| Literature DB >> 32857521 |
Sunit Kumar1, Yogesh Kumar Maurya1, Seongsoo Kang2, Piotr Chmielewski1, Tadeusz Lis1, Joanna Cybińska1,3, Dongho Kim2, Marcin Stępień1.
Abstract
Unsymmetrically fused porphyrins containing one or two naphthalimide subunits were prepared in modular syntheses relying on electron-rich and electron-poor pyrrole building blocks. These new chromophores show progressive changes in their electron-deficient character, while retaining comparably small optical and electrochemical band gaps. The intrinsic curvature and extended optical absorption of these systems make them of interest as mono- and difunctional components of multichromophoric assemblies.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32857521 PMCID: PMC7506948 DOI: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c02544
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Org Lett ISSN: 1523-7052 Impact factor: 6.005
Scheme 1Donor–Acceptor Porphyrins with Mixed Ring Fusion Patterns
Scheme 2Synthesis of Mixed Donor–Acceptor Porphyrins
Reagents and conditions: (a) pyridine, CH3CN/CHCl3 (1:1 v/v), 1 h; (b) HgO, HBF4, THF, 5 h; (c) (i) 6, NaBH4, THF/MeOH (3:1 v/v), 2 h, (ii) 7 (4, for 3a-H2), p-TSA, CHCl3/MeOH (100:1 v/v), 1 h; (iii) DDQ, 2 h; (d) Zn(OAc)2·2H2O, CHCl3/MeOH (3:1 v/v); (e) HCl, reflux, 24 h; (f) 2,6-diisopropylaniline, acetic acid, 20 h, reflux. Tol = p-tolyl, dipp = 2,6-diisopropylphenyl.
Figure 1Molecular structures and packing diagrams of 2b-H2 (A and C) and 3b-H2 (B and D) obtained in X-ray crystallographic analyses. C-bound hydrogen atoms (A and B) and solvent molecules (A–D) are omitted for clarity. Interplanar angles (A and B) were calculated between C10 planes of naphthalene (naph) and naphthalenemonoimide (NMI) subunits.
Figure 2Electronic absorption spectra of 2a-M, 2b-M, 3a-M, and 3b-M (5 μM concentration; M = 2H in dichloromethane, M = Zn in toluene + 1% pyridine).
Photophysical and Electrochemical Properties of Compounds 2a-M, 2b-M, 3a-M, and 3b-M (M = 2H, Zn)a,b
| Species | λmaxem [nm] | Δ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 778 (568) | 837 | 0.26 | –1.34 | 1.60 | |
| 823 (590) | 956 | 0.36 | –1.08 | 1.44 | |
| 803 (559) | 833 | 0.25 | –1.36 | 1.61 | |
| 834 (590) | 950 | 0.30 | –1.14 | 1.44 | |
| 775 (583) | 806 | 0.22 | –1.42 | 1.64 | |
| 838 (632) | 893 | 0.34 | –1.00 | 1.34 | |
| 780 (579) | 810 | 0.08 | –1.63 | 1.71 | |
| 864 (614) | 930 | 0.24 | –1.19 | 1.43 | |
| 768 (577) | 815 | 0.11 | –1.64 | 1.75 | |
| 852 (613) | 920 | 0.18 | –1.22 | 1.40 |
Data in dichloromethane. For additional data, see the Supporting Information.
Maximum absorption for the lowest-energy Q-band and for the most intense Soret band. Data for the previously reported[16]1a-Zn and 1b-Zn are provided for comparison.
Fluorescence emission maximum.
First oxidation and reduction potentials (relative to Fc/Fc+) and the electrochemical band gap.
Figure 3Electronic structure calculations for homologous NMI-fused porphyrins (M = 2H) and zinc porphyrins (M = Zn, B3LYP/6-31G(d,p), DCM solvation included for TD-DFT). Top: Kohn–Sham frontier MO levels for 1b′-M (R = H), 2b′-M and 3b′-M (R = H, R″ = Ph), and 8b′-M (D-type porphyrin with meso-phenyl substituents). Bottom: MO amplitudes and key TD-DFT transitions for 2b-Zn and 3b-Zn. Transition energies (nm) and oscillator strengths are shown in green.