Literature DB >> 32856427

Anatomy-based diagnostic criteria for complex body wall anomalies (CBWA).

Nieves Martín-Alguacil1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Precise diagnosis and classification of CBWA cases can be challenging. BSA are considered when there is a body wall anomaly, skeletal abnormalities, and the umbilical cord is anomalous, absent or rudimentary, and LBWC when there is a body wall and structural limb anomalies with or without craniofacial abnormalities.
METHODS: PubMed was searched for body stalk anomalies, limb body wall complex, body stalk anomalies and amniotic band syndrome, and limb body wall complex and amniotic band syndrome. Sixty nine articles were selected and reviewed. This article systematically classifies the variants of CBWA in 218 cases, the study is based on the embryological and anatomical criteria established by Martín-Alguacil and Avedillo to study BSA in the pig.
RESULTS: Eight different BSA presentation were defined. One hundred and eighty nine cases were classified as BSA, from which five were Type I, nine Type II, 20 Type III, 57 Type IV, 11Type V, 24 Type VI, 11 Type VII, and 52 Type VIII. Twenty six cases presented cranial phenotype, 114 abdominal phenotype, 42 cranio/abdominal overlapping phenotype, and five without defined phenotype. In addition, 52 BSA cases presented some kind of spinal dysraphism (SPDYS) and were classified as BSA/SPDYS, most of these cases did not show structural limb anomalies, except for three cases and were classified as LBWC/SPDYS.
CONCLUSION: This morphology-based classification represents a useful tool for clinical diagnosis, it helps to quantify and to evaluate CBWA in a precise, objective manner.
© 2020 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ABS; BSA; LBWC; classification; definition

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32856427      PMCID: PMC7549580          DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.1465

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med        ISSN: 2324-9269            Impact factor:   2.183


INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus on the definition and classification of complex body wall anomalies (CBWA). Recently an anatomical and embryological criteria was used to classify body wall anomalies with multiple congenital anomalies in the pig (Martín‐Alguacil & Avedillo, 2020a). Body stalk anomalies (BSA) were considered when there is a body wall anomaly, skeletal abnormalities, and the umbilical cord is anomalous, absent or rudimentary, and limb body wall complex (LBWC) when there is a body wall and structural limb anomalies with or without craniofacial abnormalities. The proposed classification distinguished the type of body wall (abdominoschisis and thoracoabdominoschisis) and limb anomalies. Based on the studies by Rittler et al. (2019), they defined limb structural anomalies on the basis of embryological failures, and considered nonstructural anomalies when they were thought to be caused by amniotic bands actions, and/or fetal movement restrictions (FMR), including arthrogryposis. Amelia and/or pelvic limbs phocomelia were evaluated as structural anomalies, and thoracic limbs phocomelia, arthrogryposis, ankyloses, and/or anomalous rotation as nonstructural limb anomalies (Martín‐Alguacil & Avedillo, 2020a). They established four types of presentation for BSA: (a) BSA Type I: fetus with spinal and umbilical cord (UC)anomalies, thoracoabdominoschisis, anal atresia and/or other internal organs structural anomalies, and structural limb anomalies; (b) BSA Type II: fetus with spinal and UC anomalies, thoracoabdominoschisis, anal atresia and/or other internal organs structural anomalies, and nonstructural limb anomalies; (c) BSA Type III: fetus with spinal and UC anomalies, abdominoschisis, anal atresia and/or other internal organs structural anomalies, and structural limb anomalies; and (d) BSA Type IV: fetus with spinal and UC anomalies, abdominoschisis, anal atresia and/or other internal organs structural anomalies, and nonstructural limb anomalies. Additionally they differentiated two types of LBWC; Type I: characterized by thoracoabdominoschisis and structural limb anomalies, and Type II: characterized by abdominoschisis and structural limb anomalies, which corresponded to BSA type I and type III. The aim of this study is to apply this anatomical‐ and embryological‐based criteria to classify CBWA cases found in the medical literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a morphological study designed to establish a precise criteria to differentiate and classify CBWA in an accurate manner. PubMed was searched using the following keywords: body stalk anomalies (158 articles), limb body wall complex (177 articles), body stalk anomalies and limb body wall complex (19 articles), body stalk anomalies and amniotic band syndrome(nine articles), and limb body wall complex and amniotic band syndrome (14 articles). Only articles containing clinical cases were selected and reviewed. A clear description of fetal anomalies found was necessary to be included in the study. Thus, articles without a complete postmortem clinical data were discarded. After revision, 76 articles were sort out, and from those 69 were selected, from which 218 cases were studied and classified. A fetus was considered BSA when presented the following clinical features: a body wall anomaly, skeletal abnormalities, and the UC anomalous, absent or rudimentary. And it was considered LBWC when presented body wall and structural limb anomalies with or without craniofacial abnormalities. This study distinguished the type of body wall (abdominoschisis and thoracoabdominoschisis) and limb anomalies. Amelia and/or pelvic limbs phocomelia were considered as structural anomalies, and thoracic limbs phocomelia, arthrogryposis, ankyloses, and/or anomalous rotation as nonstructural limb anomalies.

