| Literature DB >> 32854614 |
Claudia Mendonça Bezerra1,2, Carlota Josefovicz Belisário3, Grasielle Caldas D'Ávilla Pessoa4, Aline Cristine Luiz Rosa3, Carla Patrícia Barezani3, Flávio Campos Ferreira3, Alberto Novaes Ramos5, Ricardo Esteban Gürtler6,7, Liléia Diotaiuti8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Triatoma brasiliensis Neiva, 1911 is the main vector of Trypanosoma cruzi in the caatinga of Northeastern Brazil. Despite of its epidemiological relevance, there are few studies on its genetic variability. Using microsatellite markers, we characterized the variability and dynamics of infestation and reinfestation of T. brasiliensis after residual insecticide spraying in five surveys conducted in a well-defined rural area located in the municipality of Tauá, Ceará, between 2009 and 2015. We evaluated: (1) general variability among local of captures; (2) variability along the time analysis (2009, 2010 and 2015); (3) and reinfestation process.Entities:
Keywords: Ceará state; Chagas disease; Genetic variability; Microsatellites; Triatoma brasiliensis
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32854614 PMCID: PMC7457261 DOI: 10.1186/s12863-020-00903-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genet ISSN: 1471-2156 Impact factor: 2.797
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for Triatoma brasiliensis using microsatellite of the: (I) samples obtained in 2009 and 2010 according local of capture; (II) insects collected in 2009, 2010 and 2015; (III) reinfestation process in Cachoeira do Júlio locality
| Source of variation | Variance components | Percentage of variation | Fixation Indices | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.01 (Va) | 0.76 | 0.01 ( | 0.98 | ||
| 0.36 (Vb) | 19.80 | 0.20 ( | 0.00 | ||
| 144.06 (Vc) | 79.43 | 0.21 ( | 0.00 | ||
| 0.00 (Va) | 0.23 | 0.00 ( | 0.64 | ||
| 0.34 (Vb) | 18.51 | 0.19 ( | 0.00 | ||
| 149.23 (Vc) | 81.26 | 0.19( | 0.00 | ||
| 0.05 (Va) | 2.41 | 0.02 ( | 0.00 | ||
| 0.27 (Vb) | 14.18 | 0.15 ( | 0.00 | ||
| 159.09 (Vc) | 83.41 | 0.17( | 0.00 |
Pairwise FST values between the sites with Triatoma brasiliensis captures in Tauá, 2009 and 2010. Diagonally are the FIS values
BHA Belo Horizonte do Alfredo, BI Benfinca do Incra, Can Canadá, CJ Cachoeira do Júlio, M Mutuca, ME Mutuca Evangelista, MNP Morada Nova do Pedro, MNT Morada Nova do Thomaz, MPC Mutuca Pedra da Cruz, SBI São Bento do Incra, SC São Cristóvão, VT Várzea do Touro.*significant values (p < 0.05)
Number of alleles per locus in Triatoma brasiliensis captured in Tauá
| Samples | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb/2009 | Aug/2009 | Apr/2010 | Oct/2010 | Aug/2015 | Av | sd | N | bp | |
| 8 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 9.00 | 0.71 | 10 | 300–318 | |
| 12 | 11 | 12 | 10 | 12 | 11.40 | 0.90 | 14 | 274–388 | |
| 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 5.80 | 0.45 | 7 | 390–400 | |
| 21 | 16 | 22 | 14 | 20 | 18.60 | 3.44 | 25 | 214–268 | |
| 15 | 15 | 18 | 15 | 19 | 16.40 | 1.95 | 21 | 218–260 | |
| 12.40 | 11.40 | 13.40 | 10.60 | 13.40 | 12.24 | 1.24 | 15.40 | ||
| 5.94 | 4.16 | 6.54 | 4.04 | 5.98 | 5.33 | 1.15 | 7.50 | ||
Av average among loci; sd standard desviation; N number total of alleles per locus; bp base pair size of fragment
Feb/2009: February/2009; Aug/2009: August/2009; Apr/2010: April/2010; Oct/2010: October/2010 and Aug/2015: August/2015
Observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosity, and null allele frequencies estimated per locus (NA) in Triatoma brasiliensis captured in Tauá
| Tb728 | Tb830 | Tb860 | Tb8124 | Tb7180 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ho | He | NA | Ho | He | NA | Ho | He | NA | Ho | He | NA | Ho | He | NA | |
| 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.09 | |||||||||
