Literature DB >> 32851103

On the Impact of Granularity of Space-based Urban CO2 Emissions in Urban Atmospheric Inversions: A Case Study for Indianapolis, IN.

Tomohiro Oda1,2, Thomas Lauvaux3, Dengsheng Lu4, Preeti Rao5, Natasha L Miles3, Scott J Richardson3, Kevin R Gurney6.   

Abstract

Quantifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from cities is a key challenge towards effective emissions management. An inversion analysis from the INdianapolis FLUX experiment (INFLUX) project, as the first of its kind, has achieved a top-down emission estimate for a single city using CO2 data collected by the dense tower network deployed across the city. However, city-level emission data, used as a priori emissions, are also a key component in the atmospheric inversion framework. Currently, fine-grained emission inventories (EIs) able to resolve GHG city emissions at high spatial resolution, are only available for few major cities across the globe. Following the INFLUX inversion case with a global 1×1 km ODIAC fossil fuel CO2 emission dataset, we further improved the ODIAC emission field and examined its utility as a prior for the city scale inversion. We disaggregated the 1×1 km ODIAC non-point source emissions using geospatial datasets such as the global road network data and satellite-data driven surface imperviousness data to a 30×30 m resolution. We assessed the impact of the improved emission field on the inversion result, relative to priors in previous studies (Hestia and ODIAC). The posterior total emission estimate (5.1 MtC/yr) remains statistically similar to the previous estimate with ODIAC (5.3 MtC/yr). However, the distribution of the flux corrections was very close to those of Hestia inversion and the model-observation mismatches were significantly reduced both in forward and inverse runs, even without hourly temporal changes in emissions. EIs reported by cities often do not have estimates of spatial extents. Thus, emission disaggregation is a required step when verifying those reported emissions using atmospheric models. Our approach offers gridded emission estimates for global cities that could serves as a prior for inversion, even without locally reported EIs in a systematic way to support city-level Measuring, Reporting and Verification (MRV) practice implementation.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 32851103      PMCID: PMC7447070          DOI: 10.1525/elementa.146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Elementa (Wash D C)        ISSN: 2325-1026            Impact factor:   6.053


  7 in total

1.  Atmospheric science. Top-down versus bottom-up.

Authors:  Euan Nisbet; Ray Weiss
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Cities, traffic, and CO2: A multidecadal assessment of trends, drivers, and scaling relationships.

Authors:  Conor K Gately; Lucy R Hutyra; Ian Sue Wing
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  High-resolution atmospheric inversion of urban CO2 emissions during the dormant season of the Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX).

Authors:  Thomas Lauvaux; Natasha L Miles; Aijun Deng; Scott J Richardson; Maria O Cambaliza; Kenneth J Davis; Brian Gaudet; Kevin R Gurney; Jianhua Huang; Darragh O'Keefe; Yang Song; Anna Karion; Tomohiro Oda; Risa Patarasuk; Igor Razlivanov; Daniel Sarmiento; Paul Shepson; Colm Sweeney; Jocelyn Turnbull; Kai Wu
Journal:  J Geophys Res Atmos       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.261

4.  Quantification of fossil fuel CO2 emissions on the building/street scale for a large U.S. city.

Authors:  Kevin R Gurney; Igor Razlivanov; Yang Song; Yuyu Zhou; Bedrich Benes; Michel Abdul-Massih
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China.

Authors:  Zhu Liu; Dabo Guan; Wei Wei; Steven J Davis; Philippe Ciais; Jin Bai; Shushi Peng; Qiang Zhang; Klaus Hubacek; Gregg Marland; Robert J Andres; Douglas Crawford-Brown; Jintai Lin; Hongyan Zhao; Chaopeng Hong; Thomas A Boden; Kuishuang Feng; Glen P Peters; Fengming Xi; Junguo Liu; Yuan Li; Yu Zhao; Ning Zeng; Kebin He
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  High resolution fossil fuel combustion CO2 emission fluxes for the United States.

Authors:  Kevin R Gurney; Daniel L Mendoza; Yuyu Zhou; Marc L Fischer; Chris C Miller; Sarath Geethakumar; Stephane de la Rue du Can
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Holidays in lights: Tracking cultural patterns in demand for energy services.

Authors:  Miguel O Román; Eleanor C Stokes
Journal:  Earths Future       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 7.495

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  A multi-city urban atmospheric greenhouse gas measurement data synthesis.

Authors:  Logan E Mitchell; John C Lin; Lucy R Hutyra; David R Bowling; Ronald C Cohen; Kenneth J Davis; Elizabeth DiGangi; Riley M Duren; James R Ehleringer; Clayton Fain; Matthias Falk; Abhinav Guha; Anna Karion; Ralph F Keeling; Jooil Kim; Natasha L Miles; Charles E Miller; Sally Newman; Diane E Pataki; Steve Prinzivalli; Xinrong Ren; Andrew Rice; Scott J Richardson; Maryann Sargent; Britton B Stephens; Jocelyn C Turnbull; Kristal R Verhulst; Felix Vogel; Ray F Weiss; James Whetstone; Steven C Wofsy
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 8.501

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.