RESULTS

A summary of all the studied cases with the original diagnosis and the proposed classification is presented on Table 1. Cases with normal UC were not considered BSA, whereas not defined UC cases were considered for the BSA study. For this study eight BSA types were defined and presented on Table 2. BSA Type I: fetus with thoracoabdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous UC, structural limb defect, anal atresia or urinary and/or genital defect. BSA Type II: fetus with thoracoabdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous UC, nonstructural limb defect or no limb defect, anal atresia or urinary and/or genital defect. BSA Type III: fetus with abdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous UC, structural limb defect, anal atresia or urinary and/or genital defect. BSA Type IV: fetus with abdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous UC, nonstructural limb defect or no limb defect, anal atresia or urinary and/or genital defect. BSA Type V: fetus with thoracoabdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous UC, and structural limb defect. BSA Type VI: fetus with thoracoabdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous UC, and nonstructural limb defect. BSA Type VII: fetus with abdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous UC, and structural limb defect. BSA Type VIII: fetus with abdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous UC, and nonstructural limb or no limb defect. One hundred and eighty nine cases were classified as BSA, 21 as ABS with or without FMR, four as ABS/LBWC, two as OEIS, one as GS/FMR, and one as BWCA (Table 2). In addition, 47 BSA cases presenting structural limb anomalies were also classified as LBWC (Table 3). BSA with thoracoabdominoschisis (Type I, and Type V) were considered LBWC Type I, and BSA with abdominoschisis (Type III and Type VII) were considered LBWC Type II (Martín‐Alguacil & Avedillo, 2020a). Sixteen cases were classified as LBWC Type I, and 31 LBWC Type II. Some cases without spinal anomaly but presenting some other skeletal anomaly were classified as BSA and identified on Table 2.
Table 1

