Literature DB >> 3285938

An evaluation of four end-user systems for searching MEDLINE.

M D Bonham1, L L Nelson.   

Abstract

This study compared features and determined which of four end-user systems (PaperChase, GRATEFUL MED, Med-Base, or Compact Cambridge: MEDLINE) would best serve the Medical Sciences and Optometry Libraries of Indiana University in providing biomedical information to faculty and graduate students through MEDLINE. Cost, ease of use, retrieval, training needs, equipment requirements, and adequacy of documentation were examined. The study consisted of a comparison of the features of each system based on available documentation; a controlled search performed by the investigators on each system and on regular NLM MEDLINE; and a user study based on observations, questionnaires, and interviews with eleven library patrons who performed the same search of their choice on each of the four systems.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3285938      PMCID: PMC227172     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 0025-7338


  6 in total

1.  Observations of end-user online searching behavior over eleven years.

Authors:  W Sewell; S Teitelbaum
Journal:  J Am Soc Inf Sci       Date:  1986-07

2.  End-user searching in medicine.

Authors:  E H Poisson
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1986-10

3.  How to keep up with the medical literature: V. Access by personal computer to the medical literature.

Authors:  R B Haynes; K A McKibbon; D Fitzgerald; G H Guyatt; C J Walker; D L Sackett
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Computer searching of the medical literature. An evaluation of MEDLINE searching systems.

Authors:  R B Haynes; K A McKibbon; C J Walker; J Mousseau; L M Baker; D Fitzgerald; G Guyatt; G R Norman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  PaperChase: a computer program to search the medical literature.

Authors:  G L Horowitz; H L Bleich
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-10-15       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  PaperChase. Self-service bibliographic retrieval.

Authors:  G L Horowitz; J D Jackson; H L Bleich
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-11-11       Impact factor: 56.272

  6 in total
  8 in total

1.  The effect of end-user searching on reference services: experience with MEDLINE and current contents.

Authors:  L Salisbury; H S Toombs; E A Kelly; S Crawford
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1990-04

2.  Integrating CD-ROM Medline with electronic mail: first step in implementing new strategy for online reference library.

Authors:  R Ribitzky
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1991

3.  SPIRS, WinSPIRS, and OVID: a comparison of three MEDLINE-on-CD-ROM interfaces.

Authors:  D Schoonbaert
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1996-01

4.  Augmenting GRATEFUL MED with the UMLS Metathesaurus: an initial evaluation.

Authors:  J S Jachna; S M Powsner; P L Miller
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1993-01

5.  The health sciences librarian as Internet navigator and interpreter.

Authors:  B N Warling; C D Stave
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1995-10

6.  A comparison of CINAHL and MEDLINE CD-ROM in four allied health areas.

Authors:  M M Watson; R Perrin
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1994-04

7.  Promoting new and expanded roles for librarians and information specialists.

Authors:  Carla J Funk
Journal:  Inf Serv Use       Date:  2022-06-10

8.  Comparison of search strategies on CD Plus/MEDLINE.

Authors:  L C Wright; H J Sutherland; J I Jackson; J E Till
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.