| Literature DB >> 32855636 |
Jian-Hua Huang1,2, Dan He1,2, Lin Chen1,2, Qing Du1, Rong Yu1,2, Ping Cai1,2, Shui-Han Zhang1.
Abstract
MATERIALS AND METHODS: MKR mice were used for the development of diabetes with high-fat diet feeding. These mice were further injected with streptozocin (STZ) to aggravate kidney failure. Fasting blood glucose (FBG) and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR values) were determined to validate the successful establishment of diabetic models with desired kidney dysfunction. Metabolomics approach coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and random forest (RF) algorithm was proposed to discover the metabolic differences among model group and control group as well as to examine the therapeutic efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine, Liu-Wei-Di-Huang-Wan (LWDHW), in diabetes and associated kidney failure.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32855636 PMCID: PMC7443003 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1306439
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Anal Chem ISSN: 1687-8760 Impact factor: 1.885
FBG and urinary ACR values of different groups before and after treatment.
| Groups | FBG before treatment (mmol/L) | FBG after treatment (mmol/L) | Urinary ACR before treatment (mg/g) | Urinary ACR after treatment (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKR group | 14.99 ± 2.022 | 13.95 ± 2.772 | 154.4 ± 6.976 | 185.2 ± 11.04 |
| Model control group | 7.855 ± 0.723 | 8.218 ± 0.9347 | 62.24 ± 6.201 | 83.04 ± 6.05 |
| Liu-Wei-Di-Huang group | 14.12 ± 1.656 | 9.509 ± 0.5752 | 150.8 ± 7.368 | 115.8 ± 6.968 |
| Western medicine group | 14.12 ± 1.224 | 8.718 ± 0.5307 | 151.2 ± 6.319 | 112.4 ± 7.232 |
| Normal control group | 5.145 ± 0.3417 | 5.209 ± 0.7355 | 5.382 ± 1.369 | 5.591 ± 1.436 |
Metabolite information of each group after 28 days of treatment.
| Id | TR (min) | Endogenous metabolites | Quantitatively results | HMDB | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MKR group | Model control group | Liu-Wei-Di-Huang group | Western medicine group | Normal control group | ||||
| 1 | 6.563 | Oxalic acid | 1.0081 ± 0.0647 | 1.1050 ± 0.0638 | 1.2981 ± 0.198 | 0.996 ± 0.126 | 1.2671 ± 0.0878 | HMDB 00190 |
| 2 | 7.329 | L-Lactic acid | 0.1151 ± 0.0176 | 0.0670 ± 0.0423 | 0.1443 ± 0.065 | 0.0831 ± 0.0639 | 0.0708 ± 0.0105 | HMDB 02329 |
| 3 | 8.244 | Butyric acid | 0.01684 ± 0.0013 | 0.01315 ± 0.0019 | 0.02088 ± 0.025 | 0.0136 ± 0.0057 | 0.023 ± 0.0043 | HMDB 00357 |
| 4 | 9.466 | 3-Hydroxybutyric acid | 0.0261 ± 0.0112 | 0.02191 ± 0.003 | 0.01906 ± 0.0122 | 0.01847 ± 0.0133 | 0.0135 ± 0.027 | HMDB 00883 |
| 5 | 10.165 | Urea | 0.74953 ± 0.3128 | 0.69655 ± 0.1089 | 1.19208 ± 0.1639 | 0.84024 ± 0.2563 | 0.6210 ± 0.0228 | HMDB 00294 |
| 6 | 10.756 | Phosphoric acid | 0.2025 ± 0.0374 | 0.25623 ± 0.0383 | 0.30031 ± 0.0406 | 0.23334 ± 0.0377 | 0.2436 ± 0.096 | HMDB 02142 |
| 7 | 11.283 | L-Proline | 0.01115 ± 0.0125 | 0.00575 ± 0.0092 | 0.01983 ± 0.0202 | 0.0093 ± 0.0004 | 0.0083 ± 0.0024 | HMDB 00162 |
| 8 | 11.469 | Glycine | 0.02126 ± 0.0054 | 0.01324 ± 0.0074 | 0.01126 ± 0.0134 | 0.00862 ± 0.0075 | 0.0724 ± 0.0012 | HMDB 00123 |