Summary of anomalies described in the studied cases

BWASPAUCALimb anomalyAACRA and/or FAASPDYSUA and/or GAABProposed classificationAuthors' diagnosis
Arici, Perçin, Ozer, Aslan, & Cetin, 2004 Ab++LLSA++BSA Type IIILBWC
SUALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Baruah & Choudhur, 2013 Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD phenotype
Bhat, Ilyas, & Dev, 2016 Case 1Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWC
SUAABD and SPDYS
phenotype
Case 2Ab+++BSA Type VIIILBWC
SUASPDYS phenotype
Case 3Ab+ND+BSA Type VIIILBWC
SPDYS phenotype
Bohîlţea et al., 2017 Ab++ULSA+BSA Type VIIBSA
LLNSALBWC Type II
CR phenotype
Bugge, 2012 Case 1ThAb+LLNSA+BSA Type IIBSA
ABD phenotype
Case 2Ab++LLSA++BSA Type IIIBSA
SUALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Case 3Ab+LLSA++BSA Type IIIBSA
SUALLNSALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Case 4Ab+LLNSA++BSA Type IVBSA
SUAABD phenotype
Case 5Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type IVBSA
SUAABD phenotype
Case 6ThAb++LLNSA+++BSA Type IIBSA
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 7Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVBSA
CR/ABD phenotype
Case 8Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type IVBSA
ABD phenotype
Case 9Ab++LLSA+++BSA Type IIIBSA
LBWC Type II
CR/ABD phenotype
Case 10Ab++LLSA+++BSA Type IIIBSA
SUALBWC Type II
CR/ABD phenotype
Case 11Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type IVBSA
SUAABD phenotype
Case 12Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type IVBSA
SUAABD phenotype
Case 13Ab++ULNSA+BSA Type VIIIBSA
SUACR phenotype
Case 14Ab++LLNSA++++BSA Type IVBSA
SUACR/ABD phenotype
Case 15Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type IVBSA
ABD phenotype
Case 16ThAb+SUAULNSA++BSA Type IIBSA
LLNSAABD phenotype
Chen, 2001 ThAb++ULSA++++BSA Type ILBWC
LBWC Type I
CR/ABD phenotype
Chen et al., 2007 Case 1ThAb+SUALLSA++BSA Type ILBWC
LLNSALBWC Type I
ABD phenotype
Case 2Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
SUAABD phenotype
Case 3Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
SUAABD phenotype
Case 4Ab++LLSA++BSA Type IIILBWC
SUALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Case 5Ab++LLSABSA Type VIILBWC
LBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Case 6ThAb+LLNSA++BSA Type IILBWC
ABD phenotype
Case 7Ab++LLSA++BSA Type IIILBWC
SUALLNSALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Case 8Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD phenotype
Case 9Ab++LLSABSA Type VIILBWC
SUALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Case 10Ab+NULSA++ABS/LBWC Type IILBWC
LLNSA
CR phenotype
Case 11Ab+NULSA++ABS/LBWC Type IILBWC
LLNSA
CR phenotype
Case 12Ab+NULSA++ABS/LBWC Type IILBWC
LLNSACR phenotype
Chen et al., 2009 Ab++LLSA++BSA Type IIILBWC
SUALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Chen, Chen, Su, & Wang, 2011 Ab+NULSA++ABS/LBWC Type IILBWC
LLNSA
CR phenotype
Chen et al., 2018 Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWC
ABD phenotype
Chikkannaiah, Dhumale, Kangle, & Shekar, 2013 Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
CR/ABD phenotype
Coleman et al., 2018 Case 1Ab+++OEISOEIS
Case 2Ab++LLSA++BSA Type IIIOEIS
LBWC Type II
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 3Ab+LLNSA++BSA Type IVOEIS
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 4Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVOEIS
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotypeLBWC
Case 5Ab+++OEISOEIS
SUA
Case 6Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type VIIIOEIS
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Colpaert et al., 2000 Case 1ThAb++ULNSABSA Type VILBWC
CR phenotype
Case 2Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 3Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
SUAABD phenotype
Case 4Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD phenotype
Craven, Carey, & Ward, 1997 Case 1Ab++LLSA++BSA Type IIILBWD
SUALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Case 2Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWD
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 3Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWD
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 4Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWD
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 5Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWD
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Crespo, Pinar, & Kostadinov, 2012 Case 1ThAb++ULNSA+++BSA Type IILBWC
SUACR/ABD and SPDYS phenotypeBSA
Case 2ThAb++ULSABSA Type VLBWC
SUALLNSALBWC Type IBSA
CR phenotype
Cusí, Torrents, Vila, Antich, & Carrera, 1996 Case 1Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 2Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 3AbNDULNSA++ABSLBWC
Case 4AbNDLLNSAABS/FMRLBWC
Case 5Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 6Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 7Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 8AbNDLLSA++ABSLBWC
Das, Maharana, Subudhi, & Rao, 2013 Ab++LLSA+BSA Type IIILBWC
LLNSALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Daskalakis & Nicolaides, 2002 Case 1Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVBSA
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 2Ab+NDLLNSABSA Type VIIIBSA
ABD phenotype
Daskalakis, Pilalis, Papadopoulos, & Antsaklis, 2003 Ab+++BSA Type IVBSA
ABD phenotype
Deruelle et al., 2000 Case 1ThAb++ULNSABSA Type VILBWC
LLNSACR/ABD phenotype
Case 2Ab+NDLLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 3Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 4Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Devi, Cicy, Thambi, & Poothiode, 2015 Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type VIIILBWC
CR/ABD and SPDYS phenotypeABSQ
D'Souza, Indrajit, & Menon, 2004 Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
SUAABD phenotype
Durga & Renukadevi, 2016 Ab++LLSA+BSA Type VIIABS
SUALLNSALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Fukumasu et al., 1993 Ab++LLSA++BSA Type IIILBWC
SUALLNSALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Gajzer et al., 2015 Case 1Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 2ThAb++ULSA++BSA Type ILBWC
LLNSALBWC Type I
CR/ABD phenotype
Case 3Gs+NLLNSAGs/FMRLBWC
Case 4Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
CR/ABD phenotype
Gazolla et al., 2014 Case 1+LLNSA++ABSLBWD
SUA
Case 2Ab++LLNSA++++BSA Type VIIILBWD
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 3Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWD
ABD phenotype
Case 4Ab+NLLNSA+ABSLBWD
Case 5Ab++LLNSABSA Type VIIILBWD
SUAABD phenotype
Case 6NLLNSA++ABSLBWD
Case 7Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWD
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 8Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type VIIILBWD
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Ginsberg, Cadkin, & Strom, 1997 Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVBSA
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Grigore, 2014 Ab++ULNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWC
CR phenotype
Gulczyński, Świątkowska‐Freund, Paluchowski, Hermann‐Okoniewska, & Iżycka‐Świeszewska, 2019 Case 1ThAb+NDLLSA+++BSA Type ILBWC
LBWC Type I
CR/ABD phenotype
Case 3Ab++LLSABSA Type VIILBWC
LBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Case 4Ab+LLNSABSA Type VIIILBWC
ABD phenotype
Case 5Ab+ULNSS+BSA Type VIIILBWC
LLNSACR/ABD phenotype
Case 6Ab++BSA Type VIIILBWC
CR phenotype
Case 7Ab++LLSABSA Type VIILBWC
LLNSALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Case 8Ab++LLNSA+.+BSA Type VIIILBWC
CR/ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 9Ab+LLNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWC
ABD phenotype
Case 10Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD phenotype
Case 11Ab++ULNSA++BSA Type VIIILBWC
LLNSACR/ABD phenotype
Gupta, Venkatesan, Chandra, Rajeswari, & Devi, 2015 Ab++LLSA+BSA Type VIIABS
SUALLNSALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Hacivelioglu & Tarim, 2010 Case 1Ab+NDULSA+BSA Type VIILBWC
