Literature DB >> 32860125

Sucralose can improve glucose tolerance and upregulate expression of sweet taste receptors and glucose transporters in an obese rat model.

Cheng Qian1, Yicheng Qi1, Rilu Feng1, Mei Yang1, Minchun Zhang1, Wei Liu1, Christopher K Rayner2,3, Jing Ma4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) are widely used as replacements for table sugar in beverages and dessert. However, the metabolic effects of NNS remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the effects of various sucralose loads on glucose metabolism and expression of sweet taste receptors (STR) and glucose transporters in a high-fat diet (HFD) rats.
METHODS: Four-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats were fed a HFD for 8 weeks, then randomly divided into eight groups (6 in each group). All were gavaged with either saline, sucralose (0.54 mM or 0.78 mM), or sucrose (324 mM) with/without gurmarin, a sweet taste inhibitor, for 4 weeks, followed by an intragastric glucose tolerance test (IGGTT) with blood glucose, and plasma insulin, GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) measurements. In the following week, the rats were sacrificed and the small intestine was removed for measurement of sweet taste receptor and glucose transporter expression by quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction.
RESULTS: In HFD rats, blood glucose levels were decreased at 30, 60, and 120 min during the IGGTT after 4 weeks supplementation with 0.78 mM sucralose. TIR3 expression was increased in the duodenum and TIR2 was increased in the ileum after 324 mM sucrose supplementation. T1R3 expression was increased after 0.54 mM and 0.78 mM sucralose in the ileum, but there was no change in the expression of TIRs in the duodenum after sucralose treatments. SGLT-1 expression was increased after both 0.78 mM sucralose and 324 mM sucrose in the ileum, and only increased in the duodenum after 324 mM sucrose supplementation.
CONCLUSIONS: The effects of sucralose on glucose metabolism in HFD rats are dose-dependent and related to enhanced expression of sweet taste receptors and glucose transporters. Further studies are needed to clarify the molecular mechanisms involved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GLP-1; Intragastric glucose tolerance test; Non-nutritive sweeteners; SGLT-1; Sweet taste receptors

Year:  2020        PMID: 32860125     DOI: 10.1007/s00394-020-02375-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nutr        ISSN: 1436-6207            Impact factor:   5.614


  26 in total

Review 1.  Sugar-sweetened and artificially-sweetened beverages in relation to obesity risk.

Authors:  Mark A Pereira
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 2.  Nonnutritive sweeteners and cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Meghan B Azad; Ahmed M Abou-Setta; Bhupendrasinh F Chauhan; Rasheda Rabbani; Justin Lys; Leslie Copstein; Amrinder Mann; Maya M Jeyaraman; Ashleigh E Reid; Michelle Fiander; Dylan S MacKay; Jon McGavock; Brandy Wicklow; Ryan Zarychanski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Sweet-taste-suppressing compounds: current knowledge and perspectives of application.

Authors:  Maud Sigoillot; Anne Brockhoff; Wolfgang Meyerhof; Loïc Briand
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Lactisole interacts with the transmembrane domains of human T1R3 to inhibit sweet taste.

Authors:  Peihua Jiang; Meng Cui; Baohua Zhao; Zhan Liu; Lenore A Snyder; Lumie M J Benard; Roman Osman; Robert F Margolskee; Marianna Max
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-01-24       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota.

Authors:  Jotham Suez; Tal Korem; David Zeevi; Gili Zilberman-Schapira; Christoph A Thaiss; Ori Maza; David Israeli; Niv Zmora; Shlomit Gilad; Adina Weinberger; Yael Kuperman; Alon Harmelin; Ilana Kolodkin-Gal; Hagit Shapiro; Zamir Halpern; Eran Segal; Eran Elinav
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  Sweet-taste receptors, low-energy sweeteners, glucose absorption and insulin release.

Authors:  Andrew G Renwick; Samuel V Molinary
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.718

7.  Artificial sweeteners produce the counterintuitive effect of inducing metabolic derangements.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 12.015

Review 8.  Non-nutritive sweeteners and obesity.

Authors:  John D Fernstrom
Journal:  Annu Rev Food Sci Technol       Date:  2014-12-22

9.  Different functional roles of T1R subunits in the heteromeric taste receptors.

Authors:  Hong Xu; Lena Staszewski; Huixian Tang; Elliot Adler; Mark Zoller; Xiaodong Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Artificial sweeteners - a review.

Authors:  Sanchari Chattopadhyay; Utpal Raychaudhuri; Runu Chakraborty
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.701

View more
  2 in total

1.  Low Doses of Sucralose Alter Fecal Microbiota in High-Fat Diet-Induced Obese Rats.

Authors:  Minchun Zhang; Jie Chen; Minglan Yang; Cheng Qian; Yu Liu; Yicheng Qi; Rilu Feng; Mei Yang; Wei Liu; Jing Ma
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-12-28

2.  Sucralose consumption ameliorates high-fat diet-induced glucose intolerance and liver weight gain in mice.

Authors:  Pamela Pino-Seguel; Omara Moya; Juan Carlos Borquez; Francisco Pino-de la Fuente; Francisco Díaz-Castro; Camila Donoso-Barraza; Miguel Llanos; Rodrigo Troncoso; Roberto Bravo-Sagua
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-09-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.