Literature DB >> 32857994

Nonintubated Versus Intubated Uniportal Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy for Lung Tumors.

Hao-Yun Liu1, Hsao-Hsun Hsu1, Tung-Ming Tsai2, Xu-Heng Chiang1, Tzu-Pin Lu3, Chia-Hong Chang4, Pei-Hsing Chen1, Man-Ling Wang5, Ming-Hui Hung6, Ya-Jung Cheng5, Mong-Wei Lin7, Jin-Shing Chen2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the use of the uniportal thoracoscopic technique has spread exponentially recently, a comparison of nonintubated and intubated uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomies for lung tumors has not been reported. We aimed to compare the feasibility, safety, and short-term postoperative outcomes between the 2 methods.
METHODS: From January 2014 to June 2019 we retrospectively reviewed 185 consecutive patients with lung tumors who underwent uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy at our institute. A body mass index of ≥25 kg/m2 was considered a contraindication for the nonintubated anesthetic approach. For the remaining cases the anesthetic approach was made at the discretion of each individual anesthesiologist. A propensity-matched analysis incorporating sex and body mass index was used to compare the clinical outcomes of the nonintubated and intubated groups.
RESULTS: Fifty patients (27.0%) underwent the procedure with the nonintubated anesthetic approach. The nonintubated group was more likely to be female (P < .001) and with a lower body mass index (P < .001). Other clinical features showed no significant difference. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in the type of segmentectomy according to the difficulty classification system. After propensity matching 43 matched patients in each group were included. Anesthetic induction duration (12.0 vs 15.3 minutes, P = .014) was shorter in the nonintubated group. No other significant differences in perioperative, postoperative, and anesthetic results were noted between the 2 matched groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The nonintubated anesthetic approach can be a safe and feasible alternative to intubated uniportal thoracoscopic segmentectomy.
Copyright © 2021 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32857994     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  4 in total

1.  The Anesthesiologist's Perspective Regarding Non-intubated Thoracic Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Giulio Luca Rosboch; Paraskevas Lyberis; Edoardo Ceraolo; Eleonora Balzani; Martina Cedrone; Federico Piccioni; Enrico Ruffini; Luca Brazzi; Francesco Guerrera
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-04

2.  Non-Intubated Versus Intubated Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Patients Aged 75 Years and Older: A Propensity Matching Study.

Authors:  Pei-Hsing Chen; Jen-Hao Chuang; Tzu-Pin Lu; Wan-Ting Hung; Hsien-Chi Liao; Tung-Ming Tsai; Mong-Wei Lin; Ke-Cheng Chen; Hsao-Hsun Hsu; Jin-Shing Chen
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-02

Review 3.  Anesthetic (r)evolution from the conventional concept to the minimally invasive techniques in thoracic surgery-narrative review.

Authors:  Zsolt Szabo; Csongor Fabo; Adam Oszlanyi; Fatime Hawchar; Tibor Géczi; Judit Lantos; Jozsef Furák
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 3.005

4.  SV-VATS exhibits dual intraoperative and postoperative advantages.

Authors:  Jia-Yang Xu; Yu-Jin Li; Xian-Gu Ning; Yang Yu; Feng-Xian Cui; Rong-Sheng Liu; Hao Peng; Zhan-Shan Ma; Jun Peng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.