Literature DB >> 3285878

Nifedipine in acute myocardial infarction: an assessment of left ventricular function, infarct size, and infarct expansion. A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial.

S O Gottlieb1, L C Becker, J L Weiss, E P Shapiro, N C Chandra, J T Flaherty, S H Gottlieb, P Ouyang, E D Mellits, S N Townsend.   

Abstract

The influence of nifedipine on left ventricular ejection fraction, infarct size, and infarct expansion was studied in a prospective, double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial in 132 patients with low risk acute myocardial infarction of less than 12 hours duration, defined by an initial left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 35% and clinical Killip class of less than or equal to II. Sixty four patients were assigned to nifedipine 120 mg/day and 68 to placebo. Treatment was started on average (SEM) 8.0 (0.2) hours after onset of pain and continued for six weeks. Gated blood pool scans, thallium scans, and cross sectional echocardiograms were performed before treatment and at 10 days. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, cardiac risk factors, or use of other medications. Mean (SEM) global left ventricular ejection fraction was not different before treatment (nifedipine group 53 (2%), placebo group 55 (2%) and did not differ at 10 days (nifedipine group 54 (2%), placebo group 52 (2%). There were also no differences in regional wall motion or regional ejection fractions. Thallium defects quantified by computer analysis were similar in both groups before treatment (nifedipine 7.8 (0.7), placebo 7.9 (0.7)) and at 10 days (nifedipine 5.3 (0.7) placebo 5.3 (0.7)). In the subgroup of patients with transmural infarction who had good quality echocardiograms and serial studies (n = 30), there was no difference in mean (SEM) baseline infarct segment lengths between the two groups (nifedipine 70 (4) mm, placebo 65 (4) mm); however, the nifedipine group demonstrated no significant change in infarct segment length between the initial and 10 day studies ( + 0.6 (3) mm) while there was a significant increase in the infarct segment length in the placebo group (+ 7.8 (4) mm). The infarct segment length increased by >/= 1 cm in seven (47%) placebo patients but in only one (7%) nifedipine patient. The nifedipine group had a significant initial 10% decrease in mean arterial pressure whereas there was no change in the in the placebo group; this blood pressure difference persisted for 10 days. Thus although the early administration of nifedipine has no detectable effect on clinical outcome and infarction size, it may reduce early infarct expansion via an afterload reduction mechanism in patients with transmural infarction. These initial results must be interpreted with caution and need to be confirmed in a larger trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3285878      PMCID: PMC1216485          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.59.4.411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  30 in total

Review 1.  Specific pharmacology of calcium in myocardium, cardiac pacemakers, and vascular smooth muscle.

Authors:  A Fleckenstein
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 13.820

2.  "Circumferential profiles:" a new method for computer analysis of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion images.

Authors:  R D Burow; M Pond; A W Schafer; L Becker
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Protective effect of pretreatment with verapamil, nifedipine and propranolol on mitochondrial function in the ischemic and reperfused myocardium.

Authors:  W G Nayler; R Ferrari; A Williams
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.778

4.  Nifedipine therapy for stable angina pectoris: preliminary results of effects on angina frequency and treadmill exercise response.

Authors:  R M Moskowitz; P A Piccini; G V Nacarelli; R Zelis
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1979-10-22       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 5.  Role of calcium and cyclic adenosine 3':5' monophosphate in regulating smooth muscle contraction. Mechanisms of excitation-contraction coupling in smooth muscle.

Authors:  R S Adelstein; D R Hathaway
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1979-10-22       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Effect of early treatment with nifedipine in suspected acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J P Branagan; K Walsh; P Kelly; W C Collins; D McCafferty; M J Walsh
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 7.  Comparative pharmacology of calcium antagonists: nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazem.

Authors:  P D Henry
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1980-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Regional cardiac dilatation after acute myocardial infarction: recognition by two-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  L W Eaton; J L Weiss; B H Bulkley; J B Garrison; M L Weisfeldt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The effects of nifedipine on acute experimental myocardial ischemia and infarction in dogs.

Authors:  A P Selwyn; E Welman; K Fox; P Horlock; T Pratt; M Klein
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 17.367

10.  Coronary vasospasm as a possible cause of myocardial infarction. A conclusion derived from the study of "preinfarction" angina.

Authors:  A Maseri; A L'Abbate; G Baroldi; S Chierchia; M Marzilli; A M Ballestra; S Severi; O Parodi; A Biagini; A Distante; A Pesola
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-12-07       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Management of acute non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. The role of prophylactic diltiazem therapy and indications for predischarge coronary arteriography.

Authors:  R S Gibson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Hemodynamic effects of nisoldipine, a highly specific calcium antagonist, in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  J Wilson; P J Commerford; R S Millar; L H Opie
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 3.  The role of beta-receptor and calcium-entry-blocking agents in acute myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era: can the results of thrombolytic reperfusion be enhanced?

Authors:  C J Lavie; J G Murphy; B J Gersh
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 4.  Why Is Infarct Expansion Such an Elusive Therapeutic Target?

Authors:  William J Richardson; Jeffrey W Holmes
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Myocardial infarction in rats: effects of metabolic and pharmacologic interventions.

Authors:  H G Zimmer; P A Martius; G Marschner
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 17.165

Review 6.  Protective effects of calcium antagonists against ischaemia and reperfusion damage.

Authors:  R Ferrari; O Visioli
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Myocardial infarction. Secondary prevention with nifedipine.

Authors:  W Rafflenbeul; F Ebner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Calcium channel blockers in acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina: an overview.

Authors:  P H Held; S Yusuf; C D Furberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-11-11

9.  The acute effects of intravenous nisoldipine on left ventricular function 24 to 72 hours after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R C de Nooijer; E E van der Wall; V M Cats; G van Herpen; A van der Laarse; J A Blokland; W Jaarsma; J W Arndt; A V Bruschke
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.727

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.