| 0.16 | 0.73 | 0.79 | 0.02 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.72 | 0.87 | 0.08 | |||||
| 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.06 | |||||||||
| 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.09 | |||||||||
| 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.01 | 0.15 | 0.10 | |||||||||
*significant value (p < 0.05)
Pairwise FST (above diagonal) and FIS (in diagonal) values genotypic of the Triatoma brasiliensis captured in Tauá from february 2009 to august 2015
*significant value (p < 0.05)
Number of alleles per locus of Triatoma brasiliensis captured at a domiciliary unit in Cachoeira do Júlio locality
| 2010b_DU13 | 2010b_DU14 | 2015_DU13 | 2015_DU14 | 2015_W | Mean | s.d. | AN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4.40 | 0.89 | 7 | |
| 6 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 5.80 | 1.10 | 10 | |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3.80 | 0.45 | 5 | |
| 8 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 6.80 | 1.64 | 10 | |
| 4 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 6.60 | 2.41 | 13 | |
| 5.40 | 5.80 | 4.20 | 5.60 | 6.40 | 5.48 | 0.81 | 9.00 | |
| 1.67 | 1.48 | 0.45 | 2.07 | 2.61 | 1.66 | 0.80 | 3.08 |
2010b October/2010; 2015: August/2015; DU13 domiciliar unit 13; DU14 domiciliar unit 14, W wild; s.d. standard deviations; AN total number of allele
Observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosity per locus of Triatoma brasiliensis captured in Cachoeira do Júlio locality
| Tb728 | Tb830 | Tb860 | Tb8124 | Tb7180 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample | Ho | He | Ho | He | Ho | He | Ho | He | Ho | He |
| 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.75 | 0.72 | 0.38 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 0.72 | |||
| 0.63 | 0.83 | 0.88 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.88 | 0.63 | 0.77 | |||
| 0.60 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.84 | |||||
| 0.38 | 0.51 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 0.74 | 0.63 | 0.87 | 0.75 | 0.90 | |
| 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.80 | 0.74 | |||
DU13 domiciliar unit 13; DU14 domiciliar unit 14, W wild; 2010: October/2010; 2015: August/2015; *significant value (p < 0.05)
Genotypic differentiation among samples (pairwise FST) and intra sample (FIS) in diagonal from Cachoeira do Júlio locality
DU13 domiciliar unit 13; DU14 domiciliar unit 14; W wild; 2010: October/2010; 2015: August/2015; *significant value (p < 0.05)
Fig. 1UPGMA dendrogram of the pairwise FST of Triatoma brasiliensis. Captured in domiciliary units (C13 and C14) and wild environment (S) of Cachoeira do Júlio (CJ) locality. Captured in 2010 and 2015. The numbers in the branch are the bootstrap
Fig. 2Location of study área. a. Location of Ceará State, Brazil. b. Area of Tauá munipality, Ceará, Brazil. c. Study site. d. Detail of study site. Gray polygons: general variability and variability along the time analysis: 1. Belo Horizonte do Alfredo; 2. Mutuca; 3. Cachoeira do Julio; 4. Benfica do INCRA; 5. Canadá; 6. Morada Nova do Pedro; 7. Morada Nova do Tomaz; 8. São Bento do INCRA; 9. São Cristóvão; 10. Várzea do Touro; triangles indicate wild environments: 19. Mutuca Evangelista; 20. Mutuca Pedra da Cruz; 21. Cachoeira do Julio; 22. Morada Nova do Tomaz. Black polygons: variability along the time analysis: 11. Santa Fé; 12. Merejo do Angico; 13. Açude Novo Sátiro; 14. Mutuquinha; 15. Jasmim do Aluísio; 16. Betânia; 17. Cachoeira dos Pedrosas; 18. Umburana; triangles indicate wild environments: 23. Juá; 24. Caraúbas; 25. Monte Cristo; 26. Aroeira; 27. Pedra D’água. Source: adapted from QGis 2.14. Essen
Triatomines captured in the municipality of Tauá to evaluate the variability along the studied period
