Geoffrey Liu1,2,3,4,5, Grainne M O'Kane6, Ali Vedadi6, Sharara Shakik6,7, M Catherine Brown6, Benjamin H Lok8,9, Frances A Shepherd6, Natasha B Leighl6, Adrian Sacher6, Penelope A Bradbury6, Wei Xu10,11. 1. Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G2M9, Canada. geoffrey.liu@uhn.ca. 2. Department of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. geoffrey.liu@uhn.ca. 3. Institute for Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. geoffrey.liu@uhn.ca. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. geoffrey.liu@uhn.ca. 5. Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. geoffrey.liu@uhn.ca. 6. Medical Oncology and Hematology, Department of Medicine, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G2M9, Canada. 7. Department of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 8. Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada. 9. Institute for Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 10. Biostatistics, Applied Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada. 11. Department of Biostatistics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly fatal disease associated with significant morbidity, with a need for real-world symptom and health utility score (HUS) data. HUS can be measured using an EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, however most captured data is available in non-SCLC (NSCLC) only. As new treatment regimens become available in SCLC it becomes important to understand factors which influence health-related quality of life and health utility. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study (2012-2017) of ambulatory histologically confirmed SCLC evaluated patient-reported EQ-5D-5L-derived HUS, toxicity and symptoms. A set of NSCLC patients was used to compare differential factors affecting HUS. Clinical and demographic factors were evaluated for differential interactions between lung cancer types. Comorbidity scores were documented for each patient. RESULTS: In 75 SCLC and 150 NSCLC patients, those with SCLC had lower mean HUS ((SCLC vs NSCLC: mean 0.69 vs 0.79); (p < 0.001)) when clinically stable and with progressive disease: ((SCLC mean HUS = 0.60 vs NSCLC mean HUS = 0.77), (p = 0.04)). SCLC patients also had higher comorbidity scores ((1.11 vs 0.73); (p < 0.015)). In multivariable analyses, increased symptom severity and comorbidity scores decreased HUS in both SCLC and NSCLC (p < 0.001); however, only comorbidity scores differentially affected HUS (p < 0.0001), with a greater reduction of HUS adjusted per unit of comorbidity in SCLC. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced SCLC had significantly lower HUS than NSCLC. Both patient cohorts are impacted by symptoms and comorbidity, however, comorbidity had a greater negative effect in SCLC patients.
PURPOSE: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly fatal disease associated with significant morbidity, with a need for real-world symptom and health utility score (HUS) data. HUS can be measured using an EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, however most captured data is available in non-SCLC (NSCLC) only. As new treatment regimens become available in SCLC it becomes important to understand factors which influence health-related quality of life and health utility. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study (2012-2017) of ambulatory histologically confirmed SCLC evaluated patient-reported EQ-5D-5L-derived HUS, toxicity and symptoms. A set of NSCLC patients was used to compare differential factors affecting HUS. Clinical and demographic factors were evaluated for differential interactions between lung cancer types. Comorbidity scores were documented for each patient. RESULTS: In 75 SCLC and 150 NSCLC patients, those with SCLC had lower mean HUS ((SCLC vs NSCLC: mean 0.69 vs 0.79); (p < 0.001)) when clinically stable and with progressive disease: ((SCLC mean HUS = 0.60 vs NSCLC mean HUS = 0.77), (p = 0.04)). SCLC patients also had higher comorbidity scores ((1.11 vs 0.73); (p < 0.015)). In multivariable analyses, increased symptom severity and comorbidity scores decreased HUS in both SCLC and NSCLC (p < 0.001); however, only comorbidity scores differentially affected HUS (p < 0.0001), with a greater reduction of HUS adjusted per unit of comorbidity in SCLC. CONCLUSION: Patients with advanced SCLC had significantly lower HUS than NSCLC. Both patient cohorts are impacted by symptoms and comorbidity, however, comorbidity had a greater negative effect in SCLC patients.
Entities:
Keywords:
Comorbidity; Health utility score; Non-small cell lung cancer; Quality of life; Small cell lung cancer; Symptom severity
Authors: A Aupérin; R Arriagada; J P Pignon; C Le Péchoux; A Gregor; R J Stephens; P E Kristjansen; B E Johnson; H Ueoka; H Wagner; J Aisner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-08-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joshua K Sabari; Benjamin H Lok; James H Laird; John T Poirier; Charles M Rudin Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2017-05-23 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Clarissa Seródio Baldotto; Eduardo Henrique Cronemberger; Paulo de Biasi; Mauro Zamboni; Aureliano Sousa; Mauro Zukin; Isabelle A Small; Carlos Gil Ferreira Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-02-10 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Leora Horn; Aaron S Mansfield; Aleksandra Szczęsna; Libor Havel; Maciej Krzakowski; Maximilian J Hochmair; Florian Huemer; György Losonczy; Melissa L Johnson; Makoto Nishio; Martin Reck; Tony Mok; Sivuonthanh Lam; David S Shames; Juan Liu; Beiying Ding; Ariel Lopez-Chavez; Fairooz Kabbinavar; Wei Lin; Alan Sandler; Stephen V Liu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nuria Rodríguez de Dios; Felipe Couñago; José Luis López; Patricia Calvo; Mauricio Murcia; Mikel Rico; Carmen Vallejo; Javier Luna; Itziar Trueba; Cristina Cigarral; Nuria Farre; Rosa Maria Manero; Xavier Durán; Pilar Samper Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Feng Xie; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Kathy Gaebel; Nick Bansback; Stirling Bryan; Arto Ohinmaa; Lise Poissant; Jeffrey A Johnson Journal: Med Care Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 2.983