| Literature DB >> 32854302 |
Almudena Bartolomé-Tomás1,2, Roberto Sánchez-Reolid1,3, Alicia Fernández-Sotos4, Antonio Fernández-Caballero1,3,5, José Miguel Latorre6.
Abstract
The detection of emotions is fundamental in many areas related to health and well-being. This paper presents the identification of the level of arousal in older people by monitoring their electrodermal activity (EDA) through a commercial device. The objective was to recognize arousal changes to create future therapies that help them to improve their mood, contributing to reduce possible situations of depression and anxiety. To this end, some elderly people in the region of Murcia were exposed to listening to various musical genres (flamenco, Spanish folklore, Cuban genre and rock/jazz) that they heard in their youth. Using methods based on the process of deconvolution of the EDA signal, two different studies were carried out. The first, of a purely statistical nature, was based on the search for statistically significant differences for a series of temporal, morphological, statistical and frequency features of the processed signals. It was found that Flamenco and Spanish Folklore presented the highest number of statistically significant parameters. In the second study, a wide range of classifiers was used to analyze the possible correlations between the detection of the EDA-based arousal level compared to the participants' responses to the level of arousal subjectively felt. In this case, it was obtained that the best classifiers are support vector machines, with 87% accuracy for flamenco and 83.1% for Spanish Folklore, followed by K-nearest neighbors with 81.4% and 81.5% for Flamenco and Spanish Folklore again. These results reinforce the notion of familiarity with a musical genre on emotional induction.Entities:
Keywords: aging adults; arousal; electrodermal activity; musical genres
Year: 2020 PMID: 32854302 PMCID: PMC7506973 DOI: 10.3390/s20174788
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Musical genres and styles used in the experiment.
| Musical Genre | Style |
|---|---|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Figure 1Flowchart of the experimental design
Figure 2Flowchart of the deconvolution process
Figure 3Flowchart of the feature extraction process
Features obtained from skin conductance response (SCR)
| Analysis | Features |
|---|---|
|
| M, SD, MA, MI, DR, D1, D2, D1M, D2M, D1SD, D2SD |
|
| AL, IN, AP, RMS, IL, EL |
|
| SK, KU, MO |
|
| F1, F2, F3 |
Mean and standard deviation for the different features.
| Type | Feature | Neutral | Flamenco | Cuban | Spanish Folklore | Rock/Jazz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temp. |
| 5.53 (4.00) | 10.01 (6.62) | 8.34 (6.60) | 13.01 (8.62) | 7.34 (1.80) |
|
| 4.52 (4.76) | 6.34 (2.79) | 6.10 (1.70) | 8.69 (5.50) | 6.42 (3.40) | |
|
| 28.43 (26.67) | 33.32 (6.23) | 34.32 (5.20) | 37.10 (1.82) | 35.51 (4.24) | |
|
| 0.51 (0.13) | 0.81 (0.60) | 0.64 (0.51) | 0.66 (0.38) | 0.66 (0.38) | |
|
| 28.43 (6.67) | 29.79 (6.21) | 34.83 (17.21) | 25.83 (2.69) | 29.82 (6.43) | |
|
| 0.98 (0.14) | 1.13 (0.45) | 1.07 (0.23) | 1.09 (0.28) | 1.03 (0.07) | |
|
| 0.56 (0.20) | 0.71 (0.38) | 0.67 (0.51) | 0.86 (0.54) | 0.71 (0.54) | |
|
| 0.86 (0.13) | 0.90 (0.12) | 0.74 (0.44) | 0.93 (0.59) | 0.74 (0.44) | |
|
| 0.45 (0.17) | 0.426 (0.02) | 0.48 (0.17) | 0.52 (0.26) | 0.55 (0.31) | |
|
| 0.99 (0.96) | 1.23 (0.36) | 1.43 (0.29) | 1.40 (0.21) | 1.40 (0.21) | |
|
| 0.29 (0.01) | 0.34 (0.12) | 0.56 (0.39) | 0.56 (0.39) | 0.36 (0.12) | |
| Morph. |
| 14,049.0 (99.8) | 13,950.4 (388.4) | 13,850.4 (606.3) | 13,950.4 (348.6) | 14,450.4 (890.0) |
|
| 193.98 (148.38) | 186.98 (64.76) | 245.77 (86.67) | 246.77 (115.67) | 230.98 (75.34) | |
|
| 4.56 (9.33) | 8.17 (1.97) | 4.56 (9.33) | 8.17 (3.12) | 2.17 (2.12) | |
|
| 7.14 (6.23) | 8.96 (4.23) | 10.96 (7.34) | 9.80 (6.32) | 8.25 (6.34) | |
|
| 5.50 (4.14) | 6.32 (4.80) | 5.17 (2.80) | 7.43 (2.87) | 6.96 (4.23) | |
|
| 0.065 (0.0013) | 0.074 (0.049) | 0.085 (0.054) | 0.079 (0.039) | 0.045 (0.099) | |
| Stat. |
| 1.18 (0.98) | 1.45 (0.89) | 1.82(1.72) | 1.69 (0.96) | 1.82 (1.79) |
|
| 1.65 (1.09) | 2.67 (2.45) | 1.87 (1.02) | 1.89 (1.04) | 1.40 (1.34) | |
|
| 2.10 (4.06) | 4.21 (3.87) | 3.44 (0.24) | 4.01 (3.87) | 3.8 (1.76) | |
| Freq. |
| 2.90 (0.29) | 3.60 (1.84) | 3.28 (1.99) | 2.78 (0.92) | 3.04 (1.35) |
|
| 0.15 (0.32) | 0.20 (0.04) | 0.29 (0.12) | 0.24 (0.13) | 0.19 (0.02) | |
|
| 0.92 (0.37) | 0.79 (0.54) | 0.98 (0.26) | 0.98 (0.26) | 1.15 (0.64) |
p-value for the different features.