| 9 | 10.397 | Serine | 0.00258 ± 0.0023 | 0.00646 ± 0.0069 | 0.00137 ± 0.0017 | 0.00148 ± 0.0019 | 0.00132 ± 0.0009 | HMDB 00187 |
| 10 | 11.185 | L-Threonine | 0.02325 ± 0.0226 | 0.02313 ± 0.0046 | 0.03143 ± 0.0357 | 0.02225 ± 0.0106 | 0.0235 ± 0.0109 | HMDB 00167 |
| 11 | 14.985 | L-Aspartic acid | 0.00942 ± 0.002 | 0.0082 ± 0.0056 | 0.00485 ± 0.0042 | 0.00481 ± 0.0068 | 0.00422 ± 0.0058 | HMDB 00191 |
| 12 | 16.033 | Erythronic acid | 0.1006 ± 0.0172 | 0.06606 ± 0.0155 | 0.10925 ± 0.0136 | 0.05299 ± 0.001 | 0.06129 ± 0.0034 | HMDB 00182 |
| 13 | 18.024 | L-Glutamine | 0.00405 ± 0.0036 | 0.0082 ± 0.0078 | 0.00763 ± 0.0062 | 0.0088 ± 0.012 | 0.0062 ± 0.0013 | HMDB 00641 |
| 14 | 19.076 | Citric acid | 0.05004 ± 0.0105 | 0.02826 ± 0.004 | 0.02627 ± 0.0077 | 0.02318 ± 0.0053 | 0.0136 ± 0.0015 | HMDB 00094 |
| 15 | 19.556 | N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine | 0.01069 ± 0.0094 | 0.00412 ± 0.0038 | 0.00769 ± 0.0025 | 0.00142 ± 0.002 | 0.0011 ± 0.0001 | HMDB 00660 |
| 16 | 20.427 | D-Galactose | 0.0155 ± 0.0027 | 0.01657 ± 0.0017 | 0.01977 ± 0.0087 | 0.02058 ± 0.0041 | 0.00188 ± 0.0041 | HMDB 00143 |
| 17 | 22.175 | D-Mannose | 0.01267 ± 0.012 | 0.01474 ± 0.0128 | 0.02510 ± 0.0041 | 0.01819 ± 0.0013 | 0.0186 ± 0.017 | HMDB 00169 |
| 18 | 22.667 | Mannitol | 0.44126 ± 0.0853 | 0.43875 ± 0.0532 | 0.60073 ± 0.1016 | 0.46482 ± 0.0544 | 0.5924 ± 0.0454 | HMDB 00143 |
| 19 | 22.386 | D-Glucose | 1.58832 ± 0.1782 | 1.67471 ± 0.0979 | 1.27004 ± 0.1011 | 1.39533 ± 0.208 | 1.3509 ± 0.1477 | HMDB 00122 |
| 20 | 22.803 | L-Lysine | 0.01849 ± 0.018 | 0.00986 ± 0.0104 | 0.0481 ± 0.018 | 0.01357 ± 0.0078 | 0.0126 ± 0.0010 | HMDB 00182 |
| 21 | 23.076 | L-Tyrosine | 0.00374 ± 0.0065 | 0.00357 ± 0.0037 | 0.02989 ± 0.0305 | 0.00216 ± 0.0024 | 0.0219 ± 0.0032 | HMDB 00158 |
| 22 | 22.982 | D-Turanose | 0.00102 ± 0.0018 | 0.0136 ± 0.0062 | 0.01904 ± 0.0079 | 0.0268 ± 0.0038 | 0.0211 ± 0.0016 | HMDB 11740 |
| 23 | 23.734 | D-Arabinose | 0.02608 ± 0.0115 | 0.1043 ± 0.0943 | 0.05253 ± 0.0453 | 0.09482 ± 0.0859 | 0.0743 ± 0.0161 | HMDB 29942 |
| 24 | 24.877 | Hexadecanoic acid | 0.3109 ± 0.0146 | 0.27448 ± 0.0968 | 0.22018 ± 0.0698 | 0.2133 ± 0.0317 | 0.15475 ± 0.0359 | HMDB 00220 |
| 25 | 25.411 | Myo-inositol | 0.02709 ± 0.0011 | 0.04054 ± 0.0043 | 0.05513 ± 0.0209 | 0.03449 ± 0.0027 | 0.00611 ± 0.0018 | HMDB 00211 |
| 26 | 27.025 | Linoleic acid | 0.09659 ± 0.0158 | 0.14966 ± 0.0097 | 0.13681 ± 0.0508 | 0.10969 ± 0.035 | 0.1248 ± 0.0049 | HMDB 00673 |
| 27 | 27.1 | Elaidic acid | 0.07306 ± 0.0179 | 0.10672 ± 0.0386 | 0.1192 ± 0.0312 | 0.10621 ± 0.0527 | 0.1804 ± 0.0036 | HMDB 00573 |
| 28 | 27.404 | Octadecanoic acid | 0.1304 ± 0.0040 | 0.1216 ± 0.0178 | 0.10271 ± 0.034 | 0.10193 ± 0.0115 | 0.09816 ± 0.018 | HMDB 00827 |
| 29 | 28.714 | Arachidonic acid | 0.0223 ± 0.0016 | 0.0252 ± 0.0025 | 0.02653 ± 0.0102 | 0.0192 ± 0.009 | 0.0141 ± 0.0018 | HMDB 01043 |
| 30 | 32.967 | Cholesterol | 0.1060 ± 0.0898 | 0.07909 ± 0.0757 | 0.0413 ± 0.0837 | 0.0323 ± 0.0075 | 0.0451 ± 0.0209 | HMDB 00067 |
Figure 1Classification plots of three groups by random forest algorithm.
Figure 2Variable importance of all the metabolites.
Figure 3Biological pathways analysis based on all the metabolites.
Figure 4Classification plots of four groups by random forest algorithm.