers the advantages of being able to prepare the antigen-coated beads for thousands of tests in a single day and using 20-fold less antigen than is required for ELISA. It also allows assessment of Abs to RBD and S protein simultaneously, thus providing a screen and titrated confirmatory test in a single step. In the setting of hospitals and regional reference laboratories, results on thousands of specimens per day can be generated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Recombinant Proteins

The recombinant S and RBD proteins were produced as previously described [7] in Expi293F cells (ThermoFisher) by transfections of purified DNA using an ExpiFectamine Transfection Kit (ThermoFisher). The soluble version of the spike protein included the S protein ectodomain (amino acids 1–1213), a C-terminal thrombin cleavage site, a T4 foldon trimerization domain, and a hexahistidine tag. The protein sequence was modified to remove the polybasic cleavage site (RRAR to A) and 2 stabilizing mutations (K986P and V987P, wild-type numbering). The RBD (amino acids 319–541) also contained a hexahistidine tag. Supernatants from transfected cells were harvested on day 3 posttransfection by centrifugation of the culture at 4000g for 20 minutes. Supernatant was then incubated with 6 mL Ni-NTA agarose (Qiagen) for 1–2 hours at room temperature. Next, gravity flow columns were used to collect the Ni-NTA agarose and the protein was eluted. Each protein was concentrated in Amicon centrifugal units (EMD Millipore) and resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).

Human Samples

Banked serum samples were obtained from study participants enrolled in 2 institutional review board (IRB)–approved longitudinal observational protocols (Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai; principal investigator: Dr V. Simon; IRB-16-00772 and IRB-16-00791). All participants provided written consent at study enrollment and agreed to sample banking and future research use of their banked biospecimen. Specimens from these protocols included sera from 4 participants with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection: specimens from P1 (3 time points), P2 (2 time points), and P3 and P4 (1 time point each). In addition, sera were used that had been collected from 3 healthy donors (N1, N2, and N3) in October and November 2019, prior to the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States. Four additional de-identified serum specimens (P5–P8) were provided by the Clinical Pathology Division of the Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Twenty-four plasma specimens were also used from the Division of Transfusion Medicine of the Department of Pathology, Molecular and Cell-Based Medicine: 14 were segments from citrated plasma units collected from convalescent COVID-19 subjects that were destined for transfusion to SARS-CoV-2–infected subjects (TF1–TF14). A pool of 0.1 mL from each of these specimens was created (convalescent plasma pool) to use as a positive control. An additional 10 specimens were derived from the general blood bank plasma inventory (N4–N13), which represented standard nonconvalescent plasma donors. A pool of 0.1 mL from each of these specimens was created (nonconvalescent plasma pool) and used as a negative control. Table 1 provides an overview of the specimens studied.
Table 1.

Characteristics of Patients Whose Specimens Were Tested

Specimen IDaSARS-CoV-2 PCR ResultType of SpecimenSymptoms Suggestive of COVID-19Days After Symptom Onset and Serum CollectionCOVID-19 Severity
P1aPositiveSerumYes8Severe
P1bPositiveSerumYes11Severe
P1cPositiveSerumYes15Severe
P2aPositiveSerumYes7Severe
P2bPositiveSerumYes10Severe
P3PositiveSerumYes22Mild
P4InconclusiveSerumYes21Mild
P5bPositiveSerumUnknownUnknownUnknown
P6bPositiveSerumUnknownUnknownUnknown
P7bPositiveSerumUnknownUnknownUnknown
P8bPositiveSerumUnknownUnknownUnknown
TF1–TF14PositivePlasmaUnknownUnknownUnknown
Convalescent plasma poolPositivePlasmaUnknownUnknownUnknown
N1NA; collected Oct 2019PlasmaNANANA
N2NA; collected Nov 2019PlasmaNANANA
N3NA; collected Oct 2019PlasmaNANANA
N4–N13cUnknownPlasmaNANANA
Nonconvalescent plasma poolcUnknownPlasmaNANANA

Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; NA, not applicable or not available; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

aSpecimens from P: sera of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2; N: normal, uninfected individual; TF: citrated plasma from units to be used for transfusion.

bP5–P8 were de-identified.

cN4–N13 were derived from the general blood bank plasma inventory.