| Type | Features | Flamenco | Cuban | Spanish Folklore | Rock/Jazz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temporal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| 0.116 | |
|
|
| 0.120 |
|
| |
|
| 0.340 |
|
| 0.320 | |
|
|
|
| 0.260 |
| |
|
|
| 0.211 |
| 0.116 | |
|
| 0.160 | 0.116 | 0.442 | 0.116 | |
|
| 0.320 | 0.424 | 0.120 | 0.070 | |
|
|
| 0.074 |
| 0.098 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Morphological |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1.100 | 0.065 | 0.080 | 0.766 | |
|
|
|
|
| 0.135 | |
|
| 0.150 | 0.075 | 0.098 | 0.447 | |
|
| 0.420 | 0.687 |
| 0.121 | |
|
| 0.230 |
|
| 0.210 | |
| Statistical |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.349 | 0.333 | 0.600 | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Frequential |
| 0.120 | 0.233 | 0.435 | 0.516 |
|
| 0.320 |
| 0.110 | 0.432 | |
|
| 0.210 | 0.434 | 0.434 | 0.053 |
Figure 4Statistically significant features for each of the musical genres according to their p-value.
Accuracy (%) of arousal assessment through different classifiers.
| Classifier | Type | Flamenco | Cuban | Spanish Folklore | Rock/Jazz |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | Logistic |
| 64.0 (0.19) | 61.0 (1.20) | 60.0 (1.01) |
| Discriminant | Linear |
| 40.3 (0.03) | 46.3 (0.73) | 42.5 (1.47) |
| Naïve Bayes | Gaussian |
|
|
|
|
| Standard | 67.6 (0.45) | 70.0 (0.00) | 68.1 (0.82) |
| |
| Tree | Fine | 56.0 (0.12) | 69.1 (0.03) | 52.0 (0.02) | 40.1 (0.10) |
| Medium |
| 67.1 (0.00) |
| 45.1 (0.27) | |
| Coarse | 70.1 (0.00) |
| 62.1 (0.00) | 52.1 (0.45) | |
| Ensemble Tree | Boosted | 72.3 (0.04) | 69.7 (0.14) | 76.85 (0.23) | 67.3 (0.37) |
| Bagged | 71.0 (0.01) | 67.9 (0.11) | 72.0 (0.00) | 68.1 (0.76) | |
| RUS boosted | 73.0 (0.40) | 70.1 (0.50) | 70.9 (0.03) |
| |
| Subspace KNN |
|
|
| 68.1 (0.20) | |
| KNN | Fine | 76.0 (0.09) | 73.9 (0.10) | 76.0 (0.09) | 70.0 (0.00) |
| Medium | 82.3 (0.05) |
|
|
| |
| Coarse | 80.4 (0.02) | 79.1 (0.40) | 77.1 (0.18) | 71.09 (1.60) | |
| Cosine |
| 77.1 (1.10) | 77.1 (1.80) | 68.18 (1.70) | |
| Weighted | 80.9 (0.00) | 79.2 (0.06) | 80.9 (0.00) | 75.0 (0.00) | |
| SVM | Linear | 78.0 (0.01) | 73.3 (0.63) | 79.1 (0.03) |
|
| Quadratic | 72.4 (0.13) | 72.4 (0.13) | 72.4 (0.13) | 62.0 (0.13) | |
| Cubic | 76.4 (0.60) | 78.3 (0.54) | 80.4 (0.53) | 65.4 (0.30) | |
| Radial (RBF) |
|
|
| 67.3 (0.20) |