Cristóbal Loezar1, Javier Pérez-Bracchiglione1, Marcelo Arancibia1, Nicolás Meza2, Manuel Vargas1, Cristian Papuzinski1, Gabriel Rada3, Camila Ondarza4, Catalina Jahr4, Carlos Cadena5, Eva Madrid6. 1. Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile, Angamos 655, Room 1009, Reñaca, Viña del Mar, Chile; Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile, Angamos 655, Reñaca, Viña del Mar, Chile; Cochrane Chile, Associate Centre Universidad de Valparaiso, Angamos 655, Room 1111, Reñaca, Viña del Mar, Chile. 2. Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile, Angamos 655, Room 1009, Reñaca, Viña del Mar, Chile; Cochrane Chile, Associate Centre Universidad de Valparaiso, Angamos 655, Room 1111, Reñaca, Viña del Mar, Chile. 3. UC Evidence Centre, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 476, Santiago, Chile. 4. School of Medicine, Universidad de Valparaíso, Angamos 655, Reñaca, Viña del Mar, Chile. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Universidad de Valparaíso, Hontaneda 2664, Valparaiso, Chile. 6. Interdisciplinary Centre for Health Studies (CIESAL), Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile, Angamos 655, Room 1009, Reñaca, Viña del Mar, Chile; Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, Universidad de Valparaíso, Chile, Angamos 655, Reñaca, Viña del Mar, Chile; Cochrane Chile, Associate Centre Universidad de Valparaiso, Angamos 655, Room 1111, Reñaca, Viña del Mar, Chile. Electronic address: eva.madrid@uv.cl.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Chilean health system mandates providers to ensure assistance under a guaranteed system, the Explicit Guarantees in Healthcare (EGH) program. The Health Ministry has developed clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), but independent assessment of their quality is lacking. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We assessed all CPGs of the EGH program using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool for appraising quality, validity period, and last update. RESULTS: Eighty-six CPGs were published between 2005 and 2016. Only 15 (17.4%) were updated. The overall mean raw score was 4.18 (±0.98). The scaled scores for each domain were: Scope and objectives 79.7%, Stakeholder involvement 46.2%, Rigor of development 36.3%, Clarity of presentation 82.8%, Applicability 23.5%, and Editorial independence 39.2%. The highest items were: overall objectives described, population described, options for management clearly presented, and key recommendations easily identifiable. The worst evaluated items were: views and preferences of the target population, strengths and limitations of the body of evidence, methods for formulating the recommendations, external review by experts, and description of facilitators and barriers to application. CONCLUSION: Most Chilean CPGs included in the EGH program are outdated and show items that should be improved, mainly through a more rigorous methodology, the inclusion of patients in its development, and appropriate consideration of its applicability.
OBJECTIVES: The Chilean health system mandates providers to ensure assistance under a guaranteed system, the Explicit Guarantees in Healthcare (EGH) program. The Health Ministry has developed clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), but independent assessment of their quality is lacking. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We assessed all CPGs of the EGH program using Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool for appraising quality, validity period, and last update. RESULTS: Eighty-six CPGs were published between 2005 and 2016. Only 15 (17.4%) were updated. The overall mean raw score was 4.18 (±0.98). The scaled scores for each domain were: Scope and objectives 79.7%, Stakeholder involvement 46.2%, Rigor of development 36.3%, Clarity of presentation 82.8%, Applicability 23.5%, and Editorial independence 39.2%. The highest items were: overall objectives described, population described, options for management clearly presented, and key recommendations easily identifiable. The worst evaluated items were: views and preferences of the target population, strengths and limitations of the body of evidence, methods for formulating the recommendations, external review by experts, and description of facilitators and barriers to application. CONCLUSION: Most Chilean CPGs included in the EGH program are outdated and show items that should be improved, mainly through a more rigorous methodology, the inclusion of patients in its development, and appropriate consideration of its applicability.
Authors: Tanja Kovačević; Davorka Vrdoljak; Slavica Jurić Petričević; Ivan Buljan; Dario Sambunjak; Željko Krznarić; Ana Marušić; Ana Jerončić Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 4.614