Characteristics of Patients Whose Specimens Were Tested Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; NA, not applicable or not available; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. aSpecimens from P: sera of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2; N: normal, uninfected individual; TF: citrated plasma from units to be used for transfusion. bP5–P8 were de-identified. cN4–N13 were derived from the general blood bank plasma inventory.

Luminex Binding Ab Assay

The SARS-CoV-2 antigens included a soluble recombinant trimerized form of the S protein and a recombinant RBD protein produced in Expi293F mammalian cells as described previously (mSpike, mRBD) [7]. Each antigen was covalently coupled individually to a uniquely labeled fluorochrome carboxylated xMAP bead set at 4.0 μg protein/million beads using a 2-step carbodiimide reaction with the xMAP Ab Coupling Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Luminex, Austin, Texas). The coupled beads were pelleted, resuspended at 5 × 105 beads/mL in storage buffer (PBS, 0.1% bovine serum albumin [BSA], 0.02% Tween-20, and 0.05% sodium azide, pH 7.4), and stored at –80°C. The beads needed for a single run (2500 beads/well × number of wells) were diluted in assay buffer (PBS, 0.1% BSA, 0.02% Tween-20) to a volume that delivered 2500 beads to each well in an aliquot of 50 μL/well. Serum/plasma was diluted in PBS, added as 50 μL/well to the wells containing the beads, and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour on a plate shaker at 600 rpm. After 2 washes with assay buffer, 100 μL/well of biotinylated antihuman total immunoglobulin (Abcam, catalog number ab97158) at 2 μg/mL was added and incubated for 30 minutes at room temperature on a plate shaker. After 2 washes, 100 μL/well of streptavidin-PE at 1 μg/mL was added (BioLegend Catalog number 405204) followed by a 30-minute incubation at room temperature on a plate shaker. After 2 additional washes, 100 μL of assay buffer/well was added and put on a shaker to resuspend the beads. The plate was read with a Luminex Flexmap 3D instrument. Samples were tested in duplicate and the results were recorded as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Serum and plasma were used for the experiments herein. Sera from uninfected individuals, drawn before the start of the COVID-19 epidemic served as negative controls, as was plasma derived from the blood bank. Figures were generated using GraphPad Prism 7.02 software.

RESULTS

A total of 25 serum and plasma specimens were tested from 18 different patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Sera from 3 uninfected individuals were used that had been banked as part of an ongoing longitudinal study prior to the COVID-19 outbreak (N1–N3), and an additional 10 plasma were obtained from blood bank donors (N4–N13). All assays for COVID-19 Abs were performed in a Biosafety Level 2 laboratory as the specimens were heat-inactivated; normal blood precautions that are employed when handling all human specimens were used for these studies. The specimens were screened for the presence of Abs reactive with fluorochrome-labeled magnetic beads coated with soluble recombinant trimeric mammalian cell–expressed S protein (mSpike) or mRBD followed by incubation with a secondary biotinylated Ab that detects total immunoglobulin and streptavidin-PE. All specimens from COVID-19 patients reacted strongly with both mRBD and mSpike. Results are shown in Figure 1 for sera from 4 patients and 3 controls, and in Figure 2 for plasma from 14 infected subjects and 13 controls, as well as from the positive and negative plasma pools. The data shown in these figures reflect a wide range of values for Abs in patients’ specimens: the range of Ab levels in the plasma specimens diluted 1:200 from COVID-19 patients against mSpike ranged from 35 888 to 121 479, and with RBD, from 47 173 to 142 998 MFI (Figure 2). The background activities in the specimens from the control subjects also showed a range of values (1316–2480 for mSpike and 1005–17 947 for mRBD). Two of the specimens from the nonconvalescent controls (N4 and N10) displayed unusually high MFI values against either (but not both) mSpike or mRBD. Since these came from the general blood bank plasma inventory, these 2 specimens may have been derived from donors who had unknowingly been infected with SARS-CoV-2. The likelihood that their Abs represented Abs that were cross-reactive due to common endemic coronaviruses is unlikely based on a previous study showing that prepandemic samples that were positive for spike proteins of endemic human coronaviruses 229E and NL63 (responsible for a large proportion of common colds each year) were negative for Abs reactive with SARS-CoV-2 Spike and RBD [7]. As shown in Figure 2, the MFI values were significantly higher in COVID-19–positive than in COVID-19–negative specimens (P < .0001 by the Mann–Whitney test, for both Spike and RBD). There was essentially no reactivity in the absence of serum or plasma (data not shown).
Figure 1.