LLNSALBWC Type II
CR/ ABD phenotype
Case 2Ab+NDLLSABSA Type VLBWC
LBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Case 3Ab+NDULNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWC
CR phenotype
Halder, 2010 Case 1ThAb++ULNSA++++BSA Type IIABS
LLNSACR/ABD phenotypeLBWC
Case 3ThAb+++BSA Type VIABS
CR phenotypeLBWC
Case 4ThAb+++BSA Type VIABS
CR phenotypeLBWC
Hartwig, Vermeij‐Keers, De Vries, Kagie, & Kragt, 1989 Case 1ThAb++LLNSA++BSA Type VILBWC
CR/ABD phenotype
Case 2Ab+LLSA++BSA Type IIILBWC
SUALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Case 3ThAb++ULNSABSA Type VILBWC
CR phenotype
Case 4ThAb++LLNSA++BSA Type IILBWC
SUAABD phenotype
Higuchi et al., 2013 Ab++LLNSABSA Type VIIIBSA
ABD phenotype
Hirokawa et al., 2003 Ab++BSA Type VIIIBSA
SUAND phenotype
Hunter, Seaver, & Stevenson, 2011 Case 1Ab++LLSA++BSA Type IIILBWD
SUALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Case 2Ab++LLSA++BSA Type IIILBWD
LLNSALBWC Type II
ABD phenotype
Case 3Ab++BSA Type VIII
CR phenotype
Case 4Ab+LLSA++++BSA Type IIILBWD
ULNSALBWC Type II
CR/ ABD phenotype
Iba et al., 2016 Case 1Ab++LLNSABSA Type VIIIBSA
ABD phenotype
Case 2Ab++LLNSABSA Type VIIIBSA
ABD phenotype
Jensen, Hägerstrand, Brun, & Löfgren, 1993 ThAb+ULSA++BSA Type VLBWC
LBWC Type I
CR phenotype
Jun, Ahn, Lee, Chi, & Cha, 1991 Ab++BSA Type VIIIBSA
ABD phenotype
Kamudhamas & Manusook, 2001 Case 1ThGs+NULNSAABS/FMRLBWC
Case 2Ab+NDULNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWC
CR phenotype
Kocherla, Kumari, & Kocherla, 2015 Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type VIIIBSC
CR/ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Kruszka et al., 2015 Case 1VACSNULNSA++Amyoplasia ABS/FMRLBWC
LLNSA
Case 2NLLNSA++ABSLBWC
Litwin, Merlob, & Grunebaum, 1988 Case 1Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
CR/ABD phenotype
Case 2Ab+LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD phenotype
Liu, Yu, Chang, & Chang, 2003 Ab++ULNSABSA Type VIIILBWC
SUACR phenotype
Managoli, Chaturvedi, Vilhekar, & Gagane, 2003 Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
SUACR/ABD phenotype
Mandrekar, Amoncar, Banaulikar, Sawant, & Pinto, 2014 Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVOEIX
ABD and SPDYS phenotypeBSA/LBWC
Maruyama et al., 2015 Ab+++BSA Type IVBSA
SUAABD phenotype
Mathai et al., 2009 Ab+LLNSA+BSA Type IVBSA
SUAABD phenotype
Moerman et al., 1992 Case 7Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type IVLBWC
SUAABD phenotype
Case 8Ab++ULNSA++BSA Type VIIILBWC
LLNSACR phenotype
Case 9ThAb++ULNSA++BSA Type VILBWC
SUALLNSACR/ABD phenotype
Case 10Ab++ULNSA++BSA Type VIIILBWC
LLNSACR/ABD phenotype
Case 11Th+++ABSLBWC
Case 12NDLLNSA++ABSLBWC
Case 13NULNSA++ABSLBWC
LLNSA
Case 14ThAb++ULNSA++BSA Type VILBWC
SUALLNSACR/ABD phenotype
Case 15ThAb++ULNSA++BSA Type VILBWC
LLNSACR/ABD phenotype
Case 16ThAb++ULNSA++BSA Type VILBWC
CR phenotype
Case 17Ab++LLNSABSA Type VIIILBWC
SUACR/ABD phenotype
Case 18Ab++ULNSABSA Type VIIILBWC
LLNSACR/ABD phenotype
Negishi et al., 1998 Case 1Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
SUAABD phenotype
Case 2ThAb++LLSA+BSA Type VLBWC
SUALLNSALBWC Type I
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 3Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
SUACR/ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 4Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWC
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 5ThAb+SUAULNSA+++BSA Type ILBWC
LLSALBWC Type I
CR/ABD phenotype
Case 6Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type VIIILBWC
SUACR/ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 7Ab++LLNSABSA Type VIIILBWC
ABD phenotype
Case 8Ab++LLNSABSA Type VIIILBWC
SUACR/ABD phenotype
Okido et al., 2017 ThAb++ULSABSA Type VLBWC
LBWC Type I
CR phenotype
Palacios & Rodriguez, 1990 Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Patten et al., 1986 Case 1Ab+NDLLNSA+BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD phenotype
Case 2ThAb++ULSA+BSA Type VLBWC
LBWC Type I
CR phenotype
Case 3Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type VIIILBWC
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 4Ab++ULSA+BSA Type VIILBWC
LLNSALBWC Type II
CR/ABD phenotype
Case 5ThAb++LLNSA++BSA Type IILBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 6ThAb++ULNSA++BSA Type VILBWC
SUALLNSACR/ABD phenotype
Case 7ThAb+NDULNSA++BSA Type VILBWC
CR and SPDYS phenotype
Case 8Ab+++BSA Type VIIILBWC
CR phenotype
Case 9ThAb+NDLLSA++BSA Type VLBWC
LBWC Type I
CR/ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 10ThAbNDULNSABSA Type VILBWC
CR phenotype
Case 11ThAb+NDLLNSA+BSA Type VILBWC
CR phenotype
Case 12ThAb++LLNSABSA Type VILBWC
SUANSDLLABD phenotype
Case 13ThAb+NDLLNSA+BSA Type VILBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Paul, Zosmer, Jurkovic, & Nicolaides, 2001 Ab+NDLLNSABSA Type VIIIBSA
ABD phenotype
Plakkal, John, Jacob, Chithira, & Sampath, 2008 ThAb++ULSABSA Type VLBWC
LBWC Type I
CR phenotype
Prasun, Behera, & Pradhan, 2008 Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD phenotype
Pumberger, Schaller, & Bernaschek, 2001 Case 1Ab+NDLLSA+++BSA Type IIILBWC
LBWC Type II
CR/ABD phenotype
Case 2Ab+NDLLSA++++BSA Type IIILBWC
LBWC Type II
CR/ABD phenotype
Case 3Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type IVLBWC
SUAABD phenotype
Case 4ThAb++LLNSA+BSA Type IILBWC
ABD phenotype
Quijano, Rey, Echeverry, & Axt‐Fliedner, 2014 Ab++LLSA+BSA Type VIIBSA
LLNSALBWC Type II
CR/ABD phenotype
Rachad, Chaara, Bouguern, & Melhouf, 2012 Ab++ULSA+BSA Type VIILBWC
LLNSALBWC Type II
CR/ABD phenotype
Routhu et al., 2016 Case 1NDULSA+ABSABS
ULNSA
Case 2NDLLSA+ABSABS
Case 3Ab+NLLNSA+ABS/FMRBSA
ABS
Case 4Ab+NLLNSAABS/FMRBSA
ABS
Case 5ThAb+++BSA Type VIBSA
CR phenotypeABS
Case 6Ab+N+++ABS/FMRBSA
ABS
Case 7Ab+LLNSABSA Type VIIIBSA
ABD phenotypeABS
Case 8ThAb++LLNSABSA Type VIBSA
ABD phenotypeABS
Case 9ThAbNDBWCABSA ABS
Case 10Ab+NLLNSAABS/FMRBSA
ABS
Russo, D'Armiento, Angrisani, & Vecchione, 1993 Case 1Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 2Ab+NDLLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 3Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 4Ab++LLNSA++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD phenotype
Case 5Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 6Ab++LLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 7Ab+NDLLNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC
ABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 8Ab+NDLLSA++BSA Type IIILBWC
LBWC Type I
ABD phenotype
Sahinoglu et al., 2007 Case 1Ab++LLSA+BSA Type IIIType 3
LLNSALBWC Type IILBWC
ABD phenotype
Case 2Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type IVType 3
ABD phenotypeLBWC
Case 3Ab++NSBSA Type VIIIType 3
SUAABD phenotypeLBWC
Case 4ThAb++ULSA+BSA Type VType 2
SUALLNSALBWC Type ILBWC
CR/ABD phenotype
Case 5+ULSA+++ABS/FMRType 1
LLNSALBWC
Case 6ThAb++ULSABSA Type VType 2
SUALBWC Type ILBWC
CR phenotype
Saritha et al., 2013 Ab++ULSA+BSA Type IVLBWC
ULNSALBWC Type II
CR/ABD phenotype
Smrcek et al., 2003 Case 1ThAb++BSA Type VIBSA
ND phenotype
Case 2ThAb+BSA Type VI
SUAND phenotype
Case 3ThAb++ULSABSA Type VBSA
LLNSALBWC Type I
CR/ABD phenotype
Case 4Ab++BSA Type VIII
SUAND phenotype
Case 5Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type VIIIBSA
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 6ThAb++LLNSABSA Type VIBSA
ABD phenotype
Case 7Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type VIIIBSA
SUAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Case 8Ab++LLNSA+BSA Type IVBSA
SUAABD phenotype
Case 9Ab++BSA Type VIIIBSA
ND phenotype
Case 10ThAb++LLNSABSA Type VIBSA
ABD phenotype
Case 11Ab++BSA Type VIIIBSA
CR phenotype
Stein et al., 2009 ThAb+LLNSA+BSA Type VICantrell/LBWC
CR/ABD phenotype
Tang, Oechler, Hinke, Segura, & Franciosi, 1991 Ab++ULNSA+++BSA Type IVLBWC Sirenomelia
SUALLNSAABD and SPDYS phenotype
Vujovic et al., 2017 ThULNSAABS/FMRLBWC
Wu, Yang, & Yuan, 2000 Ab+LLNSA++ABS/FMRLBWC
Zeidler, Oudesluijs, Schoonderwaldt, & Van Bever, 2014 ThAb+LLNSA++BSA Type VILBWS
SUACR/ABD phenotypeBSA
AB

