James E Andrews1, Nolan N Jones2, Minhee P Moody3, Aurora G Vincent1, Jeffrey C Teixeira1, Roy F Thomas1, Marc H Hohman1. 1. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington, USA. 2. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. 3. F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Abstract
Background: Many surgeons refuse to perform elective nasal surgery in active smokers, but little literature exists that addresses the risks of doing so; we sought to quantify the differences in outcomes after nasal surgery among smokers, previous smokers, and nonsmokers by measuring complication rates, revision rates, and improvement in Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores. Methods: We performed a single institution retrospective review of patients undergoing nasoseptal surgery. Specifically, we noted demographic characteristics, smoking status, surgery type, and pre- and postoperative NOSE scores. We compared NOSE scores, complication rates, and revision rates among current smokers, previous smokers, and never smokers. Results: Five hundred thirty patients were included for complication and revision rate analysis; there was no difference in complication or revision rates among patients of different smoking categories. Two hundred ninety-one patients completed pre- and postoperative NOSE scores. Scores for all surgeries and in all smoking categories improved postoperatively (p < 0.001). There was a difference in NOSE score change among surgical groups, with rhinoplasty resulting in the greatest improvement (p = 0.044). There was no difference in NOSE score improvement across smoking categories. Conclusion: Active smokers benefit from surgical intervention and can expect a similar improvement in nasal breathing to their nonsmoking counterparts if they meet indications for and undergo nasal surgery.
Background: Many surgeons refuse to perform elective nasal surgery in active smokers, but little literature exists that addresses the risks of doing so; we sought to quantify the differences in outcomes after nasal surgery among smokers, previous smokers, and nonsmokers by measuring complication rates, revision rates, and improvement in Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scores. Methods: We performed a single institution retrospective review of patients undergoing nasoseptal surgery. Specifically, we noted demographic characteristics, smoking status, surgery type, and pre- and postoperative NOSE scores. We compared NOSE scores, complication rates, and revision rates among current smokers, previous smokers, and never smokers. Results: Five hundred thirty patients were included for complication and revision rate analysis; there was no difference in complication or revision rates among patients of different smoking categories. Two hundred ninety-one patients completed pre- and postoperative NOSE scores. Scores for all surgeries and in all smoking categories improved postoperatively (p < 0.001). There was a difference in NOSE score change among surgical groups, with rhinoplasty resulting in the greatest improvement (p = 0.044). There was no difference in NOSE score improvement across smoking categories. Conclusion: Active smokers benefit from surgical intervention and can expect a similar improvement in nasal breathing to their nonsmoking counterparts if they meet indications for and undergo nasal surgery.