Screening for the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibodies in specimens from coronavirus disease 2019–infected (pos.) and –uninfected (neg.) humans. Assays were run using the S protein produced in mammalian cells (mSpike, left) and mRBD (right). Results are shown using sera tested at a dilution of 1:200. For specimens from 4 patients (P1–P4) run against both antigens, the data shown are the mean + standard deviation of 2–5 experiments. For 4 patients (P5–P8), the specimens were run only against the mSpike in a single experiment. Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; mRBD, mammalian-derived Receptor Binding Domain polypeptide; mSpike, mammalian-derived Spike protein.

Figure 2.

Screening for the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibodies in plasma from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–positive subjects (COVID-19 pos.) and from plasma derived from the general blood bank plasma inventory (COVID-19 neg.). Assays were run using the S protein produced in mammalian cells: mSpike (left) and mRBD (right). Results are shown using plasma tested at a dilution of 1:200. Statistical analysis using the Mann–Whitney test is shown. Medians with error bars representing standard deviation are indicated. Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; mRBD, mammalian-derived Receptor Binding Domain polypeptide; mSpike, mammalian-derived Spike protein.

Screening for the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibodies in specimens from coronavirus disease 2019–infected (pos.) and –uninfected (neg.) humans. Assays were run using the S protein produced in mammalian cells (mSpike, left) and mRBD (right). Results are shown using sera tested at a dilution of 1:200. For specimens from 4 patients (P1–P4) run against both antigens, the data shown are the mean + standard deviation of 2–5 experiments. For 4 patients (P5–P8), the specimens were run only against the mSpike in a single experiment. Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; mRBD, mammalian-derived Receptor Binding Domain polypeptide; mSpike, mammalian-derived Spike protein. Screening for the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibodies in plasma from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–positive subjects (COVID-19 pos.) and from plasma derived from the general blood bank plasma inventory (COVID-19 neg.). Assays were run using the S protein produced in mammalian cells: mSpike (left) and mRBD (right). Results are shown using plasma tested at a dilution of 1:200. Statistical analysis using the Mann–Whitney test is shown. Medians with error bars representing standard deviation are indicated. Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; mRBD, mammalian-derived Receptor Binding Domain polypeptide; mSpike, mammalian-derived Spike protein. To determine the dynamic range of the assay and the titer of Abs present in COVID-19–positive sera, titrations were performed with sera from patients and from uninfected subjects using mSpike and mRBD. The titration curves are shown in Figure 3. A prozone effect (the phenomenon in which a value below the peak is observed at low dilutions of a specimen) is suggested by the curves generated by 6 of the sera tested against the mSpike. The prozone phenomenon was less apparent when using the mRBD antigen. Generally, the maximum MFI values were achieved with serum dilutions of 1:100 or 1:200. As noted above, the level of Abs varied greatly between patient specimens. Of interest, titration curves show that the specimens with the highest Ab levels (P1c and P2b) were from 2 different patients (P1 and P2), who presented with severe disease at the time of the blood draw (Table 1). Further study is needed to ascertain how and whether disease severity affects the level and type of Abs induced. However, it is notable that the level of Abs increased over a few days in each of the 2 patients from whom longitudinal specimens were available (P1 and P2; Table 1 and Figure 1). The factors that affect the variation in Ab responses (including severity of disease, length of infection, sex, and genetics) are yet to be determined and will require a large panel of specimens from patients accompanied by clinical and demographic data.
Figure 3.

Titration of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–positive/negative sera. Specimens were diluted at 2-fold dilutions from 1:50 to 1:6400 and tested using the Luminex assay described herein. Titration curves are shown for sera from 11 specimens from 8 infected patients using the mSpike as antigen (left) and for sera from 3 patients tested vs mRBD (right). Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; mRBD, mammalian-derived Receptor Binding Domain polypeptide; mSpike, mammalian-derived Spike protein.

