Literature DB >> 32859598

Processing Has Differential Effects on Microbiota-Accessible Carbohydrates in Whole Grains during In Vitro Fermentation.

Caroline Smith1, Mallory J Van Haute1,2, Devin J Rose3,2,4.   

Abstract

Whole grains are generally low in nondigestible carbohydrates that are available for fermentation by the gut microbiota, or microbiota-accessible carbohydrates (MAC). However, there is potential to increase MAC in whole grains through food processing. Five processing methods: boiling, extrusion, sourdough bread, unleavened bread, and yeast bread, were applied to whole wheat flour and then subjected to in vitro digestion followed by fermentation using fecal microbiomes from 10 subjects. The microbiomes separated into 2 groups: those that showed high carbohydrate utilization (CU) and those that exhibited low CU. The former exhibited not only enhanced CU but also increased butyrate production (MAC, 31.1 ± 1.1% versus 19.3 ± 1.2%, P < 0.001; butyrate, 5.26 ± 0.26 mM versus 3.17 ± 0.27 mM, P < 0.001). Only the microbiomes in the high-CU group showed significant differences among processing methods: extrusion and sourdough bread led to dichotomous results for MAC and short-chain fatty acid production, where extrusion resulted in high MAC but low butyrate production while sourdough bread resulted in low MAC but high butyrate production. Extrusion led to a noticeable decrease in α-diversity and some members of the families Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae, with increases in Acinetobacter, Enterococcus, and Staphylococcaceae This study demonstrated that only microbiomes that exhibited high CU responded to the effects of processing by showing significant differences among processing methods. In these microbiomes, extrusion was able to increase accessibility of the cell wall polysaccharides but did not increase butyrate production. In contrast, sourdough bread led to high butyrate production by supporting important butyrate-producers in the families Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae IMPORTANCE Dietary nondigestible carbohydrates, or dietary fiber, have long been recognized for their beneficial health effects. However, recent studies have revealed that fermentation of nondigestible carbohydrates by gut bacteria is critical in mediating many of the health-promoting properties of dietary fibers. Whole grains are excellent candidates to supply the microbiome with a plentiful source of nondigestible carbohydrates, although unfortunately a majority of these carbohydrates in whole grains are not available to gut bacteria for fermentation. Processing is known to alter the structural characteristics of nondigestible carbohydrates in whole grains, yet the relationship between these effects and gut microbial fermentation is unknown. This research aimed to address this important research gap by identifying interactions between whole-grain processing and gut bacteria, with the ultimate goal of increasing the availability of nondigestible carbohydrates for fermentation to enhance host health.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lachnospiraceaezzm321990; Ruminococcaceaezzm321990; butyrate; dietary fiber; wheat

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32859598      PMCID: PMC7580540          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01705-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  29 in total

1.  Total dietary fiber intakes in the US population are related to whole grain consumption: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009 to 2010.

Authors:  Marla Reicks; Satya Jonnalagadda; Ann M Albertson; Nandan Joshi
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Starving our microbial self: the deleterious consequences of a diet deficient in microbiota-accessible carbohydrates.

Authors:  Erica D Sonnenburg; Justin L Sonnenburg
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 27.287

3.  Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.

Authors:  T Z DeSantis; P Hugenholtz; N Larsen; M Rojas; E L Brodie; K Keller; T Huber; D Dalevi; P Hu; G L Andersen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Fermentation in human subjects of nonstarch polysaccharides in mixed diets, but not in a barley fiber concentrate, could be predicted by in vitro fermentation using human fecal inocula.

Authors:  M Daniel; E Wisker; G Rave; W Feldheim
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 5.  A perspective on the complexity of dietary fiber structures and their potential effect on the gut microbiota.

Authors:  Bruce R Hamaker; Yunus E Tuncil
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Prebiotic effects and intestinal fermentation of cereal arabinoxylans and arabinoxylan oligosaccharides in rats depend strongly on their structural properties and joint presence.

Authors:  Bram Damen; Joran Verspreet; Annick Pollet; Willem F Broekaert; Jan A Delcour; Christophe M Courtin
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 7.  Biological significance of short-chain fatty acid metabolism by the intestinal microbiome.

Authors:  Elena Puertollano; Sofia Kolida; Parveen Yaqoob
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.294

8.  Impact of dietary fiber fermentation from cereal grains on metabolite production by the fecal microbiota from normal weight and obese individuals.

Authors:  Junyi Yang; Ali Keshavarzian; Devin J Rose
Journal:  J Med Food       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.786

Review 9.  Dietary fiber and prebiotics and the gastrointestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Hannah D Holscher
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2017-02-06

10.  Impact of food processing on rye product properties and their in vitro digestion.

Authors:  Daniel P Johansson; José L Vázquez Gutiérrez; Rikard Landberg; Marie Alminger; Maud Langton
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 5.614

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Prebiotics and the Human Gut Microbiota: From Breakdown Mechanisms to the Impact on Metabolic Health.

Authors:  Cassandre Bedu-Ferrari; Paul Biscarrat; Philippe Langella; Claire Cherbuy
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 2.  Histamine Intolerance Originates in the Gut.

Authors:  Wolfgang J Schnedl; Dietmar Enko
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Feeding with Sustainably Sourdough Bread Has the Potential to Promote the Healthy Microbiota Metabolism at the Colon Level.

Authors:  Alessio Da Ros; Andrea Polo; Carlo Giuseppe Rizzello; Marta Acin-Albiac; Marco Montemurro; Raffaella Di Cagno; Marco Gobbetti
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-12-01

4.  In Vitro Digestibility and Bioaccessibility of Nutrients and Non-Nutrients Composing Extruded Brewers' Spent Grain.

Authors:  Maria Belen Gutierrez-Barrutia; Sonia Cozzano; Patricia Arcia; Maria Dolores Del Castillo
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 6.706

5.  Carbohydrate utilization by the gut microbiome determines host health responsiveness to whole grain type and processing methods.

Authors:  Caroline Smith; Mallory J Van Haute; Yibo Xian; Rafael R Segura Munoz; Sujun Liu; Robert J Schmaltz; Amanda E Ramer-Tait; Devin J Rose
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.