Abbreviations: AA, Anal atresia; Ab, Abdominoschisis; AB, Amniotic band; ABD, Abdominal; ABS, amniotic band syndrome; BSA, Body Stalk Anomaly; BSC, Body stalk complex; BWA, body wall anomaly; BWCA, Body wall closing anomaly; CR, cranial; CRA, cranial anomaly; FAA, Facial anomaly; FMR, Fetal movement restriction; GA, Genital anomaly; Gs, Gastroschisis; LBWC, Limb Body Wall Complex; LBWD, Limb Body Wall Defect; LBWS, limb body wall sequence; LLNSA, Lower limb nonstructural anomaly; LLSA, Lower limb structural anomaly; N, Normal; ND, not defined; SPDYS, Spinal dysraphism; UA, Urinary anomaly; UCA, Umbilical cord anomaly; ULNSA, Upper limb nonstructural anomaly; ULSA, Upper limb structural anomaly; VACS, Ventral anomaly covered with skin; SPA, spine anomaly; SPDYS, Spinal dysraphism; SUA, Single umbilical artery; Th, thoracoschisis; ThAb, thoracoabdominoschisis.

Table 2

CBWD cases classification

BSAClinical features# BSA
Type IThoracoabdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous umbilical cord, structural limb defect, anal atresia or urinary and/or genital defect.Chen, 2001; Chen et al., 2007 Case 1; Gajzer et al., 2015 Case 2; Gulczyński et al., 2019 Case 1; Negishi et al., 1998 Case 55/189
2.64%
Type IIThoracoabdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous umbilical cord, nonstructural limb defect or no limb defect, anal atresia or urinary and/or genital defect.Bugge, 2012 Cases: 1 a , 6, 16; Chen et al., 2007 Case 6 a ; Crespo et al., 2012 Case 1; Halder, 2010 Case 1; Hartwig et al., 1989 Case 4; Patten et al., 1986 Case 5; Pumberger et al., 2001 Case 49/189
4.76%
Type IIIAbdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous umbilical cord, structural limb defect, anal atresia or urinary and/or genital defect.Arici et al., 2004;Bugge, 2012 Cases: 2, 3 a , 9, 10; Chen et al., 2007 Cases: 4, 7; Chen et al., 2009; Coleman et al., 2018 Case 2; Craven et al., 1997 Case 1; Das et al., 2013; Fukumasu et al., 1993; Hartwig et al., 1989 Case 2 a ; Hunter et al., 2011 Cases: 1, 2, 4 a ; Pumberger et al., 2001 Cases: 1, 2; Russo et al., 1993 Case 8; Sahinoglu et al., 2007 Case 120/189
10.58%
Type IVAbdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous umbilical cord, nonstructural limb defect or no limb defect, anal atresia or urinary and/or genital defect.Baruah & Choudhur, 2013; Bugge, 2012 Cases: 4 a , 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 14, 15; Chen et al., 2007 Cases: 2, 3, 8; Chikkannaiah et al., 2013; Coleman et al., 2018 Cases: 3, 4; Colpaert et al., 2000 Cases: 2, 3, 4; Craven et al., 1997 Cases: 2–5; Cusí et al.,1996 Cases: 1, 2; Daskalakis & Nicolaides, 2002 Case 1; Daskalakis et al., 2003; Deruelle et al., 2000 Cases: 2, 4; D'Souza et al., 2004; Gajzer et al., 2015 Cases: 1, 4; Ginsberg et al., 1997; Gulczyński et al., 2019 Case 10; Litwin et al., 1988 Cases: 1, 2; Managoli et al., 2003; Mandrekar et al., 2014; Maruyama et al., 2015; Mathai et al., 2009, a ; Moerman et al., 1992 Case 7; Negishi et al., 1998 Cases: 1, 3; Palacios & Rodriguez, 1990; Patten et al., 1986 Case 1; Prasun et al., 2008; Pumberger et al., 2001 Case 3; Russo et al., 1993 Cases: 1–7; Sahinoglu et al., 2007 Case 2; Saritha et al., 2013; Smrcek et al., 2003 Case 8; Tang et al., 1991 57/189
30.15%
Type VThoracoabdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous umbilical cord, and structural limb defect.Crespo et al., 2012 Case 2; Hacivelioglu & Tarim, 2010 Case 2; Jensen et al., 1993 a ; Negishi et al., 1998 Case 2; Okido et al., 2017; Patten et al., 1986 Cases: 2, 9; Plakkal et al., 2008; Sahinoglu et al., 2007 Cases: 4, 6; Smrcek et al., 2003 Case 311/189
5.82%
Type VIThoracoabdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous umbilical cord, and nonstructural limb defect.Colpaert et al., 2000 Case 1; Deruelle et al., 2000 Case 1; Halder, 2010 Cases: 3 a , 4 a ; Hartwig et al., 1989 Cases: 1, 3; Moerman et al., 1992 Cases: 9, 14–16; Patten et al., 1986 Cases: 6, 7, 10–13; Routhu et al., 2016 Cases: 5, 8; Smrcek et al., 2003 Cases: 1, 2, 6, 10; Stein et al., 2009;Zeidler et al., 2014 24/189
12.69%
Type VIIAbdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous umbilical cord, and structural limb defect.Bohîlţea et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2007 Cases: 5, 9; Durga & Renukadevi, 2016; Gulczyński et al., 2019 Cases: 3, 7; Gupta et al., 2015; Hacivelioglu & Tarim, 2010 Case 1; Patten et al., 1986 Case 4; Quijano et al., 2014; Rachad et al., 2012 11/189
5.82%
Type VIIIAbdominoschisis, spinal defect, anomalous umbilical cord, and nonstructural limb or no limb defect.Bhat et al., 2016 Cases: 1–3; Bugge, 2012 Case 13; Chen et al., 2018; Coleman et al., 2018 Cases: 6; Cusí et al.,1996 Cases: 5, 6, 7; Daskalakis & Nicolaides, 2002 Case 2; Deruelle et al., 2000 Case 3; Devi et al., 2015; Gazolla et al., 2014 Cases: 2, 3, 5, 7, 8; Grigore, 2014; Gulczyński et al., 2019 Cases: 4–6, 8, 9, 11; Hacivelioglu & Tarim, 2010 Case 3; Higuchi et al., 2013; Hirokawa et al., 2003; Hunter et al., 2011 Case 3 a ; Iba et al., 2016 Cases: 1, 2; Jun et al., 1991; Kamudhamas & Manusook, 2001 Case 2; Kocherla et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2003; Moerman et al., 1992 Cases: 8, 10, 17, 18; Negishi et al., 1998 Cases: 4, 6, 7, 8; Patten et al., 1986 Cases: 3, 8; Paul et al., 2001; Routhu et al., 2016 Case 7; Sahinoglu et al., 2007 Case 3; Smrcek et al., 2003 Cases: 4, 5, 7, 9, 1152/189
27.51%