Titration of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–positive/negative sera. Specimens were diluted at 2-fold dilutions from 1:50 to 1:6400 and tested using the Luminex assay described herein. Titration curves are shown for sera from 11 specimens from 8 infected patients using the mSpike as antigen (left) and for sera from 3 patients tested vs mRBD (right). Abbreviations: COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity; mRBD, mammalian-derived Receptor Binding Domain polypeptide; mSpike, mammalian-derived Spike protein.

Discussion

A rapid throughput test for SARS-CoV-2 Abs such as the Luminex bead binding Ab assay described here can serve as an essential tool for identifying individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 who have seroconverted and those who have been infected and recovered. The Ab assay will be a particularly useful assay for identifying individuals who have had asymptomatic infections, including children [10-12]. Given that there appears to be a relatively high prevalence of asymptomatic individuals who have or have had SARS-CoV-2 infection, Ab assays fill an essential gap both during and after the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic for identifying the true prevalence of infection in a given population. Since the Luminex Ab assay can simultaneously test qualitatively and quantitatively for RBD and S protein Abs, and can be performed in ≤2.5 hours (see the Materials and Methods and Figure 4) with 5–10 ng of antigen per test, it provides a platform that will result in cost savings and the processing of large numbers of samples per day.
Figure 4.

Steps and time required for detection of antibodies to the mSpike or mRBD of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antigens using the Luminex antibody binding assay described herein. Washing steps, delineated in the Materials and Methods, add approximately 30 minutes, resulting in a test requiring approximately 2.5 hours. Abbreviations: Ag, antigen; Ig, immunoglobulin; PE, phycoerythrin.

Steps and time required for detection of antibodies to the mSpike or mRBD of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antigens using the Luminex antibody binding assay described herein. Washing steps, delineated in the Materials and Methods, add approximately 30 minutes, resulting in a test requiring approximately 2.5 hours. Abbreviations: Ag, antigen; Ig, immunoglobulin; PE, phycoerythrin. Ten weeks after this manuscript had been published online as a preprint (https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.14.20059501), Luminex Corporation announced that it had submitted an Emergency Use Authorization for its xMAP SARS-CoV-2 multiantigen immunoglobulin G (IgG) assay. This assay detects human IgG Abs in serum and plasma specific for 3 SARS-CoV-2 antigens (S1 subunit of the spike protein, RBD, and nucleocapsid protein) [13]. The COVID-19 antibody assay described in this publication has the advantage of detecting not only IgG, but also total immunoglobulin, including immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin A (IgA). Several publications suggest that seroconversion to IgA and IgM against SARS-CoV-2 develops earlier compared to IgG [14]. Thus, the multibead assay described here should be able to detect anti–SARS-CoV-2 Abs more reliably earlier after infection than the commercially available SARS-CoV-2 assay from Luminex. Using the SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein is expected to induce higher cross-reactivity to other coronaviruses compared to the spike protein, owing to sequence homology of the viral nucleoprotein, with a sequence homology between SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 for spike, RBD, and nucleocapsid protein being 76%, 50%, and 90%, respectively [15, 16]. With trimeric spike and spike-derived antigens like RBD, a higher level of specificity can be achieved, and the use of both the monomeric RBD and the trimeric spike as antigens enables detection of Abs that can specifically block entry via ACE2, as well as Abs against conformational epitopes on the envelope spike. The Ab assay described here uses antigen-coated fluorochrome-labeled magnetic beads that can be prepared in bulk and used for at least 4 weeks, simplifying the work load and logistics in the laboratory. It is worth noting that, using various human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) proteins and peptides, we have used antigen-coated xMAP beads stored under sterile conditions as described in the Materials and Methods, for 4 or more weeks [17]. Currently, we have used xMAP beads coated with the mSpike or mRBD proteins for 3 weeks; barring degradation of the proteins at –80°C under sterile conditions, it is anticipated that they would be stable and useful for several weeks to months. This means that the antigen-coated beads could be prepared and stored in batches, providing reagents for several thousands of tests. A concentration of 4 μg/106 beads was used for bead coating in the experiments described above, as that concentration had been used previously with various proteins; a concentration of 2 μg protein/106 beads gave comparable values, but <2 μg protein/106 beads gave lower MFI values in titration curves with sera from infected individuals (data not shown). Given that the S and RBD recombinant proteins are currently in limited supply, the use of the lower level of protein for coating is advantageous; coating at 4 and 2 μg/million beads results in the use of a 10 or 5 ng antigen/test, respectively—a level considerably less than that required for most ELISA assays. Further modifications are underway to detect separately immunoglobulin isotypes, to decrease the time and concentration of antigen required, and to determine if other bodily fluids, such as urine and/or saliva, can be used in this assay. Both urine and saliva Ab tests are used for diagnostics in other diseases such as HIV [18, 19]. This assay can be scaled up for use in hospital and reference laboratories. A high-throughput assay such as this can be used for a multitude of purposes including as a diagnostic assay in hospitals and reference laboratories, serosurveillance of communities, screening of healthcare workers who may have developed immunity to SARS-CoV-2, identification of donors for COVID-19 convalescent plasma therapy, and selection of individuals who are potentially immune to reinfection. High-throughput serologic tests like the one described here will also be helpful in surveying infection-fatality rates (vs case fatality rates). These have to be model-based in the absence of broad serological data, and a test such as that described herein could be useful in this important public health role.
  17 in total

