Literature DB >> 32853429

Association of Billed Advance Care Planning with End-of-Life Care Intensity for 2017 Medicare Decedents.

Avni Gupta1,2, Ginger Jin1, Amanda Reich1, Holly G Prigerson3, Keren Ladin4,5, Dae Kim6, Deepshikha Charan Ashana7, Zara Cooper1, Scott D Halpern7,8, Joel S Weissman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVE: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) reimburses clinicians for advance care planning (ACP) discussions with Medicare patients. The objective of the study was to examine the association of CMS-billed ACP visits with end-of-life (EOL) healthcare utilization.
DESIGN: Patient-level analyses of claims for the random 20% Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) sample of decedents in 2017. To account for multiple comparisons, Bonferroni adjusted P value <.008 was considered statistically significant.
SETTING: Nationally representative sample of Medicare FFS beneficiaries. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 237,989 Medicare FFS beneficiaries who died in 2017 and included those with and without a billed ACP visit during 2016-17. INTERVENTION: The key exposure variable was receipt of first billed ACP (none, >1 month before death). MEASUREMENTS: Six measures of EOL healthcare utilization or intensity (inpatient admission, emergency department [ED] visit, intensive care unit [ICU] stay, and expenditures within 30 days of death, in-hospital death, and first hospice within 3 days of death). Analyses was adjusted for age, race, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, expenditure by Dartmouth hospital referral region (high, medium, or low), and dual eligibility.
RESULTS: Overall, 6.3% (14,986) of the sample had at least one billed ACP visit. After multivariable adjustment, patients with an ACP visit experienced significantly less intensive EOL care on four of six measures: hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] = .77; 95% confidence interval [CI] = .74-.79), ED visit (OR = .77; 95% CI = .75-.80), or ICU stay (OR = .78; 95% CI = .74-.81) within a month of death; and they were less likely to die in the hospital (OR = .79; 95% CI = .76-.82). There were no differences in the rate of late hospice enrollment (OR = .97; 95% CI = .92-1.01; P = .119) or mean expenditures ($242.50; 95% CI = -$103.63 to $588.61; P = .169).
CONCLUSION: Billed ACP visits were relatively uncommon among Medicare FFS decedents, but their occurrence was associated with less intensive EOL utilization. Further research on the variables affecting hospice use and expenditures in the EOL period is recommended to understand the relative role of ACP.
© 2020 The American Geriatrics Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare; advance care planning; end of life

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32853429     DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  8 in total

1.  Practice Billing for Medicare Advance Care Planning Across the USA.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Luth; Adoma Manful; Joel S Weissman; Amanda Reich; Keren Ladin; Robert Semco; Ishani Ganguli
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Older patients' and their caregivers' understanding of advanced care planning.

Authors:  Elissa Kozlov; Danielle H Llaneza; Kelly Trevino
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.265

3.  Association of Advance Care Planning Visits With Intensity of Health Care for Medicare Beneficiaries With Serious Illness at the End of Life.

Authors:  Joel S Weissman; Amanda J Reich; Holly G Prigerson; Priscilla Gazarian; Jennifer Tjia; Dae Kim; Phil Rodgers; Adoma Manful
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2021-07-30

4.  Intensity of end-of-life care for dual-eligible beneficiaries with cancer and the impact of delivery system affiliation.

Authors:  Lindsey A Herrel; Ziwei Zhu; Andrew M Ryan; Brent K Hollenbeck; David C Miller
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 6.921

5.  Advance care planning among Medicare beneficiaries with dementia undergoing surgery.

Authors:  Samir K Shah; Adoma Manful; Amanda J Reich; Robert S Semco; Jennifer Tjia; Keren Ladin; Joel S Weissman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 7.538

6.  International comparison of spending and utilization at the end of life for hip fracture patients.

Authors:  Carl Rudolf Blankart; Kees van Gool; Irene Papanicolas; Enrique Bernal-Delgado; Nicholas Bowden; Francisco Estupiñán-Romero; Robin Gauld; Hannah Knight; Olukorede Abiona; Kristen Riley; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Kosta Shatrov; Walter P Wodchis; Jose F Figueroa
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  End-of-Life Planning Depends on Socio-Economic and Racial Background: Evidence from the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS).

Authors:  Martina Orlovic; Haider Warraich; Douglas Wolf; Elias Mossialos
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Natural Language Processing to Identify Advance Care Planning Documentation in a Multisite Pragmatic Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Charlotta Lindvall; Chih-Ying Deng; Edward Moseley; Nicole Agaronnik; Areej El-Jawahri; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Joshua R Lakin; Angelo Volandes; The Acp-Peace Investigators James A Tulsky
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 5.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.