| Literature DB >> 32859794 |
Hongzhi Wang1, Emily W Baker2, Abhyuday Mandal1, Ramana M Pidaparti3, Franklin D West2, Holly A Kinder2.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) at a young age can lead to the development of long-term functional impairments. Severity of injury is well demonstrated to have a strong influence on the extent of functional impairments; however, identification of specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biomarkers that are most reflective of injury severity and functional prognosis remain elusive. Therefore, the objective of this study was to utilize advanced statistical approaches to identify clinically relevant MRI biomarkers and predict functional outcomes using MRI metrics in a translational large animal piglet TBI model. TBI was induced via controlled cortical impact and multiparametric MRI was performed at 24 hours and 12 weeks post-TBI using T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery, diffusion-weighted imaging, and diffusion tensor imaging. Changes in spatiotemporal gait parameters were also assessed using an automated gait mat at 24 hours and 12 weeks post-TBI. Principal component analysis was performed to determine the MRI metrics and spatiotemporal gait parameters that explain the largest sources of variation within the datasets. We found that linear combinations of lesion size and midline shift acquired using T2-weighted imaging explained most of the variability of the data at both 24 hours and 12 weeks post-TBI. In addition, linear combinations of velocity, cadence, and stride length were found to explain most of the gait data variability at 24 hours and 12 weeks post-TBI. Linear regression analysis was performed to determine if MRI metrics are predictive of changes in gait. We found that both lesion size and midline shift are significantly correlated with decreases in stride and step length. These results from this study provide an important first step at identifying relevant MRI and functional biomarkers that are predictive of functional outcomes in a clinically relevant piglet TBI model. This study was approved by the University of Georgia Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (AUP: A2015 11-001) on December 22, 2015.Entities:
Keywords: controlled cortical impact; gait analysis; linear regression; magnetic resonance imaging; motor function; pediatric pig model; principal component analysis; traumatic brain injury
Year: 2021 PMID: 32859794 PMCID: PMC7896230 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.290915
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Regen Res ISSN: 1673-5374 Impact factor: 5.135
Gait parameter definitions
| Gait parameter | Definition |
|---|---|
| Step length | Distance between corresponding successive points of heel contact of opposing limbs (i.e., right front and left front, right hind and left hind); expressed in cm |
| Stride length | Distance between successive points of heel contact of the same hoof (i.e., left front and left front); expressed in cm |
| Hind reach | Distance from the heel center of the hind limb to the heel center of the previous front limb on the same side (i.e., left hind to left front); expressed in cm |
| Step/stride ratio | The ratio between step and stride lengths of the same limb |
| Number of sensors | The number of sensors activated by contact of each limb |
| Velocity | Stride Length divided by stride time, expressed in cm/s |
| Cadence | Frequency of steps/min during a trial |
| Percent stance | Percentage of time during which a limb is in stance phase during one stride cycle (stance time/cycle time) |
| Percent swing | Percentage of time during which a limb is in swing phase during one stride cycle (swing time/cycle time) |
| Mean pressure | Average pressure of all sensors for one limb |
| Total scaled pressure | The sum of peak pressure values recorded from each activated sensor by a limb during mat contact, represented by the switching levels and reported as a scaled pressure from 0–7 for each sensor |
| Total pressure index (TPI) | Percent distribution of weight across all four limbs. Pigs typically carry 30% of their weight in each front limb and 20% of their weight in each hind limb |
Linear regression demonstrates that lesion volume predicts stride length and step length. Midline shift also predicts stride length and step length
| Model of parameters | |
|---|---|
| Stride length = 96.14 – 8.7 × lesion volume | 0.0306 |
| Step length = 48.68 – 4.52 × lesion volume | 0.0219 |
| Stride length = 68.79 – 4.45 × midline shift | 0.0341 |
| Step length = 34.5 – 2.26 × midline shift | 0.0305 |
P-value of < 0.05 indicates significance.