Literature DB >> 32860437

Effect of delayed obstetric labor care during the COVID-19 pandemic on perinatal outcomes.

Sue Yazaki Sun1, Cristina Aparecida Falbo Guazzelli1, Luiza Russo de Morais1, Fernanda Parciapese Dittmer1, Marina Nóbrega Augusto1, Arimaza Contarini Soares1, Priscilla Mota Coutinho da Silva1, Erika de Sá Vieira Abuchaim2, Rosiane Mattar1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Delays; Obstetric delivery; SARS-CoV-2

Year:  2020        PMID: 32860437      PMCID: PMC9347867          DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   4.447


× No keyword cloud information.
Since the beginning of the COVID‐19 quarantine in São Paulo, Brazil, our institution has noticed that some pregnant women, particularly those that were recommended elective cesarean sections for reasons such as repeated cesarean deliveries or abnormal fetal presentation, were admitted to São Paulo Hospital in the second stage of labor and then went on to have vaginal deliveries (Table 1). Therefore, we conducted a comparative cohort study between March 11 and June 11, 2019 and March 11 and June 11, 2020 in order to evaluate whether the quarantine period led to pregnant women with spontaneous labor arriving at our hospital in a more advanced phase of labor. The Institutional Review Board of UNIFESP provided ethical approval for this study (No. 33734620.7.0000.5505).
Table 1

Characteristics of pregnant women admitted at Sao Paulo Hospital (SPH) in spontaneous labor from 11 March, 2019–11 June, 2019, and from 11 March, 2020–11 June, 2020

Year, n0‐3 h b >3h b
2019, 11 (26.8)2020, 16 (40)2019, 30 (73)2020, 24 (60)
Maternal age
<2001 (6.2)3 (10)0
20 ‐ 348 (72.7)10 (62.5)21 (70)19 (79.1)
≥353 (27.2)5 (31.2)6 (20)5 (20.8)
Mean (years)32.4531.7528.3728.63
Robson
1 and 37 (63.6)9 (56.2)24 (80)15 (62.5)
53 (27.2)3 (18.7)3 (10)6 (25)
6 to 101 (9)4 (25)3 (10)3 (12.5)
Gestational age
<372 (18.1)3 (18.7)4 (13.3)21 (87.5)
≥379 (81.8)13 (81.2)26 (86.6)3 (12.5)
Parity
Nulliparous1 (9)2 (12.5)12 (40)11 (45.8)
14 (36.4)7 (43.7)8 (26.6)10 (41.6)
≥26 (54.5)7 (43.7)10 (33.3)3 (12.5)
Delivery type
Vaginal10 (90.9)15 (93,7)21 (70)18 (75)
Forceps0001 (4.1)
Cesarean section1 (9)1 (6.3)9 (30)5 (20.8)
Newborn’s weight (g)
< 25002 (18.1)2 (12.5)1 (3.3)0
2500‐<40008 (72.7)14 (87.5)28 (93.3)24 (100)
≥40001 (9)01 (3.3)0
Perineal laceration
No3 (30)7 (43)9 (30)3 (12.5)
4 (40)6 (37.5)4 (13)9 (37.5)
2 (20)2 (12.5)7 (23)7 (29)
1 (10)01 (3)0
Prenatal care
None2 (18.1)1 (6.2)5 (16.6)0
Elsewhere3 (27.3)3 (18.7)1 (3.3)1 (4.1)
SPH6 (54.5)12 (75)24 (80)23 (95.8)
Apgar score
<72 (18.1)1 (6.25)01 (4.1)
≥79 (81.8)15 (93.7)30 (100)23 (95.8)

Abbreviation: SPH, São Paulo Hospital.

Values shown as number (percentage.).

Time between the arrival at the hospital and the delivery.

Characteristics of pregnant women admitted at Sao Paulo Hospital (SPH) in spontaneous labor from 11 March, 2019–11 June, 2019, and from 11 March, 2020–11 June, 2020 Abbreviation: SPH, São Paulo Hospital. Values shown as number (percentage.). Time between the arrival at the hospital and the delivery. In 2019 there were 143 deliveries during the period of study, 41 of which were initiated by spontaneous labor. By contrast, during the same period in 2020, there were 122 deliveries and 40 patients arrived at the hospital in labor. Delivery within 3 hours of hospital admission occurred in 26.8% (11/41) and 40% (16/40) of cases in 2019 and 2020, respectively. Gestational age was over 37 weeks in 81% of patients in both years. Paradoxically, in 2020 there were more nulliparous women (9% versus 12.5%), fewer women with two or more previous births (54.5% vs 43.7%), and a lower percentage of newborns weighing less than 2500 g (18.1% vs 12.5%). Most of the patients had received prenatal care at the institution (54.5% vs 75%). One potential explanation for the increase in deliveries within 3 hours in 2020 might be related to the reduction of public transport during the pandemic, given that most of the patients reside far from the hospital (median 14 km). Moreover, patients are reluctant to attend treatment at hospitals due to fear of exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2. This phenomenon appears to occur worldwide—it has been reported that delayed care in 12 children in Italy resulted in four deaths and delayed care among patients with ST‐segment‐elevation myocardial infarction. , , Regarding pregnancy, it has been reported that one third of pregnant women started working from home due to fear of being infected. Based on this, our preliminary perception is that our population also feared COVID‐19 infection. As a result, these patients underwent initial labor at home until their concerns about exposure were outweighed by their concerns regarding the wellbeing of their babies. Although our results are limited due to the small sample size, the fact that pregnant women arrived at the hospital in advanced stages of labor with no adverse maternal and neonatal outcome leads us to think that patients should be encouraged to go to the hospital at the active stage of labor under a shared decision model.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