1.  Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19.

Authors:  Quan-Xin Long; Bai-Zhong Liu; Hai-Jun Deng; Gui-Cheng Wu; Kun Deng; Yao-Kai Chen; Pu Liao; Jing-Fu Qiu; Yong Lin; Xue-Fei Cai; De-Qiang Wang; Yuan Hu; Ji-Hua Ren; Ni Tang; Yin-Yin Xu; Li-Hua Yu; Zhan Mo; Fang Gong; Xiao-Li Zhang; Wen-Guang Tian; Li Hu; Xian-Xiang Zhang; Jiang-Lin Xiang; Hong-Xin Du; Hua-Wen Liu; Chun-Hui Lang; Xiao-He Luo; Shao-Bo Wu; Xiao-Ping Cui; Zheng Zhou; Man-Man Zhu; Jing Wang; Cheng-Jun Xue; Xiao-Feng Li; Li Wang; Zhi-Jie Li; Kun Wang; Chang-Chun Niu; Qing-Jun Yang; Xiao-Jun Tang; Yong Zhang; Xia-Mao Liu; Jin-Jing Li; De-Chun Zhang; Fan Zhang; Ping Liu; Jun Yuan; Qin Li; Jie-Li Hu; Juan Chen; Ai-Long Huang
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Multimeric Epitope-Scaffold HIV Vaccines Target V1V2 and Differentially Tune Polyfunctional Antibody Responses.

Authors:  Ann J Hessell; Rebecca Powell; Xunqing Jiang; Christina Luo; Svenja Weiss; Vincent Dussupt; Vincenza Itri; Alisa Fox; Mariya B Shapiro; Shilpi Pandey; Tracy Cheever; Deborah H Fuller; Byung Park; Shelly J Krebs; Maxim Totrov; Nancy L Haigwood; Xiang-Peng Kong; Susan Zolla-Pazner
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 9.423

3.  Human neutralizing antibodies elicited by SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  Bin Ju; Qi Zhang; Jiwan Ge; Ruoke Wang; Jing Sun; Xiangyang Ge; Jiazhen Yu; Sisi Shan; Bing Zhou; Shuo Song; Xian Tang; Jinfang Yu; Jun Lan; Jing Yuan; Haiyan Wang; Juanjuan Zhao; Shuye Zhang; Youchun Wang; Xuanling Shi; Lei Liu; Jincun Zhao; Xinquan Wang; Zheng Zhang; Linqi Zhang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans.

