Literature DB >> 3285732

Continuous infusion epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized, double-blind comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl versus 0.125% bupivacaine.

D H Chestnut1, C L Owen, J N Bates, L G Ostman, W W Choi, M W Geiger.   

Abstract

The analgesic efficacy of the continuous epidural infusion of 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl was compared with the infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine alone in a randomized, double-blind study of nulliparous women. Each patient received, in sequence: 1) 3 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine; 2) 6 ml of study solution 1 (bupivacaine-fentanyl group: 0.125% bupivacaine/0.0008% fentanyl; bupivacaine-only group: 0.25% bupivacaine alone); and 3) a continuous epidural infusion of study solution 2 at a rate of 12.5 ml/h (bupivacaine-fentanyl group: 0.0625% bupivacaine/0.0002% fentanyl; bupivacaine-only group: 0.125% bupivacaine alone). The epidural infusion was discontinued at full cervical dilatation, but patients who lacked perineal anesthesia received one or two 5-ml boluses of study solution 3 (bupivacaine-fentanyl group: 0.0625% bupivacaine alone; bupivacaine-only group: 0.125% bupivacaine alone). During the first stage of labor, 36 of 41 (88%) women in the bupivacaine-fentanyl group, and 37 of 39 (95%) women in the bupivacaine-only group, had analgesia of excellent or good quality (P = NS). During the second stage, 22 of 37 (59%) women in the bupivacaine-fentanyl group, and 23 of 35 (66%) women in the bupivacaine-only group, rated their analgesia as excellent or good (P = NS). Women in the bupivacaine-only group were more likely to have motor block at full cervical dilatation (P less than .001). There was no significant difference between groups in duration of the second stage of labor, duration of pushing, position of the vertex before delivery, method of delivery, Apgar scores, or umbilical cord blood gas and acid-base values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3285732

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  15 in total

1.  Epidural analgesia for labour and delivery: fentanyl or sufentanil?

Authors:  S Cohen; D Amar; C B Pantuck; E J Pantuck; E J Goodman; D H Leung
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 2.  Controversies in obstetric anaesthesia.

Authors:  K G Smedstad
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 5.063

3.  Continuous infusion epidural analgesia for obstetrics: bupivacaine versus bupivacaine-fentanyl mixture.

Authors:  R D Elliott
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 4.  Epidural analgesia for childbirth: effects of newer techniques on neonatal outcome.

Authors:  Giorgio Capogna; Michela Camorcia
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  Optimal labour analgesia 1996.

Authors:  T W Breen
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 6.  [Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].

Authors:  Maximiliaan van Erp; Clemens Ortner; Stefan Jochberger; Klaus Ulrich Klein
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-07-25

7.  Treatment with isoproterenol of bupivacaine toxicity.

Authors:  P Lacombe; G Blaise; F Plante; C Hollmann
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.063

8.  Analgesia methods during labour and delivery.

Authors:  S C Hughes
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 5.063

9.  Comparison of efficacy of bupivacaine and fentanyl with bupivacaine and sufentanil for epidural labor analgesia.

Authors:  Sumit Kalra; Namita Saraswat; G S Agnihotri
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2010-09

10.  [Perioperative analgesia in adults : The concept of balanced analgesia.].

Authors:  J Jage
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.107

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.