Literature DB >> 32852064

Stress shielding at the bone-implant interface: Influence of surface roughness and of the bone-implant contact ratio.

Maria Letizia Raffa1,2, Vu-Hieu Nguyen1,3, Philippe Hernigou4,5, Charles-Henri Flouzat-Lachaniette4,5, Guillaume Haiat6.   

Abstract

Short and long-term stabilities of cementless implants are strongly determined by the interfacial load transfer between implants and bone tissue. Stress-shielding effects arise from shear stresses due to the difference of material properties between bone and the implant. It remains difficult to measure the stress field in periprosthetic bone tissue. This study proposes to investigate the dependence of the stress field in periprosthetic bone tissue on (i) the implant surface roughness, (ii) the material properties of bone and of the implant, (iii) the bone-implant contact ratio. To do so, a microscale two-dimensional finite element model of an osseointegrated bone-implant interface was developed where the surface roughness was modeled by a sinusoidal surface. The results show that the isostatic pressure is not affected by the presence of the bone-implant interface while shear stresses arise due to the combined effects of a geometrical singularity (for low surface roughness) and of shear stresses at the bone-implant interface (for high surface roughness). Stress-shielding effects are likely to be more important when the bone-implant contact ratio value is low, which corresponds to a case of relatively low implant stability. Shear stress reach a maximum value at a distance from the interface comprised between 0 and 0.1 time roughness wavelength λ and tend to 0 at a distance from the implant surface higher than λ, independently from bone-implant contact ratio and waviness ratio. A comparison with an analytical model allows validating the numerical results. Future work should use the present approach to model osseointegration phenomena.
© 2020 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone-implant interface; finite element modeling; osseointegration; stress-shielding; surface roughness

Year:  2020        PMID: 32852064     DOI: 10.1002/jor.24840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  4 in total

1.  Mechanical micromodeling of stress-shielding at the bone-implant interphase under shear loading.

Authors:  Yoann Hériveaux; Sophie Le Cann; Manon Fraulob; Elsa Vennat; Vu-Hieu Nguyen; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.079

2.  Biomechanical evaluations of the long-term stability of dental implant using finite element modeling method: a systematic review.

Authors:  Seyed Aref Hosseini-Faradonbeh; Hamid Reza Katoozian
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 1.989

3.  The limit of tolerable micromotion for implant osseointegration: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nupur Kohli; Jennifer C Stoddart; Richard J van Arkel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Porous construction and surface modification of titanium-based materials for osteogenesis: A review.

Authors:  Rui Wang; Shilei Ni; Li Ma; Meihua Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-25
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.