Nikki N Klarenbeek1, Maya Keuning1,2,3, Jeroen Hol4, Dasja Pajkrt3, Frans B Plötz1,2. 1. From the Department of Pediatrics, Tergooi Hospital, Blaricum, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Pediatrics, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Emma Children's Hospital, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Pediatrics, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Dutch fever without an apparent source (FWS) guidelines were published to timely recognize and treat serious infections. We determined the adherence to the Dutch FWS guidelines and the percentage of serious infections in infants younger than 3 months of age. Second, we identified which clinical criteria, diagnostic tests, and management were associated with nonadherence to the guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in 2 Dutch teaching hospitals. We assessed the charts of all infants with FWS who presented at the emergency departments from September 30, 2017, to October 1, 2019. Diagnostic and therapeutic decisions were compared with the recommendations, as published in the Dutch guidelines. Infants were categorized into the nonadherence group in case 1 or more recommendations were not adhered to. RESULTS: Data on 231 infants were studied; 51.5% of the cases adhered to the Dutch guidelines and 16.0% suffered from a serious infection. The percentage of infants with a serious infection was higher in the adherence compared with the nonadherence group. We observed no relevant differences in clinical outcomes. Univariate regression analysis showed that an abnormal white blood cell count was associated with nonadherence (OR 0.4, P = 0.049). Not obtaining a urine and blood culture and not starting intravenous antibiotic treatment were the most frequent reasons for nonadherence to the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that there was nonadherence in a large proportion of FWS cases. The guidelines may need to be adjusted to increase adherence.
BACKGROUND: The Dutch fever without an apparent source (FWS) guidelines were published to timely recognize and treat serious infections. We determined the adherence to the Dutch FWS guidelines and the percentage of serious infections in infants younger than 3 months of age. Second, we identified which clinical criteria, diagnostic tests, and management were associated with nonadherence to the guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in 2 Dutch teaching hospitals. We assessed the charts of all infants with FWS who presented at the emergency departments from September 30, 2017, to October 1, 2019. Diagnostic and therapeutic decisions were compared with the recommendations, as published in the Dutch guidelines. Infants were categorized into the nonadherence group in case 1 or more recommendations were not adhered to. RESULTS: Data on 231 infants were studied; 51.5% of the cases adhered to the Dutch guidelines and 16.0% suffered from a serious infection. The percentage of infants with a serious infection was higher in the adherence compared with the nonadherence group. We observed no relevant differences in clinical outcomes. Univariate regression analysis showed that an abnormal white blood cell count was associated with nonadherence (OR 0.4, P = 0.049). Not obtaining a urine and blood culture and not starting intravenous antibiotic treatment were the most frequent reasons for nonadherence to the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that there was nonadherence in a large proportion of FWS cases. The guidelines may need to be adjusted to increase adherence.