SYS, CAFG, RM, and ESVA equally contributed to the conception and design of the study, and analysis and interpretation of data. LRM, FPD, MNA, PMCS, and ACS contributed to the collection and analysis of data. ACM and PMCS reviewed the literature. SYS, ACS, and LRM wrote the first draft of the paper. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest.
  4 in total

1.  Delayed access or provision of care in Italy resulting from fear of COVID-19.

Authors:  Marzia Lazzerini; Egidio Barbi; Andrea Apicella; Federico Marchetti; Fabio Cardinale; Gianluca Trobia
Journal:  Lancet Child Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-04-09

2.  Health anxiety and behavioural changes of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Gillian A Corbett; Sarah J Milne; Mark P Hehir; Stephen W Lindow; Michael P O'connell
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak on ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Care in Hong Kong, China.

Authors:  Chor-Cheung Frankie Tam; Kent-Shek Cheung; Simon Lam; Anthony Wong; Arthur Yung; Michael Sze; Yui-Ming Lam; Carmen Chan; Tat-Chi Tsang; Matthew Tsui; Hung-Fat Tse; Chung-Wah Siu
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-03-17

4.  [ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in times of COVID-19: back to the last century? A call for attention].

Authors:  Alejandro Gadella; Miguel Ángel Sastre; Carolina Maicas; Luis Rodríguez-Padial; Miguel Á Arias
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 4.753

  4 in total
  9 in total

Review 1.  The impact of mitigation measures on perinatal outcomes during the first nine months of the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Hawco; Daniel L Rolnik; Andrea Woolner; Natalie J Cameron; Victoria Wyness; Ben W Mol; Mairead Black
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 2.831

2.  COVID-19 pandemic and population-level pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a living systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Rohan D'Souza; Ashraf Kharrat; Deshayne B Fell; John W Snelgrove; Kellie E Murphy; Prakesh S Shah
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 4.544

3.  Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Barbara Chmielewska; Imogen Barratt; Rosemary Townsend; Erkan Kalafat; Jan van der Meulen; Ipek Gurol-Urganci; Pat O'Brien; Edward Morris; Tim Draycott; Shakila Thangaratinam; Kirsty Le Doare; Shamez Ladhani; Peter von Dadelszen; Laura Magee; Asma Khalil
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 26.763

Review 4.  The effects of COVID-19 on pregnancy and implications for reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Naima T Joseph; Sonja A Rasmussen; Denise J Jamieson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 7.490

5.  Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in general population: A living systematic review and meta-analysis (updated Aug 14, 2021).

Authors:  Jie Yang; Rohan D'Souza; Ashraf Kharrat; Deshayne B Fell; John W Snelgrove; Kellie E Murphy; Prakesh S Shah
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 4.544

6.  Cesarean section rate and outcomes during and before the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  George Uchenna Eleje; Emmanuel Onyebuchi Ugwu; Joseph Tochukwu Enebe; Chukwuemeka Chukwubuikem Okoro; Boniface Chukwuneme Okpala; Nnanyelugo Chima Ezeora; Emeka Ifeanyi Iloghalu; Chidebe Christian Anikwe; Chigozie Geoffrey Okafor; Polycarp Uchenna Agu; Emeka Philip Igbodike; Iffiyeosuo Dennis Ake; Kingsley Emeka Ekwuazi; Arinze Anthony Onwuegbuna; Osita Samuel Umeononihu; Onyedika Promise Anaedu; David Chibuike Ikwuka; Henry Ifeanyi Nwaolisa; Chukwuemeka Chidindu Njoku; Chidinma Patricia Nwankwo; Ekene Agatha Emeka; Lydia Ijeoma Eleje; Kenechi Miracle Adinnu; Chinelo Onuegbuna Okoye; Angela Ogechukwu Ugwu; Ethel Oluchukwu Nwachukwu; Sunday Gabriel Mba; Eziamaka Pauline Ezenkwele; Uchenna Elizabeth Okoye; Chika Ifeoma Ofiaeli; Golibe Christian Ikpeze; Livinus Nnanyere Onah; Odigonma Zinobia Ikpeze; Toochukwu Benjamin Ejikeme; Gerald Okanandu Udigwe; Joseph Ifeanyichukwu Ikechebelu
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-03-23

7.  Impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on risk of prematurity, birthweight and obstetric complications: A multivariate analysis from a nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emmanuel Simon; Jean-Bernard Gouyon; Jonathan Cottenet; Sonia Bechraoui-Quantin; Patrick Rozenberg; Anne-Sophie Mariet; Catherine Quantin
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 7.331

8.  Implementing quality improvement intervention to improve intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring during COVID-19 pandemic- observational study.

Authors:  Pratiksha Bhattarai; Rejina Gurung; Omkar Basnet; Honey Malla; Mats Målqvist; Ashish K C
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Global changes in maternity care provision during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rosemary Townsend; Barbara Chmielewska; Imogen Barratt; Erkan Kalafat; Jan van der Meulen; Ipek Gurol-Urganci; Pat O'Brien; Edward Morris; Tim Draycott; Shakila Thangaratinam; Kirsty Le Doare; Shamez Ladhani; Peter von Dadelszen; Laura A Magee; Asma Khalil
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-06-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.