Literature DB >> 3285943

A double-blind study comparing the efficiency, tolerance and renal effects of iopromide and iopamidol.

C Kennedy1, D Rickards, S Lee, M B Sharp, P Dawson.   

Abstract

A randomized double-blind, group comparative study was carried out to investigate the diagnostic efficiency and side-effect profiles, with particular reference to renal tolerance, of iopamidol and a newer non-ionic contrast medium iopromide, when used in excretory urography. The trial demonstrated that, in a population of 137 patients undergoing excretory urography and being investigated from baseline up to 2 weeks after the administration of the contrast medium, there were no significant adverse effects on the indicators currently thought to reflect renal function. The efficiency of the two contrast agents proved to be very similar and the radiographic quality of opacification was adequate in nearly every case.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3285943     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-61-724-288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  1 in total

1.  Are there any differences in acute adverse reactions among five low-osmolar non-ionic iodinated contrast media?

Authors:  Tatsuya Gomi; Masashi Nagamoto; Makoto Hasegawa; Asako Katoh; Miki Sugiyama; Nozomu Murata; Toshiyuki Kunihiro; Ehiichi Kohda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.