Abbreviation: BSA, Body stalk anomalies.

No spinal defect.

Table 3

Phenotypes of the studied cases

BSA PhenotypesLimb anomalyCASES
CRANIALSLABohîlţea et al., 2017; Crespo et al., 2012 Case 2; Jensen et al., 1993; Okido et al., 2017; Patten et al., 1986 Case 2; Plakkal et al., 2008; Sahinoglu et al., 2007 Case 67/189
LBWC3.7%
NSLABugge, 2012 Case 13; Colpaert et al., 2000 Case 1; Grigore, 2014; Gulczyński et al., 2019 Case 6; Hacivelioglu & Tarim, 2010 Case 3;Halder, 2010 Cases: 3, 4; Hartwig et al., 1989 Case 3; Hunter et al., 2011 Case 3; Kamudhamas & Manusook, 2001 Case 2; Liu et al., 2003; Moerman et al., 1992 Cases: 8, 16; Patten et al., 1986 Cases: 7, 8, 10, 11; Routhu et al., 2016 Case 5; Smrcek et al., 2003 Case 1119/189
10.05%
ABDOMINALSLAArici et al., 2004; Bugge, 2012 Cases: 2, 3; Chen et al., 2007 Cases: 1, 4, 5, 7, 9; Chen et al., 2009; Coleman et al., 2018 Case 2; Craven et al., 1997 Case 1; Das et al., 2013; Durga & Renukadevi, 2016; Fukumasu et al., 1993; Gulczyński et al., 2019 Cases: 2, 7; Gupta et al., 2015; Hacivelioglu & Tarim, 2010 Case 2; Hartwig et al., 1989 Case 2; Hunter et al., 2011 Cases: 1, 2; Negishi et al., 1998 Case 2; Russo et al., 1993 Case 8; Sahinoglu et al., 2007 Case 124/189
LBWC12.69%
NSLABaruah & Choudhur, 2013; Bhat et al., 2016 Cases: 1; Bugge, 2012 Cases: 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 11, 12, 15, 16; Chen et al., 2007 Cases: 2, 3, 6, 8; Chen et al., 2018; Coleman et al., 2018 Cases: 3–6; Colpaert et al., 2000 Cases: 2–4; Craven et al., 1997 Cases: 2–5; Cusí et al.,1996 Cases: 1, 2, 5, 6, 7; Daskalakis & Nicolaides, 2002 Cases: 1, 2; Daskalakis et al., 2003; Deruelle et al., 2000 Cases: 2–4; D'Souza et al., 2004; Gajzer et al., 2015 Case 1; Gazolla et al., 2014 Cases: 2, 3, 5, 7, 8; Ginsberg et al., 1997; Gulczyński et al., 2019 Cases: 4, 9, 10; Hartwig et al., 1989 Case 4; Higuchi et al., 2013; Iba et al., 2016 Cases: 1, 2; Jun et al., 1991; Litwin et al., 1988 Case 2; Mandrekar et al., 2014; Maruyama et al., 2015; Mathai et al., 2009; Moerman et al., 1992 Case 7; Negishi et al., 1998 Cases: 1, 3, 4, 7; Palacios & Rodriguez, 1990; Patten et al., 1986 Cases: 1, 3, 5, 12, 13; Paul et al., 2001; Prasun et al., 2008; Pumberger et al., 2001 Cases: 3 a , 4; Routhu et al., 2016 Cases: 7, 8; Russo et al., 1993 Cases: 1–7; Sahinoglu et al., 2007 Cases: 2, 3; Smrcek et al., 2003 Cases: 5–8, 10; Tang et al., 1991, a 90/189
47.61%
OVERLAPPED CR/ABSLABugge, 2012 Cases: 9, 10; Chen, 2001; Gajzer et al., 2015 Case 2; Gulczyński et al., 2019 Case 1; Hacivelioglu & Tarim, 2010 Case 1; Hunter et al., 2011 Case 4; Managoli et al., 2003; Negishi et al., 1998 Case 5; Patten et al., 1986 Case 4; Pumberger et al., 2001 Cases: 1, 2; Quijano et al., 2014; Rachad et al., 2012; Sahinoglu et al., 2007 Case 415/189
LBWC7.93%
NSLABugge, 2012 Cases: 7, 14; Chikkannaiah et al., 2013; Crespo et al., 2012 Case 1; Deruelle et al., 2000 Case 1; Devi et al., 2015; Gajzer et al., 2015 Case 4; Gulczyński et al., 2019 Cases: 5, 8, 11; Halder, 2010 Case 1; Hartwig et al., 1989 Case 1; Kocherla et al., 2015; Litwin et al., 1988 Case 1; Moerman et al., 1992 Cases: 9, 10, 14, 15, 17, 18; Negishi et al., 1998 Cases: 6, 8; Patten et al., 1986 Case 6; Saritha et al., 2013; Smrcek et al., 2003 Case 3; Stein et al., 2009; Zeidler et al., 2014 27/189
14.28%
NO DEFINEDHirokawa et al., 2003; Smrcek et al., 2003 Cases: 1, 2, 4, 95/189
2.64%
SPDYSSLAColeman et al., 2018 Case 2; Negishi et al., 1998 Case 2; Patten et al., 1986, Case 93/189
LBWC1.58%
NSLABhat et al., 2016 Cases: 1–3; Bugge, 2012 Cases: 6, 14; Coleman et al., 2018 Cases: 3, 4, 6; Colpaert et al., 2000 Case 2; Craven et al., 1997 Cases: 2–5; Cusí et al.,1996 Cases: 1, 2, 5–7; Daskalakis & Nicolaides, 2002 Case 1; Deruelle et al., 2000 Case 2–4; Devi et al., 2015; Gajzer et al., 2015 Case 1; Gazolla et al., 2014 Cases: 2, 7, 8; Ginsberg et al., 1997; Gulczyński et al., 2019 Case 8; Kocherla et al., 2015; Mandrekar et al., 2014; Negishi et al., 1998 Cases: 3, 4, 6; Palacios & Rodriguez, 1990; Patten et al., 1986 Cases: 3, 5, 7, 13; Russo et al., 1993 Cases: 1–3, 5–7; Smrcek et al., 2003 Cases: 5, 7; Tang et al., 1991 48/189
25.39%