Authors:  Fatima Amanat; Daniel Stadlbauer; Shirin Strohmeier; Thi H O Nguyen; Veronika Chromikova; Meagan McMahon; Kaijun Jiang; Guha Asthagiri Arunkumar; Denise Jurczyszak; Jose Polanco; Maria Bermudez-Gonzalez; Giulio Kleiner; Teresa Aydillo; Lisa Miorin; Daniel S Fierer; Luz Amarilis Lugo; Erna Milunka Kojic; Jonathan Stoever; Sean T H Liu; Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles; Philip L Felgner; Thomas Moran; Adolfo García-Sastre; Daniel Caplivski; Allen C Cheng; Katherine Kedzierska; Olli Vapalahti; Jussi M Hepojoki; Viviana Simon; Florian Krammer
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 53.440

5.  Neutralizing epitopes of the SARS-CoV S-protein cluster independent of repertoire, antigen structure or mAb technology.

Authors:  Jody D Berry; Kevin Hay; James M Rini; Meng Yu; Linfa Wang; Francis A Plummer; Cindi R Corbett; Anton Andonov
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 5.857

6.  Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.

Authors:  Victor M Corman; Olfert Landt; Marco Kaiser; Richard Molenkamp; Adam Meijer; Daniel Kw Chu; Tobias Bleicker; Sebastian Brünink; Julia Schneider; Marie Luisa Schmidt; Daphne Gjc Mulders; Bart L Haagmans; Bas van der Veer; Sharon van den Brink; Lisa Wijsman; Gabriel Goderski; Jean-Louis Romette; Joanna Ellis; Maria Zambon; Malik Peiris; Herman Goossens; Chantal Reusken; Marion Pg Koopmans; Christian Drosten
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2020-01

7.  Serum IgA, IgM, and IgG responses in COVID-19.

Authors:  Huan Ma; Weihong Zeng; Hongliang He; Dan Zhao; Dehua Jiang; Peigen Zhou; Linzhao Cheng; Yajuan Li; Xiaoling Ma; Tengchuan Jin
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 11.530

8.  Asymptomatic and Presymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Residents of a Long-Term Care Skilled Nursing Facility - King County, Washington, March 2020.

Authors:  Anne Kimball; Kelly M Hatfield; Melissa Arons; Allison James; Joanne Taylor; Kevin Spicer; Ana C Bardossy; Lisa P Oakley; Sukarma Tanwar; Zeshan Chisty; Jeneita M Bell; Mark Methner; Josh Harney; Jesica R Jacobs; Christina M Carlson; Heather P McLaughlin; Nimalie Stone; Shauna Clark; Claire Brostrom-Smith; Libby C Page; Meagan Kay; James Lewis; Denny Russell; Brian Hiatt; Jessica Gant; Jeffrey S Duchin; Thomas A Clark; Margaret A Honein; Sujan C Reddy; John A Jernigan
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  Antibody Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Authors:  Juanjuan Zhao; Quan Yuan; Haiyan Wang; Wei Liu; Xuejiao Liao; Yingying Su; Xin Wang; Jing Yuan; Tingdong Li; Jinxiu Li; Shen Qian; Congming Hong; Fuxiang Wang; Yingxia Liu; Zhaoqin Wang; Qing He; Zhiyong Li; Bin He; Tianying Zhang; Yang Fu; Shengxiang Ge; Lei Liu; Jun Zhang; Ningshao Xia; Zheng Zhang
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Clinical and epidemiological features of 36 children with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Zhejiang, China: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Haiyan Qiu; Junhua Wu; Liang Hong; Yunling Luo; Qifa Song; Dong Chen
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 71.421

View more
  9 in total

1.  Antibody tests for identification of current and past infection with SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Jonathan J Deeks; Jacqueline Dinnes; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; René Spijker; Sian Taylor-Phillips; Ada Adriano; Sophie Beese; Janine Dretzke; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Isobel M Harris; Malcolm J Price; Sabine Dittrich; Devy Emperador; Lotty Hooft; Mariska Mg Leeflang; Ann Van den Bruel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-25

2.  A flexible, pan-species, multi-antigen platform for the detection and monitoring of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses.

