Eoin McElroy1, Praveetha Patalay2, Bettina Moltrecht3, Mark Shevlin4, Adrienne Shum5, Cathy Creswell5, Polly Waite5. 1. Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, University of Leicester, UK. 2. Centre for Longitudinal Studies and Medical Research Council Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, UK. 3. Evidence Based Practice Unit, University College London and Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK. 4. School of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, UK. 5. Departments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The mental health consequences of COVID-19 are predicted to have a disproportionate impact on certain groups. We aimed to develop a brief measure, the Pandemic Anxiety Scale, to capture the specific aspects of the pandemic that are provoking anxiety, and explore how these vary by health and demographic factors. DESIGN: Data were from a convenience sample of parents (N = 4,793) and adolescents (N = 698) recruited in the first 6 weeks of lockdown. METHODS: Factor analytic and IRT methods were used to validate the new measure in both parent and adolescent samples. Associations between scores on the new measure and age, gender, household income, and physical health status were explored using structural equation modelling (SEM). RESULTS: Two factors were identified in both samples: disease anxiety (e.g., catching, transmitting the virus) and consequence anxiety (e.g., impact on economic prospects); and unique associations with health and demographic factors were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Anxieties due to the COVID-19 are multifaceted, and the PAS is a short, reliable, and valid measure of these concerns. These anxieties are differentially associated with demographic, social, and health factors, which should be considered when developing strategies to mitigate the mental health impact of the pandemic.
OBJECTIVES: The mental health consequences of COVID-19 are predicted to have a disproportionate impact on certain groups. We aimed to develop a brief measure, the Pandemic Anxiety Scale, to capture the specific aspects of the pandemic that are provoking anxiety, and explore how these vary by health and demographic factors. DESIGN: Data were from a convenience sample of parents (N = 4,793) and adolescents (N = 698) recruited in the first 6 weeks of lockdown. METHODS: Factor analytic and IRT methods were used to validate the new measure in both parent and adolescent samples. Associations between scores on the new measure and age, gender, household income, and physical health status were explored using structural equation modelling (SEM). RESULTS: Two factors were identified in both samples: disease anxiety (e.g., catching, transmitting the virus) and consequence anxiety (e.g., impact on economic prospects); and unique associations with health and demographic factors were observed. CONCLUSIONS:Anxieties due to the COVID-19 are multifaceted, and the PAS is a short, reliable, and valid measure of these concerns. These anxieties are differentially associated with demographic, social, and health factors, which should be considered when developing strategies to mitigate the mental health impact of the pandemic.
Authors: Lucy S King; Daisy E Feddoes; Jaclyn S Kirshenbaum; Kathryn L Humphreys; Ian H Gotlib Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Molly E Waring; Sherry L Pagoto; Lauren R Rudin; Chloe Ho; Alexa Horkachuck; Indra A Kapoor; Quamyia Foye Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2022-01-04
Authors: Jennifer A Appleby; Nathan King; Kate E Saunders; Anne Bast; Daniel Rivera; Jin Byun; Simone Cunningham; Charandeep Khera; Anne C Duffy Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-01-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Stephen X Zhang; Hao Huang; Jizhen Li; Mayra Antonelli-Ponti; Scheila Farias de Paiva; José Aparecido da Silva Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-30 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: C Hatton; T Bailey; J Bradshaw; S Caton; S Flynn; A Gillooly; A Jahoda; R Maguire; A Marriott; P Mulhall; E Oloidi; L Taggart; S Todd; D Abbott; S Beyer; N Gore; P Heslop; K Scior; R P Hastings Journal: J Intellect Disabil Res Date: 2021-09-16