ABDOMINAL: fetus with body wall anomaly, lower limb anomaly, anal atresia or urinary and/or genital anomaly. CRANIAL: fetus with body wall anomaly, upper limb anomaly and/or craniofacial anomaly, and/or diaphragm anomaly or other thoracic anomalies (heart or lungs anomalies). OVERLAPPED CR/AB: fetus with body wall anomaly, craniofacial anomaly, anal atresia and/or urinary and/or genital anomaly. SPDYS: fetus that additionally presented some kind of spinal dysraphism.

Abbreviations: BSA, body stalk anomalies; CR/AB, cranial abdominal; LBWC, limb body wall complex; NSLA, nonstructural limb anomaly or no limb anomaly; SLA, structural limb anomaly; SPDYS, spinal dysraphism.

Sirenomelia.

Summary of anomalies described in the studied cases Abbreviations: AA, Anal atresia; Ab, Abdominoschisis; AB, Amniotic band; ABD, Abdominal; ABS, amniotic band syndrome; BSA, Body Stalk Anomaly; BSC, Body stalk complex; BWA, body wall anomaly; BWCA, Body wall closing anomaly; CR, cranial; CRA, cranial anomaly; FAA, Facial anomaly; FMR, Fetal movement restriction; GA, Genital anomaly; Gs, Gastroschisis; LBWC, Limb Body Wall Complex; LBWD, Limb Body Wall Defect; LBWS, limb body wall sequence; LLNSA, Lower limb nonstructural anomaly; LLSA, Lower limb structural anomaly; N, Normal; ND, not defined; SPDYS, Spinal dysraphism; UA, Urinary anomaly; UCA, Umbilical cord anomaly; ULNSA, Upper limb nonstructural anomaly; ULSA, Upper limb structural anomaly; VACS, Ventral anomaly covered with skin; SPA, spine anomaly; SPDYS, Spinal dysraphism; SUA, Single umbilical artery; Th, thoracoschisis; ThAb, thoracoabdominoschisis. CBWD cases classification Abbreviation: BSA, Body stalk anomalies. No spinal defect. Phenotypes of the studied cases ABDOMINAL: fetus with body wall anomaly, lower limb anomaly, anal atresia or urinary and/or genital anomaly. CRANIAL: fetus with body wall anomaly, upper limb anomaly and/or craniofacial anomaly, and/or diaphragm anomaly or other thoracic anomalies (heart or lungs anomalies). OVERLAPPED CR/AB: fetus with body wall anomaly, craniofacial anomaly, anal atresia and/or urinary and/or genital anomaly. SPDYS: fetus that additionally presented some kind of spinal dysraphism. Abbreviations: BSA, body stalk anomalies; CR/AB, cranial abdominal; LBWC, limb body wall complex; NSLA, nonstructural limb anomaly or no limb anomaly; SLA, structural limb anomaly; SPDYS, spinal dysraphism. Sirenomelia.