| Period | February 2009 | August 2009 | April 2010 | October 2010 | August 2015 | Total sample | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CL | DU | AE | WE | TT | DU | AE | WE | TT | DU | AE | WE | TT | DU | AE | WE | TT | DU | AE | WE | TT | AE | WE | insects |
| 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 20 | 11 | 31 | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 9 | 28 | |||||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 5 | 17 | |||||||||
| 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 3 | 17 | 20 | 5 | 13 | 16 | 29 | 1 | 1 | 29 | 30 | 5 | 22 | 22 | 7 | 31 | 15 | 46 | 70 | 99 | 169 | ||
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 8 | ||||||||||||
| 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 12 | 5 | 18 | 18 | 10 | 64 | 64 | 100 | 18 | 118 | |||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 20 | 20 | 22 | 0 | 22 | |||||||||||||||
| 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 35 | 35 | |||||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 13 | ||||||||||||||
| 5 | 14 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 30 | 4 | 34 | ||||||
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 15 | 11 | 26 | 27 | 14 | 41 | |||||
| 32 | 32 | 15 | 15 | 13 | 13 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 67 | 67 | |||||||||||||
| 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 13 | |||||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 13 | 13 | 21 | 0 | 21 | ||||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 6 | |||||||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
| 17 | 41 | 57 | 98 | 12 | 21 | 32 | 53 | 27 | 49 | 54 | 103 | 25 | 75 | 75 | 56 | 207 | 111 | 318 | 393 | 329 | 722 | ||
CL local of capture; DU Domiciliary units investigated; EA triatomines captured in artificial environments; WE triatomines captured in wild environments; TT total of triatomine; ANS Açude Novo do Sátiro; ARO Aroeira Bet Betânia; BHA Belo Horizonte do Alfredo; BI Benfinca do Incra; Can Canadá; CB:Caraúbas; CJ Cachoeira do Júlio; CP Cachoeira dos Pedrosas; JA Jasmim Aluizio; JUA Juá; M Mutuca; MA Merejo do Angico; MC Monte Cristo; ME Mutuca Evangelista; Mnha Mutuquinha; MNP Morada Nova do Pedro; MNT Morada Nova do Thomaz; MPC Mutuca Pedra da Cruz; PA Pedra D’Água; SBI São Bento do Incra; SC São Cristovão; SF Santa Fé; Um Umburana; VT Várzea do Touro
Triatoma brasiliensis captured in the municipality of Tauá for the general variability study
| Period | February 2009 | August 2009 | April 2010 | October 2010 | Total sample | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CL | DU | AE | WE | DU | AE | WE | DU | AE | WE | DU | AE | WE | DU | AE | WE | Total |
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 17 | ||||||
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 16 | 16 | ||||||||
| 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 10 | 10 | ||||||||
| 2 | 3 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 29 | 5 | 23 | 6 | 63 | 40 | 103 | ||
| 3 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 5 | 19 | 11 | 37 | 37 | ||||||||
| 10 | 1 | 12 | 23 | 0 | 23 | |||||||||||
| 5 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 24 | 24 | ||||||
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 | 12 | 12 | ||||||
| 32 | 16 | 13 | 61 | 0 | 61 | |||||||||||
| 1 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 9 | |||||||||||
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| 16 | 43 | 60 | 13 | 22 | 33 | 21 | 40 | 54 | 24 | 77 | 0 | 47 | 147 | 182 | 329 | |
DU Domiciliar units investigated; EA triatomines captured in artificial environments; WE triatomines captured in wild environments; CL local of capture; BHA Belo Horizonte do Alfredo; BI Benfica do Incra; Can Canadá; CJ Cachoeira do Júlio; M Mutuca; ME Mutuca Evangelista; MNP Morada Nova do Pedro; MNT Morada Nova do Thomaz; MPC Mutuca Pedra da Cruz; SBI São Bento do Incra; SC São Cristóvão; VT Várzea do Touro