Authors:  Huifeng Shen; David Forgacs; Digantkumar Chapla; Kelley W Moremen; Lance Wells; Sarah A Hamer; Stephen M Tompkins; Ted M Ross; Nadine Rouphael; Srilatha Edupuganti; Matthew H Collins; Rick L Tarleton
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2021-01-27

3.  Detection of Antibody Responses Against SARS-CoV-2 in Plasma and Saliva From Vaccinated and Infected Individuals.

Authors:  Jéromine Klingler; Gregory S Lambert; Vincenza Itri; Sean Liu; Juan C Bandres; Gospel Enyindah-Asonye; Xiaomei Liu; Viviana Simon; Charles R Gleason; Giulio Kleiner; Hsin-Ping Chiu; Chuan-Tien Hung; Shreyas Kowdle; Fatima Amanat; Benhur Lee; Susan Zolla-Pazner; Chitra Upadhyay; Catarina E Hioe
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Non-neutralizing antibodies targeting the immunogenic regions of HIV-1 envelope reduce mucosal infection and virus burden in humanized mice.

Authors:  Catarina E Hioe; Guangming Li; Xiaomei Liu; Ourania Tsahouridis; Xiuting He; Masaya Funaki; Jéromine Klingler; Alex F Tang; Roya Feyznezhad; Daniel W Heindel; Xiao-Hong Wang; David A Spencer; Guangnan Hu; Namita Satija; Jérémie Prévost; Andrés Finzi; Ann J Hessell; Shixia Wang; Shan Lu; Benjamin K Chen; Susan Zolla-Pazner; Chitra Upadhyay; Raymond Alvarez; Lishan Su
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 6.823

5.  Antibody Mediated Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and Human Coronaviruses: Multiplex Beads Assay and Volumetric Absorptive Microsampling to Generate Immune Repertoire Cartography.

Authors:  Jiong Wang; Dongmei Li; Qian Zhou; Alexander Wiltse; Martin S Zand
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Rhesus Macaques Treated Early with Human COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma.

Authors:  Jesse D Deere; Timothy D Carroll; Joseph Dutra; Linda Fritts; Rebecca Lee Sammak; JoAnn L Yee; Katherine J Olstad; J Rachel Reader; Amy Kistler; Jack Kamm; Clara Di Germanio; Yashavanth Shaan Lakshmanappa; Sonny R Elizaldi; Jamin W Roh; Graham Simmons; Jennifer Watanabe; Rachel E Pollard; Jodie Usachenko; Ramya Immareddy; Brian A Schmidt; Shelby L O'Connor; Joseph DeRisi; Michael P Busch; Smita S Iyer; Koen K A Van Rompay; Dennis J Hartigan-O'Connor; Christopher J Miller
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-11-24

7.  SARS-CoV-2 surveillance for a non-human primate breeding research facility.

Authors:  JoAnn L Yee; Koen K A Van Rompay; Amanda B Carpenter; Peter B Nham; Bryson M Halley; Smita S Iyer; Dennis J Hartigan-O'Connor; Christopher J Miller; Jeffrey A Roberts
Journal:  J Med Primatol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 0.821

8.  Production of high-quality SARS-CoV-2 antigens: Impact of bioprocess and storage on glycosylation, biophysical attributes, and ELISA serologic tests performance.

Authors:  Rute Castro; Lígia S Nobre; Rute P Eleutério; Mónica Thomaz; António Pires; Sandra M Monteiro; Sónia Mendes; Ricardo A Gomes; João J Clemente; Marcos F Q Sousa; Filipe Pinto; Ana C Silva; Micael C Freitas; Ana R Lemos; Onome Akpogheneta; Lindsay Kosack; Marie-Louise Bergman; Nadia Duarte; Paula Matoso; Júlia Costa; Tiago M Bandeiras; Patricia Gomes-Alves; Carlos P Gonçalves; Jocelyne Demengeot; Paula M Alves
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 4.395

9.  Role of Immunoglobulin M and A Antibodies in the Neutralization of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.

Authors:  Jéromine Klingler; Svenja Weiss; Vincenza Itri; Xiaomei Liu; Kasopefoluwa Y Oguntuyo; Christian Stevens; Satoshi Ikegame; Chuan-Tien Hung; Gospel Enyindah-Asonye; Fatima Amanat; Ian Baine; Suzanne Arinsburg; Juan C Bandres; Erna Milunka Kojic; Jonathan Stoever; Denise Jurczyszak; Maria Bermudez-Gonzalez; Arthur Nádas; Sean Liu; Benhur Lee; Susan Zolla-Pazner; Catarina E Hioe
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.226

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.