Literature DB >> 32855230

Systematic mixed-method review of barriers to end-of-life communication in the family context.

Katharina Nagelschmidt1, Nico Leppin2, Carola Seifart3, Winfried Rief2, Pia von Blanckenburg2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Communication about the end of life is especially important in the family context, as patients and their families are considered as the care unit in palliative care. Open end-of-life communication can positively affect medical, psychological and relational outcomes during the dying process for patient and family. Regardless of the benefits of end-of-life conversations, many patients and their family caregivers speak little about relevant end-of-life issues. AIM: To identify barriers that hinder or influence the discussion of end-of-life issues in the family context.
DESIGN: A systematic mixed-method review according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of PsycInfo, CINAHL, PubMed and Web of Science was conducted and extended with a hand search. Peer-reviewed primary studies reporting on the barriers to or difficulties in end-of-life conversations experienced by terminally ill patients and/or family caregivers were included in this review.
RESULTS: 18 qualitative and two quantitative studies met the inclusion criteria. The experiences of n=205 patients and n=738 family caregivers were analysed qualitatively; n=293 patients and n=236 caregivers were surveyed in the questionnaire studies. Five overarching categories emerged from the extracted data: emotional, cognitive, communicative, relational and external processes can hinder end-of-life communication within the family. The most frequently reported barriers are emotional and cognitive processes such as protective buffering or belief in positive thinking.
CONCLUSIONS: Research on end-of-life communication barriers in the family context is scarce. Further research should enhance the development of appropriate assessment tools and interventions to support families with the challenges experienced regarding end-of-life conversations. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; end of life care; family management; psychological care

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32855230     DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Support Palliat Care        ISSN: 2045-435X            Impact factor:   3.568


  3 in total

1.  Thinking globally to improve care locally: A Delphi study protocol to achieve international clinical consensus on best-practice end-of-life communication with adolescents and young adults with cancer.

Authors:  Ursula M Sansom-Daly; Lori Wiener; Anne-Sophie Darlington; Hanneke Poort; Abby R Rosenberg; Meaghann S Weaver; Fiona Schulte; Antoinette Anazodo; Celeste Phillips; Louise Sue; Anthony R Herbert; Jennifer W Mack; Toni Lindsay; Holly Evans; Claire E Wakefield
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Palliative Care Nursing in Australia and the Role of the Registered Nurse in Palliative Care.

Authors:  Rajkumar Cheluvappa; Selwyn Selvendran
Journal:  Nurs Rep       Date:  2022-08-12

3.  'It was like taking an inner bath': A qualitative evaluation of a collaborative advance care planning-approach.

Authors:  Anna J Pedrosa Carrasco; Martin Koch; Teresa Machacek; Anna Genz; Svenja Herzog; Jorge Riera Knorrenschild; Pia von Blanckenburg; Carola Seifart
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 4.762

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.