Jessica Liauw1, Serena Gundy2, Bram Rochwerg3, Jennifer A Hutcheon4. 1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, BC Women's Hospital, University of British Columbia, C420-4500 Oak St., Vancouver V6H 3N1, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: jessica.liauw@medportal.ca. 2. Department of Medicine, Obstetric Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
To the Editors:In a recent article, Rasmussen et al recommend against the routine use of antenatal corticosteroids for fetal lung maturity in pregnant women with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We believe this recommendation warrants further discussion. First, we would like to highlight that the impact of corticosteroid treatment in nonpregnant patients with COVID-19 is currently unclear, precluding conclusions about likely maternal harm in the context of COVID-19. Second, we argue that in these unique circumstances, decision-making about the use of antenatal corticosteroids should keep in mind that the absolute benefits of antenatal corticosteroids for fetal lung maturity changes on a week-by-week basis during pregnancy.Rasmussen et al supported their recommendation against routine administration of corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation by citing evidence that outside of pregnancy, corticosteroids were not beneficial for the treatment of the Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) and may have led to decreased MERS coronavirus clearance. We believe it is important to better acknowledge the evolving state of evidence regarding corticosteroids in the treatment of COVID-19. A metaanalysis of observational data examining patients with viral pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) before this pandemic suggests corticosteroids may increase mortality; however, these findings are likely due to confounding by indication (sicker patients were more likely to receive corticosteroids). In contrast, among 201 patients who tested positive for COVID-19 with ARDS in China, of whom approximately 40% (n=84) received corticosteroids, treatment was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20–0.72). A randomized trial investigating corticosteroid use in patients with severe COVID-19 is currently ongoing, suggesting there is still equipoise in this issue.As the evidence regarding corticosteroid treatment for COVID-19 evolves, decision-making on the use of antenatal corticosteroids for fetal lung maturation in the context of COVID-19 will be aided by clear information on the fetal benefits it is being weighed against. It is important to recognize that the absolute benefits of antenatal corticosteroids differ on a week-by-week basis as gestational age advances and the baseline risks of neonatal morbidity decrease. In births of <34 weeks’ gestation, the absolute risk reduction of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome associated with antenatal corticosteroids is 128 fewer cases per 1000, from a baseline risk of 310 per 1000. In contrast, we recently estimated that the absolute risk reduction of neonatal ventilation of >6 hours associated with antenatal corticosteroids in those born at 34 weeks’ gestation is 24 fewer cases per 1000 (95% CI, 14–35), from a US population baseline risk of 64 per 1000, and at 36 weeks’ gestation, it is 7 fewer cases per 1000 (95% CI, 4–9), from a baseline risk of 17 per 1000.
,As obstetrical care providers strive to provide the best care in these unique circumstances, considering week-by-week absolute benefits of antenatal corticosteroids allows us to best weigh potential harms and benefits of this treatment alongside our critical care colleagues. These conversations will be crucial to minimizing maternal harm while reducing the burden of neonatal respiratory morbidity in a time when ventilation resources are of paramount importance.
Authors: Yaseen M Arabi; Yasser Mandourah; Fahad Al-Hameed; Anees A Sindi; Ghaleb A Almekhlafi; Mohamed A Hussein; Jesna Jose; Ruxandra Pinto; Awad Al-Omari; Ayman Kharaba; Abdullah Almotairi; Kasim Al Khatib; Basem Alraddadi; Sarah Shalhoub; Ahmed Abdulmomen; Ismael Qushmaq; Ahmed Mady; Othman Solaiman; Abdulsalam M Al-Aithan; Rajaa Al-Raddadi; Ahmed Ragab; Hanan H Balkhy; Abdulrahman Al Harthy; Ahmad M Deeb; Hanan Al Mutairi; Abdulaziz Al-Dawood; Laura Merson; Frederick G Hayden; Robert A Fowler Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Sonja A Rasmussen; John C Smulian; John A Lednicky; Tony S Wen; Denise J Jamieson Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 8.661