| Literature DB >> 32854661 |
Emmanuella Yayra Saku1, Peter Nuro-Ameyaw1, Priscilla Cecilia Amenya1, Fidelis Mawunyo Kpodo1, Paul Esua-Amoafo1, Nii Korley Kortei2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Consumption of energy drinks has become an escalating global public health problem. The work schedule and irregular sleeping habits of commercial bus drivers make them highly susceptible to getting fatigued, hence most of them consume energy drinks as a fatigue management strategy. However, consumption of energy drinks produces numerous psychomotor side effects that if consumed among drivers puts the traveling public in danger of road accidents. This study sought to assess the prevalence of energy drink consumption and awareness of associated potential health problems among commercial long-distance bus drivers operating from the Ho municipality.Entities:
Keywords: Commercial bus drivers; Daily consumption; Energy drink; Reasons
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32854661 PMCID: PMC7457268 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09421-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Commercial Bus Drivers
| Parameter | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 132 | 100.0 |
| 18–25 | 12 | 9.1 |
| 26–35 | 38 | 28.8 |
| 36–45 | 45 | 34.1 |
| > 45 | 37 | 28.0 |
| Male | 132 | 100.0 |
| Ewe | 106 | 80.3 |
| Akan | 14 | 10.6 |
| Northerner | 12 | 9.1 |
| Christian | 117 | 88.6 |
| Muslim | 15 | 11.4 |
| Single | 35 | 26.5 |
| Married | 91 | 68.9 |
| Widowed | 6 | 4.5 |
| JHS | 24 | 18.2 |
| SHS / Voc / Tech | 77 | 58.3 |
| Tertiary | 22 | 16.7 |
| None | 9 | 6.8 |
| < ghȼ100 | 18 | 13.6 |
| ghȼ100–500 | 62 | 47.0 |
| ghȼ600–1000 | 29 | 22.0 |
| > ghȼ1000 | 23 | 17.4 |
| < 1 | 4 | 3.0 |
| 1–3 | 8 | 6.1 |
| 4–6 | 19 | 14.4 |
| 7–10 | 19 | 14.4 |
| > 10 | 82 | 62.1 |
| < 3 | 17 | 12.9 |
| 4–6 | 62 | 47.0 |
| 7–10 | 29 | 22.0 |
| > 10 | 24 | 18.2 |
Data presented as frequency and corresponding percentage
Fig. 1Number of Participants Who Have Ever Consumed Energy Drinks. Data presented as frequency and (corresponding percentage)
Fig. 2Number of Respondents Who Presently Consume Energy Drinks. Data presented in frequency and (corresponding percentage)
Fig. 3Reasons and Motivations for Consuming Energy Drinks
Fig. 4Factors Affecting Driving Performance
Fig. 5Mode of Introduction to Energy Drinks
Fig. 6Time of Day of Energy Drink Consumption among Drivers. ED = Energy drink
Fig. 7Frequency of Energy Drink Consumption among Drivers. ED = Energy drink
Fig. 8Number of Bottles / Cans Consumed Per Week
Working Hours Per Day and Time of Day Energy Drink Is Consumed
| Parameter | Working Hours / Day | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time of ED Consumption | < 3 | 4–6 | 7–10 | > 10 | Total |
| 4 (40.0) | 0 | 0 | 2 (7.4) | 6 (6.1) | |
| 0 | 4 (8.7) | 0 | 0 | 4 (4.0) | |
| 4 (40.0) | 20 (43.50) | 10 (63.5) | 8 (29.6) | 42 (42.4) | |
| 2 (20.0) | 8 (17.40) | 4 (25.0) | 7 (25.9) | 21 (21.0) | |
| 0 | 14 (30.4) | 2 (12.5) | 10 (37.0) | 26 (26.3) | |
| 10 (100) | 46 (100) | 16 (100) | 27 (100) | 99 (100) | |
Data presented as frequency and corresponding percentage
ED Energy drink
Drivers’ Income and Number of Bottles / Cans of Energy Drinks Consumed
| Parameter | Income | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bottles / Week | <Ghȼ100 | Ghȼ | Ghȼ | >Ghȼ | Total |
| 0 | 11 (21.2) | 1 (5.6) | 3 (18.8) | 15 (15.2) | |
4 (30.8) | 13 (25.0) | 5 (27.8) | 2 (12.5) | 24 (24.2) | |
5 (38.5) | 7 (13.5) | 1 (5.6) | 1 (6.2) | 14 (14.1) | |
2 (15.4) | 14 (26.9) | 11 (61.1) | 5 (31.2) | 32 (32.3) | |
2 (15.4) | 7 (13.5) | 0 | 5 (31.2) | 14 (14.1) | |
13 (100) | 52 (100) | 18 (100) | 16 (100) | 99 (100) | |
Data presented as frequency and corresponding percentage
ED Energy drink, ghȼ Ghana cedis
Fig. 9Respondents’ Responses to Getting Desired Results When They Consume Energy Drinks
Fig. 10Level of Knowledge of Drivers on Energy Drinks
Fig. 11Respondents’ Knowledge on Side Effects of Energy Drink
Pattern of Energy Drink Consumption
| ED Consumption | Age | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 9 (100) | 30 (93.8) | 32 (80.0) | 28 (87.5) | |
| No | 0 | 2 (6.20) | 8 (20.0) | 4 (12.5) | |
| Total | 9 (100) | 32 (100) | 40 (100) | 32 (100) | |
| Yes | 57 (90.5) | 9 (52.9) | 24 (100) | 9 (100) | |
| No | 6 (9.5) | 8 (47.1) | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | 63 (100) | 17 (100) | 24 (100) | 9 (100) | |
| Yes | 2 (100) | 7 (100) | 11 (73.3) | 17 (100) | 62 (86.1) |
| No | 0 | 0 | 4 (26.7) | 0 | 10 (13.9) |
| Total | 2 (100) | 7 (100) | 15 (100) | 17 (100) | 72 (100) |
| Association Between Knowledge on Side Effects and Energy Drink Consumption | |||||
| Yes | 68 (87.2) | 16 (88.9) | 15 (88.2) | 99 (87.60) | 0.977 |
| No | 10 (12.8) | 2 (11.1) | 2 (11.8) | 14 (12.4) | |
| Total | 78 (100) | 18 (100) | 17 (100) | 113 (100) | |
Data presented as frequency and corresponding percentage
ED Energy drink