Literature DB >> 32860102

Mobility and mortality of 340 patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis.

Masahiro Yoshida1, Kosuke Tajima2, Yuki Saito2,3, Koji Sato2,3, Norimichi Uenishi2, Mitsunaga Iwata2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate prognosis of patients with fragility fracture of the pelvis (FFP) treated in a single trauma unit in Japan.
METHODS: We retrospectively investigated 340 consecutive patients with FFP (40 men, 300 women; average age, 82.5 years) treated in our facility from April 2012 to April 2019. Fractures were categorized according to the Rommens classification. Patients' mechanism of injury, existence of hip implant, standing and walking abilities (using the Majeed score), and 1-year mortality rate were evaluated.
RESULTS: According to the Rommens classification, there were 84 type Ia, 2 type Ib, 24 type IIa, 78 type IIb, 51 type IIc, 40 type IIIa, 1 type IIIb, 4 type IIIc, 1 type IVa, 51 type IVb, and 3 type IVc fractures. Sixteen patients (4.7%) received surgical treatments. Twenty-eight patients (8.2%) had no memory of a traumatic event, and 61 (18%) had implants from a previous hip surgery. A total of 176 patients (52%) were followed up for ≥ 1 year, and 70 (39.8%) and 67 (38.1%) patients had recovery of standing and walking abilities, similar to those before the injury. The operative group (7/9 = 77.8%) had a higher proportion of patients who regained their standing and walking abilities at the 1-year follow-up than the conservative group. The 1-year mortality rate of the patients who could be followed for ≥ 1 year was 6.7%.
CONCLUSION: According to our data, 4.7% of patients were indicated for surgery, and only < 40% of patients were able to regain their pre-injury standing and walking abilities at 1 year after the injury. FFP may greatly affect an elderly's activities of daily living and may lead to prognosis similar to patients with proximal hip fractures. To regain the walking ability of patients with FFP, more aggressive indication of surgical treatment may be considered depending on the patient's background. Further examinations are necessary to determine the surgical indications and treatment protocol for FFP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fragility fracture; Hip fracture; Pelvis; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32860102     DOI: 10.1007/s00068-020-01481-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg        ISSN: 1863-9933            Impact factor:   3.693


  1 in total

1.  Surgical intervention for blunt bowel and mesenteric injury: indications and time intervals.

Authors:  Yuko Okishio; Kentaro Ueda; Toru Nasu; Shuji Kawashima; Kosei Kunitatsu; Seiya Kato
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 3.693

  1 in total
  13 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of pelvic radiographs for the detection of traumatic pelvic fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Yuntong Ma; Jacob C Mandell; Tatiana Rocha; Maria ADuran Mendicuti; Michael J Weaver; Bharti Khurana
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2022-10-03

2.  The morphology of the sacral corridor for transiliac transsacral screw in Japanese osteoporotic vertebral fracture patients: Analysis using CT data.

Authors:  Yohei Yanagisawa; Takahiro Sunami; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-01

3.  Perioperative outcome of minimally invasive stabilisation of bilateral fragility fractures of the sacrum: a comparative study of bisegmental transsacral stabilisation versus spinopelvic fixation.

Authors:  Thomas Mendel; Bernhard W Ullrich; Philipp Schenk; Gunther Olaf Hofmann; Felix Goehre; Stefan Schwan; Florian Brakopp; Friederike Klauke
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Internal fixation of radiation-induced fragility fractures of the pelvis: a case series.

Authors:  Mehdi Boudissa; Geoffrey Porcheron; Daniel Wagner; Frank Traub; George Farah; Pol Maria Rommens
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Focus on fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Authors:  Pol Maria Rommens; Alexander Hofmann
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Self-rated health status and activities of daily living in the first 12 months after fragility fractures of the pelvis-a prospective study on 134 patients.

Authors:  Juliana Hack; Benjamin Buecking; Lukas Strauch; Julia Lenz; Tom Knauf; Steffen Ruchholtz; Ludwig Oberkircher
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  A computed tomography based survey study investigating the agreement of the therapeutic strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Authors:  Daniel Wagner; Andreas Höch; Philipp Pieroh; Tim Hohmann; Florian Gras; Sven Märdian; Alexander Pflug; Silvan Wittenberg; Christoph Ihle; Notker Blankenburg; Kevin Dallacker-Losensky; Tanja Schröder; Steven C Herath; Hans-Georg Palm; Christoph Josten; Fabian M Stuby
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Inverse association between sarcopenia and displacement in the early phase of fragility fractures of the pelvis.

Authors:  Shintaro Honda; Satoshi Ota; Shinnosuke Yamashita; Tadashi Yasuda
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2022-03-22

9.  The impact of specific fracture characteristics of low-energy fractures of the pelvis on mortality.

Authors:  Franziska Saxer; Henrik Eckardt; Michaela Ramser; Werner Vach; Nathalie Strub; Dieter Cadosch
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 4.070

10.  Does surgical treatment for unstable fragility fracture of the pelvis promote early mobilization and improve survival rate and postoperative clinical function?

Authors:  Yuki Saito; Katsuhiro Tokutake; Yasuhiko Takegami; Masahiro Yoshida; Toshifumi Omichi; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.374

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.