DISCUSSION

In the original articles, LBWC was diagnosed in 148 cases (two of them with sirenomelia), BSA in 42 cases, OEIS in five cases, ABS in three cases, LBWC/BSA in three cases, OEIS/LBWC in one case, LBWC/ABS in one case, BSA/ABS in eight cases, LBWC/Cantrell in one case, LBWC/BSA/AB in one case, OEIS BSA/LBWC in one case, and for three cases no specific diagnosis was given. In addition, some cases which did not show body wall anomaly were diagnosed as LBWC but not as BSA (Gazolla et al., 2014 case 1; Kruszka et al., 2015 case 2; Moerman, Fryns, Vandenberghe, & Lauweryns, 1992 cases: 11, 12, and 13; Sahinoglu et al., 2007 case 5) and some others as ABS (Routhu, Thakkallapelli, Mohan, & Ahmed, 2016 cases 1 and 2). ABS may include body wall anomalies, cranial anomalies, and limb amputation. The presence of the characteristic anomalies is enough for ABS diagnosis, even if bands are not present (Martín‐Alguacil & Avedillo, 2020c). The presence of amniotic bands was described in 47 of the studied cases, from which 17 cases showed structural limb anomalies, 29 nonstructural limb anomalies, and one case with no limb anomalies (Table 1). Three different phenotypes were observed in the studied cases (cranial, abdominal, and cranial/abdominal phenotypes) and presented on Table 3. There were several cases: Hirokawa et al. (2003), and Smrcek et al. (2003) cases 1, 2, 4, and 9 that did not show specific cranial or abdominal anomalies and were not considered on Table 3.The higher incidence of SPDYS in the BSA classified cases (26.98% 51/189), made this author to consider an additional group called the SPDYS phenotype. Myelomeningocele was the most frequent anomaly among SPDYS described 80.3% (41/51). Most cases presenting SPDYS did not show structural limb anomalies, except for three cases that were classified as LBWC/SPDYS (Table 3). Additionally, 78.43% (40/51) of the SPDYS cases presented abdominal phenotype, 1.96% (1/51) cranial phenotype, 15.68% (8/51) CR/AB overlapped phenotype, and 2SPDYS cases did not show specific phenotype. The phenotype in the ABS classified cases was 11 abdominal, five cranial, three CR/AB overlapped phenotype, one CR/SPDYS, and two ABS cases did not show specific phenotype. All cases classified in this study as ABS were considered as LBWC in their original report (Gajzer et al., case 3; Kamudhamas & Manusook, 2001 case 1; Kruszka et al., 2015 cases: 1 and 2; Moerman et al., 1992 cases: 11–13; Sahinoglu et al., 2007 case 5; Vujovic et al., 2017), or as LBWD (Gazolla et al., 2014 cases 1 and 6), except for cases 1, 2, and 9 which were reported as ABS by Routhu et al. (2016).Case 3 reported as LBWC by Gajzer, Hirzel, Saigal, Rojas, and Rodriguez (2015) showed gastroschisis, normal UC, spinal anomaly, and clubfoot, thus it was not classified as BSA or LBWC. Gastroschisis is a full‐thickness abdominal wall occurring lateral to the UC, and, in most cases, is an isolated anomaly, but sometimes may occur in combination with other congenital anomalies as arthrogryposisin the hindlimbs (Martín‐Alguacil & Avedillo, 2020b). Stein, Haller, Hawighorst, and EmonsGöttingen (2009) reported a case with thoracoabdominoschisis, no spinal anomaly, normal UC, and nonstructural limb and craniofacial anomalies. This case was diagnosed in the original article as a complex malformation sharing features of LBWC and Cantrell Syndrome. Considering the studies of our group in the pig (Martín‐Alguacil & Avedillo, 2020b, 2020d), the case is herein classified as BSA VI (Table 2). The proposed classification is based on anatomical features and on presumptive etiology of the limb anomalies as unifying criterion for a precise diagnosis and classification of CBWA when limbs are affected as in BSA, LBWC, and/or ABS.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The author have no potential conflict of interests.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Nieves Martín‐Alguacil is the only author and contributor to this manuscript. She is responsible for the conception and design, analysis, and interpretation of data. And also responsible for drafting and revising the manuscript for intellectual content. She gave the final approval of the version to be published. And agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
  73 in total

1.  A case of body stalk anomaly at 10 weeks of gestation.

Authors:  C Paul; N Zosmer; D Jurkovic; K Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and management of body stalk anomaly: analysis of nine singleton and two multiple pregnancies.

Authors:  J M Smrcek; U Germer; M Krokowski; C Berg; M Krapp; A Geipel; U Gembruch
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 3.  Limb-body wall complex in one fetus of a dizygotic twin pregnancy conceived by egg donation, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: prenatal diagnosis and literature review.

Authors:  Chih-Ping Chen; Maw-Shuan Lee; Fuu-Jen Tsai; Ming-Chao Huang; Schu-Rern Chern; Wayseen Wang
Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.705

4.  Limb body wall malformation complex associated with vascular steal.

Authors:  J Palacios; J I Rodriguez
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Limb body wall complex: analysis of eight fetuses.

Authors:  V Cusí; M Torrents; J Vila; J Antich; J M Carrera
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1996

6.  Amniotic Band Syndrome - A Dreaded Condition.

Authors:  Durga R; T K Renukadevi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

Review 7.  Complete absence of external genitalia in limb-body wall complex: two cases.

Authors:  A Litwin; P Merlob; M Grunebaum
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Prenatal diagnosis of limb-body wall complex.

Authors:  H Negishi; M Yaegashi; E H Kato; H Yamada; K Okuyama; S Fujimoto
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 0.142

9.  Body stalk anomaly--a case report.

Authors:  S A Jun; M O Ahn; S S Lee; J G Chi; K S Cha
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of limb-body wall complex: case series of a rare congenital anomaly.

Authors:  Arshad Bhat; Mohd Ilyas; Ghanshyam Dev
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2016-03-15
View more
  1 in total

1.  First trimester diagnosis of body stalk anomaly complicated by ectopia cordis.

Authors:  Yi Yang; Hong Wang; Zhenpeng Wang; Xuefeng Pan; Ying Chen
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.671

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.